Here is an excerpt from an interesting article that relates to the thread...
[FONT=Times New Roman, Times, Arial]by Father Paul Scalia[/FONT]
[FONT=Times New Roman, Times, Arial]
Imagine the following scene: You arrive at Mass on Sunday, eager to thank God for His goodness to you. You slide into the pew early, kneel in prayer, and direct your praise and worship to your Lord and God. You stand as the song leader introduces the opening hymn: "Table of Plenty". Suddenly your praise comes to a screeching halt, not because of your own prayers, but because of what you are singing. In fact you are no longer praising God at all, but singing to the others:[/FONT]
[FONT=Times New Roman, Times, Arial]Come to the feast of heaven and earth!
Come to the table of plenty!
God will provide for all that we need,
here at the table of plenty.[/FONT]
[FONT=Times New Roman, Times, Arial]
Now it gets worse: you begin to sing His lines:[/FONT]
[FONT=Times New Roman, Times, Arial]O, come and sit at my table
where saints and sinners are friends.
I wait to welcome the lost and lonely
to share the cup of my love.[/FONT]
[FONT=Times New Roman, Times, Arial]
And so at the very beginning of Mass, your conversation with God is derailed and transformed into a participation in the congregation's introspection.[/FONT]
[FONT=Times New Roman, Times, Arial]
To appreciate the damage done by such hymns, we must first call to mind two essential aspects of the Mass: presence and dialogue. First of all, what distinguishes the Mass from all other forms of worship is the re-presentation of Christ's sacrifice. The Mass does not merely recall or reenact Christ's redemptive act but in fact makes present the mystery of faith, the passion, death and resurrection of Christ (cf. Catechism of the Catholic Church, 1366).[/FONT]
[FONT=Times New Roman, Times, Arial]
Second, the presence of Christ in the Eucharist and indeed throughout the Mass makes possible a real dialogue between God and man; it creates an active conversation. The remembrance of someone does not lead to dialogue with that person; only to reminiscing. The presence of Christ in the Mass, however, inspires us to speak to Him as only the beloved can speak to the Lover. Thus the Mass is a dialogue between Christ and the Church, between God and man, in which God speaks His lines and we speak ours. He speaks to us through the readings and (we hope) the homily, while we respond to Him through the prayers of the priest, our personal prayers, and the hymns.[/FONT]
[FONT=Times New Roman, Times, Arial]
Accordingly, active participation at Mass requires the faithful to acknowledge the presence of Christ and enter the dialogue, taking the words of the Bride as their own. They embody the Bride, and their Mass parts -- the Kyrie, Gloria, Sanctus, and Agnus Dei ­ express her desire for union with the Bridegroom. Other texts used at Mass should reflect and deepen this sentiment. The dialogue reaches its culmination at the Consecration, when the Bridegroom speaks His definitive words of love and thus becomes really present to His Bride in the Eucharist.[/FONT]
[FONT=Times New Roman, Times, Arial]
Given the lyrics of much contemporary liturgical music, however, we must ask what has become of this dialogue and our ability to enter it. Many hymns have us sing only about ourselves and to ourselves, even going so far as to usurp God's part. Such words fail to convey the true meaning of the Mass as a dialogue between Christ and the Church. The offending lyrics come in two varieties: in the first, we sing to one another and about one another, but do not include God in the conversation; and in the second, we sing God's parts.[/FONT]
[FONT=Times New Roman, Times, Arial]The Cult of Conceit: Why Are We Singing to Each Other?[/FONT]
[FONT=Times New Roman, Times, Arial]
A conversation demands that we include the other in the discussion. If someone speaks to you about himself, about you, about himself and you, but never really with you, you would call that person conceited. So have we become in our conversation with God: He humbles Himself to dwell among us under the form of bread and wine, while we ignore Him and sing about ourselves and to ourselves.[/FONT]
[FONT=Times New Roman, Times, Arial]
Of course, many traditional hymns also address the other believers rather than God. But a close look at such hymns (for example, "Now thank we all our God", "Praise, my soul, the King of heaven", or "Ye watchers and ye holy ones") reveals a crucial difference: the traditional hymns address others only to invite them to worship God, while most contemporary songs invite us to glorify ourselves.[/FONT]
[FONT=Times New Roman, Times, Arial]
"Bread of Life" by Rory Cooney, provides a splendid example of this self-centered conversation. The theme of the song lends itself to the Communion rite. But unfortunately, the words distort the meaning of Communion and the dialogue that should be taking place:[/FONT]
[FONT=Times New Roman, Times, Arial]I myself am the bread of life
you and I are the bread of life
taken and blessed, broken and shared
by Christ
that the world may live.[/FONT]
[FONT=Times New Roman, Times, Arial]
Aside from the fact that this song radically distorts Our Lord 's "Bread of Life" discourse, it also leaves God out of the conversation: we talk to ourselves. As the communicants come forward to receive the living God, they are singing about themselves. "Sing a New Church", a triumphalist paean to diversity by Delores Dufner, OSB, also fosters the Cult of Us:[/FONT]
[FONT=Times New Roman, Times, Arial]Let us bring the gifts that differ
And, in splendid, varied ways,
Sing a new Church into being,
One in faith and love and praise[/FONT]
[FONT=Times New Roman, Times, Arial]
So the chorus goes, and the verses similarly proclaim us to ourselves. Passing over the tremendous ecclesiological problems in the text, we should question what the song communicates to the congregation: songs about us constitute worship of the Almighty. We have replaced Him as the focus of worship.[/FONT]
[FONT=Times New Roman, Times, Arial]
A favorite Communion song in some parishes is "This Bread That We Share" by Dominic MacAller:[/FONT]
[FONT=Times New Roman, Times, Arial]This bread that we share is the body of Christ,
this cup of blessing his blood.
We who come to this table bring all our wounds to be healed.
When we love one another as Christ has loved us,
we become God's daughters and sons.
We become for each other the bread, the cup,
the presence of Christ revealed.[/FONT]
[FONT=Times New Roman, Times, Arial]
Again the words, which clumsily try to convey the beautiful theology of the Mystical Body, foster in the congregation a focus on itself at the very moment that it should be speaking to and about Himself.[/FONT]
[FONT=Times New Roman, Times, Arial]
One of the worst offenders in this cult of conceit is a song called "Anthem" by Tom Conry:[/FONT]
[FONT=Times New Roman, Times, Arial]We are called, we are chosen.
We are Christ for one another.
We are promise to tomorrow,
while we are for him today.
We are sign, we are wonder,
we are sower, we are seed.
We are harvest, we are hunger.
We are question, we are creed.[/FONT]
[FONT=Times New Roman, Times, Arial]
Count them: 13 separate uses of "I" or "we" in these lines. Nor do the verses help: they do not sing to Christ, but only about Him and to ... us! Although the verses do emphasize our inadequacy before God and dependence on Him, nevertheless, the dialogue with the Almighty has been shut down, and we sing to one another about one another and only secondarily about Him, the object of all our affections.[/FONT]
[FONT=Times New Roman, Times, Arial]
Songs such as these give us a wonderfully ridiculous image of a bride so enamoured with herself that she cannot see the Bridegroom awaiting her at the altar.[/FONT]
Ritus Narcissus