• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Removing the laws of God- what does it really mean?

Nathan@work

Always ready :)
Feb 19, 2021
1,025
360
46
Garfield
✟34,517.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married

Wouldnt that be an oxymoron, Eve being deceived but willingly sinned?

Doubt is different than deception. Nowhere does it say that Eve doubted God or think that He was somehow withholding something from them.

We have to remember that they had no knowledge of evil at the time.

*Eve did not know she was doing wrong because they had no knowledge of wrong.

My discussion is not directed at one law. I know you feel that way because that is the one law that SDA puts higher than the rest(sometimes intentionally, sometimes not). I am well aware of this. I have experience with this.

My discussion is about the entire law. God's commandments are inseparable from each other. Break one, break them all. Moses exemplified this when he came down off the mountain.
 
Reactions: Leaf473
Upvote 0

Nathan@work

Always ready :)
Feb 19, 2021
1,025
360
46
Garfield
✟34,517.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Yes.
Psalms 111:7 The works of his hands are verity and judgment; all his commandments are sure. 8 They stand fast for ever and ever, and are done in truth and uprightness.

Ok, just to make I understand you correctly. They were commandments to all mankind from Adam on?

I am not saying I disagree, I just want to make sure of the basis for this discussion.
 
Upvote 0

SabbathBlessings

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jun 12, 2020
13,456
5,526
USA
✟710,109.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
This will be quick because I have to run but can explain later.

That is not true we do not put one law above another. The only law that seems to be continually attacked is God's 4th commandment that He said to "REMEMBER". God made this commandment different, maybe because He knew people would forget. Breaking any of God's laws is considered sinning including the 4th. Most churches agree with 9 out of the 10 or 8 out of the 10. SDA's and some other Sabbath-keeping churches believe in all 10 commandments because they are eternal and Jesus answered, “It is written: ‘Man shall not live on bread alone, but on every word that comes from the mouth of God.’” Mathew 4:4

Also I don't think it's an oxymoron that Eve was deceived and willingly sinned. God gave her a commandment. She believed the "other spirit" instead of God which is still happening today.

Hope you have a blessed day, will check in later.
 
Reactions: LoveGodsWord
Upvote 0

SabbathBlessings

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jun 12, 2020
13,456
5,526
USA
✟710,109.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Ok, just to make I understand you correctly. They were commandments to all mankind from Adam on?

I am not saying I disagree, I just want to make sure of the basis for this discussion.
I think they were established before Adam. God created the Sabbath from the beginning (Genesis 2:2,3) and we will be worshipping God on Sabbath forever in Heaven Isaiah 66:23. I think its reasonable to believe God's laws which we are told are eternal started before Adam. Lucifer was thrown out of Heaven for sinning, so there had to be laws in Heaven.
 
Reactions: LoveGodsWord
Upvote 0

Leaf473

Well-Known Member
Jul 17, 2020
9,301
2,554
55
Northeast
✟239,849.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Great question!
I would say no, because the Sabbath was made for humans, and there was a time when there were no humans.
 
Upvote 0

Nathan@work

Always ready :)
Feb 19, 2021
1,025
360
46
Garfield
✟34,517.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married

If the commands were created, then that would mean they are not eternal.

Interesting side note I noticed when I hovered over the Isaiah 66:23 link. Isaiah speaks of "one new moon to the next".

But when you read Revelation, there is not going to be any night.

We know God created the "lights in the expanses"(the moon being one) in order for signs and seasons.

In eternity it does not seem this is needed any longer.

Do you believe people will be able to break God's commands in eternity?
 
Upvote 0

Leaf473

Well-Known Member
Jul 17, 2020
9,301
2,554
55
Northeast
✟239,849.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Which particular statement in my post do you feel God's word disagrees with?
 
Upvote 0

Leaf473

Well-Known Member
Jul 17, 2020
9,301
2,554
55
Northeast
✟239,849.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
The part in James comes to mind about how we all sin in many ways.
 
Upvote 0

Leaf473

Well-Known Member
Jul 17, 2020
9,301
2,554
55
Northeast
✟239,849.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
"Nowhere does it say that Eve doubted God or think that He was somehow withholding something from them."

Now that you say that, I believe you are correct!

It's something we read into the text, and it's so common that we don't even realize it anymore.
 
Upvote 0

Leaf473

Well-Known Member
Jul 17, 2020
9,301
2,554
55
Northeast
✟239,849.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
The Sabbath command or the Sabbath day was made for humans?
I don't think the Sabbath command could be separated from the Sabbath day, the Seventh day. That's how I see it. How do you see it?
 
Upvote 0

Davy

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Nov 25, 2017
4,861
1,022
USA
✟291,297.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Those were sin against the Ten Commandments, which were the moral law, and which were not removed, but were written on our hearts (Heb 8:10), and subsumed in Jesus' two commandments (Mt 22:37-40; Ro 13:8-10).

God's law against murder, manslayer, etc., is about the civil law, as five of the Ten Commandments are about the civil relations between man and man, and the other five are between God and man. God's law against prostitution is not in the Ten Commandments, neither is sodomy, nor perjury, so Apostle Paul in 1 Timothy 1 is definitely referring to God's laws and not just to the Ten Commandments or what some call the "moral law". Further proof that this is so is easy, since these laws are still on the books in many states in the U.S. and western society in general.

One of the things I find many brethren in Christ fail to understand regarding God's law in Christian society is their lack of knowledge that God gave the tribe of Judah the responsibility of lawgiver all the way up to the return of our Lord Jesus Christ. This specifically is one of the prophecies that Jacob gave to his son Judah, including for the last days.

Gen 49:1
And Jacob called unto his sons, and said, "Gather yourselves together, that I may tell you that which shall befall you in the last days."
KJV


Gen 49:9-12
9 Judah is a lion's whelp: from the prey, my son, thou art gone up: he stooped down, he couched as a lion, and as an old lion; who shall rouse him up?

10 The sceptre shall not depart from Judah, nor a lawgiver from between his feet, until Shiloh come; and unto him shall the gathering of the people be.


11 Binding his foal unto the vine, and his ass's colt unto the choice vine; he washed his garments in wine, and his clothes in the blood of grapes:
12 His eyes shall be red with wine, and his teeth white with milk.
KJV



That is why even Jews that believe on Jesus still have a propensity to try and keep God's laws. He gave it to them for to protect the rest of us in a peaceful society. So really arguments trying to do away with God's laws is really stupid, because God has ordained Judah (Jews) to be lawgiver among His people all the way up to Christ's future return. That is what Apostle Paul in 1 Timothy 1 says God's law is for, not to protect sinners and the ungodly, but to protect the righteous. Seeking to remove God's laws in Christian society is of the devil and the children of darkness.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Davy

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Nov 25, 2017
4,861
1,022
USA
✟291,297.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private

The ten tribe northern kingdom after Solomon's days, called the "house of Israel", or just "Israel", or "Samaria", or "Ephraim", or "kingdom of Israel", was scattered to Assyria and the lands of the Medes, never to return in majority. They are still scattered out of the holy land to this day. Only a small remnant of the northern ten tribes chose to trek south and join with the "house of Judah" at Jerusalem when king Jeroboam of Ephraim setup the two gold calf idols in false worship.

Per Ezra 1:5, and Ezra 2, none... of the northern ten tribes of Israel are mentioned returning. The 'only'... tribes mentioned returning are the tribes of Judah and Benjamin, and some of the Levites, and strangers that went captive to Babylon with them, including the Nethinims which were the leftover Canaanites that became temple servants.

The Jewish historian Josephus (100 A.D.) said the ten tribes of Israel were still scattered beyond Euphrates in his day, and were a great number.

So I don't know where some get the idea that the ten tribes of Israel returned already, because that is pure myth, not Biblical nor historical.
 
Upvote 0

Clare73

Blood-bought
Jun 12, 2012
29,369
7,574
North Carolina
✟347,514.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Thanks, I will examine them.

But keep in mind that the issue in Heb 4:1-13 is not about Hebrews failing to observe the Sabbath, but about some NT Hebrews who, because of persecution by the Jews and threatened disinheritance from their families, were considering a return to their OT religion, which the writer of Hebrews characterizes as failing to enter God's full-time Sabbath-rest because of unbelief.
Indeed. . .and in Scripture we find no giving of the day of God's rest to mankind until the Mosaic Covenant (Exodus 19:3-8) conditions (Exodus 20:11), so we must not, and cannot assume that it was given earlier.
6. Shadow laws point "forward" to things to come not backwards to things completed which the Sabbath and God's 4th commandments points back to.
Types, patterns, shadows are physical realities that point to spiritual realities to come.

Hebrews 4:1-13 reveals the New Covenant spiritual reality of the physical rest of the Old Covenant Sabbath day for the people of God, which emphasis was on rest (Exodus 23:3; Deuteronomy 5:14), and about which God was most emphatic (Exodus 31:14-15, 35:2-3; Numbers 15:32-36; Jeremiah 17:21-22, 27). In light of its NT eternal spiritual reality of salvation-rest in Christ, we can see why so much emphasis was placed by God on rest.

It is God's own full-time (v.3b) Sabbath-rest (Hebrews 4:10) we enter into in the NT full-time spiritual salvation-rest of Jesus Christ, where we rest from our work to save and rest in Jesus finished work which saves, and which these NT Hebrews were in danger of not entering by returning to their OT religion.
7. JESUS is the Lord and creator of the Sabbath and kept it as a holy day of rest and taught us how to correctly keep the Sabbath the way he intended it to be kept.
Jesus taught us how to keep all the Levitical laws which are no longer in force--sacrifices, feasts, days, years, etc., not just how to keep the Sabbath.
8. The Sabbath will continue to be kept after the second coming in the new heavens and new earth. *Isaiah 66:22-23.
Yes, for all eternity, we will rest in the finished work of Christ on the cross. The spiritual Sabbath-rest of Hebrews 4:1-13 is eternal, as is the priesthood of Melchizedek, the removal of sin by the atoning sacrifice for those in Christ, the adoption as sons of God, the gift of the Holy Spirit, etc. are all eternal.
In relation to the physical rest of Ex 20, which your responder here maintains, what does that even mean--labor to rest?
HEBREWS 3 is not about the Sabbath-rest of Ex 20. It is about the NT spiritual Sabbath rest in Jesus Christ which is entered into only through belief.
Hebrews 3 and Hebrews 4 are talking about both the Gospel rest of believing and following God's word;
That is faith. How is faith related to the physical rest of the Sabbath commanded by God in Ex 20? There is no connection in Heb 3 and 4 between believing God's word and the physical Sabbath rest of Ex 20.
Association of texts is not connection of texts.

The gospel preached to the OT Hebrews which they did not believe (Heb 4:2) was not the gospel of Mt 11, it was the gospel preached to Abraham (Galatians 3:8). So the association being made here is:
Mt 11 light burden-->gospel preached, not believed-->Sabbath physical rest. There is no connection in that association.

Again, association of texts is not connection of texts.

Faith is the issue here, and is not addressed in the explanation above. Hebrews 4:3 shows that the writer of Hebrews is using the example of Israel's refusal to go into Canaan--because of unbelief, causing God to shut out (Numbers 14:21-35) a whole generation of Israelites (Hebrews 4:3) from the Canaan-rest from their enemies--as a warning not to refuse to go into NT salvation-rest because of unbelief, a warning not to return to their OT religion.
This agrees with Hebrews 4:1-5 where the topic is not our rest but God’s rest
The topic is our entering (v.1) into God's full-time rest (v.3b) of salvation without works. There is a spiritual rest remaining for the people of faith, in God's own full-time Sabbath-rest. Faith is not related to physical rest, it is related to God's full-time spiritual salvation-rest in Jesus Christ.
NT Hebrews are being warned to keep the Sabbath? Hardly.

Actually, it's Hebrews 4:9-11 showing that
Canaan rest was no longer available (Hebrews 4:3),
but there still remains a spiritual Sabbath-rest in God for those NT Hebrews, which was not a rest from physical works, but rest from spiritual works to earn salvation.
because God again set a certain day, calling it TODAY (Hebrews 4:6-7),
which is not rest in Canaan whose doors are closed (Hebrews 4:3),
but is the full-time Sabbath-rest of God, in the finished work of Jesus Christ on the cross, where the believer rests full-time from his own spiritual works to save and rests in Christ's work which has saved.

I think I have to conclude that your responder here
1) did not address Heb 4:1-13 in its context; i.e., failing to enter God's full-time Sabbath rest due to unbelief, and that
2) he regards what he personally sees as associations to be actual linking connections in Scripture.

Association does not establish connection of texts, and is a much-flawed hermeneutic being used by some on these threads.

Complete exegesis of Heb 3:7-4:13 is found in
post #1259,
Removing the laws of God- what does it really mean?
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Clare73

Blood-bought
Jun 12, 2012
29,369
7,574
North Carolina
✟347,514.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
"Nowhere does it say that Eve doubted God or think that He was somehow withholding something from them."

Now that you say that, I believe you are correct!

It's something we read into the text, and it's so common that we don't even realize it anymore.
Check out what Satan told her. . .God was withholding something good from them.
 
Upvote 0

Nathan@work

Always ready :)
Feb 19, 2021
1,025
360
46
Garfield
✟34,517.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
I don't think the Sabbath command could be separated from the Sabbath day, the Seventh day. That's how I see it. How do you see it?

Well, we were talking about the 10 commandments being eternal or not. If they are not, then the Sabbath command is not. However, we know the Sabbath day(actual day) was a created one - so it cannot be eternal.

So, to answer the question, it all depends on how you view the definition. I believe they are separate but intrinsic.

Me, God's law is eternal because it is a part of Him. The 'purpose' of His law can change states without it changing who He is.

There will never be a time when He will allow us to have other gods before Him. However, there will be a time when we will not consider having other gods before him.

There will never be a time when we will be allowed to murder. However, there will be a time when we will not even consider murdering(on any level including hating our brother).

The principle can be applied to all the commandments.
 
Reactions: Leaf473
Upvote 0