Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Try one what?In terms of using cladogram, it can not "confirm" evolution in logic. If you don't believe, then try one. You WILL see that the illogic part is quite obvious.
They predicted one, but failed one hundred.
Of course, they won't tell you those failures.
They predicted one, but failed one hundred.
Of course, they won't tell you those failures.
Please enlighten us.
Because when I ask the question, they can not answer.If they don't tell us the failures, how do you know about them?
the design scenario also predict such a tree:
View attachment 246343
are you saying now that id is true?
Your tree is a cheat because you get to place the objects on it at your own whim, rather than being restricted to how and when the objects actually occurred.the design scenario also predict such a tree:
View attachment 246343
are you saying now that id is true?
Sorry, I am not a biologist. I can criticize, but I can not teach.
Because when I ask the question, they can not answer.
evolution actually predict nothing. so any finding will fit by definition. we find hierarcy? evolution is true. we found non hierarchy? evolution is true etc. id also predict a tree as you can see above.
Sorry, I am not a biologist. I can criticize, but I can not teach.
the design scenario also predict such a tree:
View attachment 246343
are you saying now that id is true?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?