Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
But itś not against the rules to pose as one i guess...
I guess so..
Yet it is allowed to pose as one...
Is should have put it like: I'm sorry, but i can't believe you're a Christian or even a theist, Derek Meyer.
I am allowed to say i don't believe it or find it hard or impossible to believe.And you're still doing it! You are not allowed, period, to say that a post is not a Christian, is only posing as a Christian or anything for the sort. Full stop.
It's there to illustrate the consensus and the commitment to naturalism.Sorry, google threw up another quote mine, the wording is very similar....
Actually, looking again, the quote mine page I linked to had a different quote by L.T More from a book he wrote called T'he Dogma of Evolution'.
Funnily enough he was a Physicist and Dean of Cincinnatti University and he wrote his book in .....1925. I don't think we need to rip up our text books on his say so.
I am allowed to say i don't believe it or find it hard or impossible to believe.
And that's what i should have said.
The way he looks at things, makes it impossible to believe in Christ's virgin birth, his Divinity, his resurrection i.m.o.
No, but when you deny the creeds, how can you still be one?And you're still breaking the rules on questioning whether a poster who has labelled themselves as one is Christian or not. You can think it, but keep it to yourself.
Also, you do not speak for what a Christian has to believe for them to be a Christian or not. You do not speak for God.
No, but when you deny the creeds, how can you still be one?
I think it's not possible.
True, but why deny Godś Creation then?But evolution does not invalidate the Virgin Birth or the Resurrection.
Lie...Evolution is only on the development of the species of life we see on Earth throughout history.
Are you sure it's not 99.999%?It says nothing about the story of Jesus.
And, as has been stated to you before, 98% of Christians in Europe accept evolution.
You've obviously never heard of theistic evolution then. Not that surprising....True, but why deny Godś Creation then?
How can you marry these things?
You've never shown that anything I've said is a lie. You've claimed it, but never given any actual scientific evidence.Lie...
You really should try and act your age.Are you sure it's not 99.999%?
It's not about denying God's creation. It's about reconciling it with the overwhelming evidence supporting an old earth and evolution.True, but why deny Godś Creation then?
duh..Of course i have.You've obviously never heard of theistic evolution then. Not that surprising....
duh..Of course i have.
It's what i used to believe: Guided evolution (that is in fact slow creation).
But it also lacks evidence, but has counter evidence in the so called 'cambrian explosion'.
All right, this ought to be fun. Please explain why the cambrian explosion refutes theistic evolution.But it also lacks evidence, but has counter evidence in the so called 'cambrian explosion'.
I think there's a lot of theophobia behind it, why they can't allow a divine foot in the door.
I rather put my faith in what the Bible.
They overwhelm us with evolutionary thinking, that's true..It's not about denying God's creation. It's about reconciling it with the overwhelming evidence supporting an old earth and evolution.
In the mean time "mitochondrial Eve" seems to be identified as factual and historical.
And the tight bottle-neck of the Flood too.
In Genesis 10 we find the Table of Nations (after Babel), which turns out to be accurate.
What is so attractive about God not existing?
Would mankind suddenly live in peace?
Baloney.The "divine" isn't allowed a foot in the door for the exact same reason as poltergeists and invisible unicorns not being allowed a foot in the door. Because there is no evidence to support their existence,
Both sides have this problem.nore any way to test and / or falsify it.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?