- Oct 12, 2022
- 2,559
- 1,343
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Married
Done with three sticky notes and GIMP.
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Woo, open source software for the win. I like this art, and it could go well in a local museum, or a mid-range 3 star hotel room for travelers. You could sell this.View attachment 351832
Done with three sticky notes and GIMP.
I do not get modern art either, but this could go well in a modern art museum.I still don't get it. I should have done better in high school.
You can assess abstract art the same as any other form, by color, composition, shapes or forms, contrast, mood, texture etc. Just no realism or representation to worry about. It’s colorful. I can see the pattern working on textiles like bedspreads, curtains, towels or area rugs as well as canvas wall art in large format.
Here’s a great Doc on Rothko by historian Schana. All of his BBC Power or Art docs are fantastic. Interesting fact and I don’t remember if mentioned in the documentary but most of the original abstract expressionists were loosely connected with some weird cult.If someone had told me it was a genuine Rothko, I wouldn't know the difference. We have a Rothko at the Virginia Museum of Fine Arts. I always go by it when I'm there. I never know what to think about it, but maybe that's the point.
Cool. Thank you!Here’s a great Doc on Rothko by historian Schana. All of his BBC Power or Art docs are fantastic. Interesting fact and I don’t remember if mentioned in the documentary but most of the original abstract expressionists were loosely connected with some weird cult.
That does not pass as a Rothko, sorry. It takes an aesthetic sense to tell the difference, but it's obvious.![]()
Which art book is it?According to a book on art I'm finding next to impossible to choke down, I probably don't have an aesthetic sense. I do know what I like and some lauded modern art isn't it.
The inspiration for the OP was the idea of AI doing that. No offense to anyone, but I looked at that, looked at the sticky notes, put three colors together, and scanned them. GIMP was to crop the scan and to fix the middle color, which the scanner didn't pick up correctly. The blotch came from not cleaning the scanner bed for a while. Not AI, but quick and cheap.
Art, by Clive Bell.Which art book is it?
Thank you. I could see if there are any PDFs of it, and have the artificial intelligence on my computer ingest it.Art, by Clive Bell.
According to a book on art I'm finding next to impossible to choke down, I probably don't have an aesthetic sense. I do know what I like and some lauded modern art isn't it.
The inspiration for the OP was the idea of AI doing that. No offense to anyone, but I looked at that, looked at the sticky notes, put three colors together, and scanned them. GIMP was to crop the scan and to fix the middle color, which the scanner didn't pick up correctly. The blotch came from not cleaning the scanner bed for a while. Not AI, but quick and cheap.
Original? I disagree. Who else does a pastiche of Rothko with sticky notes? Earth shattering? Of course not. Decorative and pleasant? Why, thank you; that's more than I hoped to achieve.Were you trying to prove a point? It isn’t earth shattering or original, just decorative and pleasant.