Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
You apparently don't know much about the Democratic Party. Are there self described socialists in the Democratic Party? Yes. I'll even give you that most self-described socialists vote for the Democrats when giving a choice. But that is not the same things as the majority of Democrats being socialists.Its what they call themselves. Most of the voters who vote Democrat call themselves socialists. They vote for their agenda so therefore the Democrat party is socialist. That is old news though.
Giuliani is an American hero
and its a shame to see so many young and ill-informed people celebrating a fraudulent case fabricated by socialists. This all leads nowhere good real fast.
I think the Congresswoman doth file ethics complaints against judges too much.
Rep. Elise Stefanik files ethics complaint against judge in Trump's civil fraud trialThe senior House Republican and close Trump ally accused Judge Arthur Engoron of “weaponized lawfare” against the former president and called on the judge to recuse himself.
Not in the case of Engoron.Could it be because judges have become too political? Thereby becoming activists themselves?
Was there ever any doubt that the liberal New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct would rule against Guilliani and Stefanik?Not in the case of Engoron.
“The commission dismissed the complaint, having found no basis on the facts presented to commence an investigation,” wrote Robert H. Tembeckjian, the commission administrator and counsel.
Although nearly all such complaints are filed and processed in secret, Stefanik announced the accusation on X in November, in what was largely seen as an attempt to get in Trump’s good graces and elevate her profile while the presumptive Republican presidential nominee narrows down his list of candidates for vice president.
On March 14, the New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct chucked out Stefanik’s accusation. The legal process typically takes place behind closed doors, but The Daily Beast acquired a copy of the decision.
I think their being guilty certainly played a role in the general belief they’d be ruled against, lol.Was there ever any doubt that the liberal New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct would rule against Guilliani and Stefanik?
Being guilty of a politically charged crime in the very liberal courts of New York was something that I expected to happen. Also, I expected that the liberals in that NY State Commission to rule against Stefanik and Guilliani.I think their being guilty certainly played a role in the general belief they’d be ruled against, lol.
See above, lol.Being guilty of a politically charged crime in the very liberal courts of New York was something that I expected to happen. Also, I expected that the liberals in that NY State Commission to rule against Stefanik and Guilliani.
lolSee above, lol.
Defamation is a civil matter. And Giuliani conceded that he had defamed the two women.Being guilty of a politically charged crime
What a farcical picture of the situation.Guilliani has become the scapegoat and the proverbial pound of flesh for the progressive left wing liberals in the "justice system", in my opinion.
So, when did it become normal to absolutely and completely financially bankrupt one man for losing against this kind of a civil lawsuit?What a farcical picture of the situation.
Summarizing Giuliani's statements in court (as opposed to what he tells television cameras):
No, you can't see my documents relevant to this matter.
Yes, I did it.
No, I have no defense.
So, when did it become normal to absolutely and completely financially bankrupt one man for losing against this kind of a civil lawsuit?
That's not a comment worthy of you.Was there ever any doubt that the liberal New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct would rule against Guilliani and Stefanik?
When did it become normal for a politically connected lawyer to go after ordinary public servants just doing their jobs? When did it become normal for one man, leading a team of many, to victimize two innocent women by telling egregious lies about them, including that they were conspiring traitors such that they were no longer able to do their jobs? When did it become normal for one famous lawyer to subject two innocent women to harassment and death threats such that they had to go into hiding? When did it become normal for the guilty, wealthy victimizer to refuse to simply settle the case, draw the litigation out while continuing to defame his victims for years out of bad faith, fail to preserve and present discovery evidence and then refuse to pay after losing, going so far as to actively hide and transfer his assets?So, when did it become normal to absolutely and completely financially bankrupt one man for losing against this kind of a civil lawsuit?
Oh bless your heart BradskiiThat's not a comment worthy of you.
I respectfully disagree with that comment.That's not a comment worthy of you.
If I was on a jury for a civil trial like this one or a similar one, I would find it difficult to blame the defendant for the actions of those who were sending death threats being criminally harassing towards the plaintiff.When did it become normal for a politically connected lawyer to go after ordinary public servants just doing their jobs? When did it become normal for one man, leading a team of many, to victimize two innocent women by telling egregious lies about them, including that they were conspiring traitors such that they were no longer able to do their jobs? When did it become normal for one famous lawyer to subject two innocent women to harassment and death threats such that they had to go into hiding? When did it become normal for the guilty, wealthy victimizer to refuse to simply settle the case, draw the litigation out while continuing to defame his victims for years out of bad faith, fail to preserve and present discovery evidence and then refuse to pay after losing, going so far as to actively hide and transfer his assets?
I hope this does not become the new normal but merely a cautionary tale.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?