Revival

[FreeinChrist]

What's going here is that the "Dispensationalism" thread has been almost completely hi-jacked by Hyper Dispensationalists.

Especially this "Eph3nine" person has apparently taken it on herself to host if not dominate the section with words like: "happy to have you here" and the like....

It would be better if a separate section were created were these hyper dispies can exclusively and heartily discuss their peculiar theological concepts.

Seems to me that the whole forum has bween hijacked by hyperdespensationists.
I consider hyperdispensationism to be a heresy.

 

[FreeinChrist]

Firstly I am not a dispensationalist.

Since when??

Seems I remember you being the one to argue for this paritular forum to share dispensational views.

 

[TheScottsMen]

Since when??

Seems I remember you being the one to argue for this paritular forum to share dispensational views.

I thought AV1611 used to have "In full-agreement with John Darby" next to his name? Anyways, I think four sub-forums should be created; An Acts 2, Acts 9-13, Acts 28, and Progressive. I think it would be abit unfair to just put the Mid-Acts believers in a sub-forum to get them out the way and leave the main forum for Acts 2.

 

[eph3Nine]

I thought AV1611 used to have "In full-agreement with John Darby" next to his name? Anyways, I think four sub-forums should be created; An Acts 2, Acts 9-13, Acts 28, and Progressive. I think it would be abit unfair to just put the Mid-Acts believers in a sub-forum to get them out the way and leave the main forum for Acts 2.

Oh but that is exactly what they want, scottsmen. To get us out of the way.

I dont even consider Acts 2 to BE dispensational...they are in the wrong program to begin with....wink.

But I agree with ya...they should split things up into four sub forums....then we wouldnt have to deal with all the other stuff. I hate being repetitive, when no ones listening, but I do thank God for the ones who HAVE seen right division from our efforts to explain it here. THAT is a good thing.