- Mar 11, 2018
- 274
- 97
- 60
- Country
- United Kingdom
- Faith
- Anglican
- Marital Status
- Single
I am outraged. I have righteous indignation, at the very suggestion that dinosaurs didn't exist. There are some people, who suggest that scientists make dinosaur skeletons, to sell them to museums. They fabricate these various dinosaurs out of fibreglass, plastic and plaster. I am an expert in palaeontology, and botany, and I can assure you that dinosaurs did exist, and that scientists dont make them out of plastic. I can hardly keep my composure, as I am so outraged. I would suggest that it's slanderous of our entire profession. I would go as far as to say, that these people have it in for me and my profession. Infamy! They've all got it in for me!
Allow me to educate you. Every time that you eat an egg, you are proving the existence of dinosaurs, because a chicken is a non avian dinosaur. This is a scientific fact. In fact, every time that you make an omelette, assuming that you know how to make an omelette, you have to break some eggs. Why is that so hard to understand?
We call the chicken a shrunchophyla. This is a technical term for the fact that large sauropod dinosaurs, such as the brontosaurus, reduced in size, or shrunk, over a period of between 143-178 million years BC. In fact, all small birds, such as the blue tit, are non avian dinosaurs, but blue tit eggs are too small to eat, and that would be illegal anyway in the UK, as the blue tit is a protected species, and so are its eggs. So I'm not suggesting that we all go out looking for blue tit eggs to prove the existence of dinosaurs! There are much more obvious proofs.
Take for example, the humble emu, a native of Argentina and Paraguay. The emu evolved from the aracno-diploids over a period of some 268 million years. Its a miracle of evolution. Due to cladistic branching, the emu then evolved into the kiwi, a native of the Suva island archipelago of Fiji. Due to the harsh climate of Fiji, the kiwi is covered in a thick coat of fur. The kiwi also has a long proboscis, commonly believed to be, erroneously, a beak, which the kiwi uses to pluck worms out of the mud on the beaches of Suva. The kiwi has webbed feet and is a strong swimmer, and has a thick layer of subcutaneous blubber. In fact the kiwi is the only mammal known to have this blubber. Another miracle of evolution.
Jungle Surfer on YouTube posted a video, suggesting that the stomach of the brontosaurus would fall out, as there's nothing to hold in all that weight. Jungle Surfer said that the neck was too long, and so was the tail. I don't think that's very scientific. I would go so far as to say that it is unscientific. We know that brontosaurus roamed the streets of Bangkok, way before the advent of man.
So what to make of all this. Did dinosaurs exist, or not? To me, just looking at the distribution of all the various species of triceratops, that they all seem to originate in the USA, makes me wonder, if the triceratops arose in the USA, because they were made in the USA, in dinosaur making factories, by scientists? Could my righteous indignation be misplaced? What about pterodactyls? How were these creatures supposed to of caught fish or whatever? They are depicted as plucking fish off the surface of the sea water. Doubtful. Gannets and cormorants need to dive into water to catch fish, and they have proper wings that can fold backwards, and they can actually get out of the water again, and fly. No bird can just stick its beak into the water and pluck out fish. Aint happening. Bats use echo location, and have proper feet with claws, so that they can grab fish from the surface of water, but they have located the fish first, by echo location. Ospreys and fish eagles have good sight, and can see fish on the surface, and can then use their feet to grab the fish. Have a look at the pterodactyls and show me how they could have caught anything to eat, even if they could of actually flown, with those primitive wings - and I don't think so.
The premise is that the dinosaur constructions that are displayed in museums are a hoax. That people have become very skilled at making fake dinosaurs, dino-birds, pterodactyls.. not specifically for some nefarious evolutionist agenda, but that there is much money to be made out of hoaxing that, and selling it to a trusting public.
Allow me to educate you. Every time that you eat an egg, you are proving the existence of dinosaurs, because a chicken is a non avian dinosaur. This is a scientific fact. In fact, every time that you make an omelette, assuming that you know how to make an omelette, you have to break some eggs. Why is that so hard to understand?
We call the chicken a shrunchophyla. This is a technical term for the fact that large sauropod dinosaurs, such as the brontosaurus, reduced in size, or shrunk, over a period of between 143-178 million years BC. In fact, all small birds, such as the blue tit, are non avian dinosaurs, but blue tit eggs are too small to eat, and that would be illegal anyway in the UK, as the blue tit is a protected species, and so are its eggs. So I'm not suggesting that we all go out looking for blue tit eggs to prove the existence of dinosaurs! There are much more obvious proofs.
Take for example, the humble emu, a native of Argentina and Paraguay. The emu evolved from the aracno-diploids over a period of some 268 million years. Its a miracle of evolution. Due to cladistic branching, the emu then evolved into the kiwi, a native of the Suva island archipelago of Fiji. Due to the harsh climate of Fiji, the kiwi is covered in a thick coat of fur. The kiwi also has a long proboscis, commonly believed to be, erroneously, a beak, which the kiwi uses to pluck worms out of the mud on the beaches of Suva. The kiwi has webbed feet and is a strong swimmer, and has a thick layer of subcutaneous blubber. In fact the kiwi is the only mammal known to have this blubber. Another miracle of evolution.
Jungle Surfer on YouTube posted a video, suggesting that the stomach of the brontosaurus would fall out, as there's nothing to hold in all that weight. Jungle Surfer said that the neck was too long, and so was the tail. I don't think that's very scientific. I would go so far as to say that it is unscientific. We know that brontosaurus roamed the streets of Bangkok, way before the advent of man.
So what to make of all this. Did dinosaurs exist, or not? To me, just looking at the distribution of all the various species of triceratops, that they all seem to originate in the USA, makes me wonder, if the triceratops arose in the USA, because they were made in the USA, in dinosaur making factories, by scientists? Could my righteous indignation be misplaced? What about pterodactyls? How were these creatures supposed to of caught fish or whatever? They are depicted as plucking fish off the surface of the sea water. Doubtful. Gannets and cormorants need to dive into water to catch fish, and they have proper wings that can fold backwards, and they can actually get out of the water again, and fly. No bird can just stick its beak into the water and pluck out fish. Aint happening. Bats use echo location, and have proper feet with claws, so that they can grab fish from the surface of water, but they have located the fish first, by echo location. Ospreys and fish eagles have good sight, and can see fish on the surface, and can then use their feet to grab the fish. Have a look at the pterodactyls and show me how they could have caught anything to eat, even if they could of actually flown, with those primitive wings - and I don't think so.
The premise is that the dinosaur constructions that are displayed in museums are a hoax. That people have become very skilled at making fake dinosaurs, dino-birds, pterodactyls.. not specifically for some nefarious evolutionist agenda, but that there is much money to be made out of hoaxing that, and selling it to a trusting public.
Last edited: