This for me is really odd - the idea that the spiritual grace and value attached to virginity should make one less sinful in the eyes of God. I just don't get it, it's not Orthodox, I haven't seen anyone argue that position and subsequently don't get the ire or objections that people make to that idea.
Perhaps I perceived (misperceived?) a more prominent note of self-congratulation, of moral "compare and contrast", in the original post than did you, sir. While no one argued that "virginity makes one less sinful" in quite those words, the OP did ask if there was anything wrong with being "proud of [her] purity". Virginity before marriage is of course wonderful and right, which is why I've made that same choice--but it does not provide a "purity", in my mind, of which to be proud. Is not purity defined by so much more than that choice?
Also imbedded in the OP's question was the admission of pride. Should one be
proud of one's virginity ("purity")? Should one be proud
at all? I'm inclined to say "no, one shouldn't". Pride and self-congratulation are better replaced with humility (of which I need much more) and deep gratefulness (also lacking, thenkyewverymuch) for God's grace and protection in this area.
Perhaps I sound (am?) too severe or judgmental, and if that's the case, I ask forgiveness. Perhaps it's because I'm aware of my own pride regarding the issue (I've learned, often the painful way, that I have very little reason to be proud of "my" righteousness), aware of my own ability to mask self-righteous pride as a humble lament, simply to afford me the opportunity to toot my horn undetected (have I done so in these posts?).
To answer the OP's question regarding why more people don't remain virgins until marriage:
1) Sex feels good-to-awesome.
2) The reproductive drive is a powerfully imbedded biological (near-) imperative.
3) Sex (inappropriately and incompletely, if premarital) fills a hunger for companionship, affection and intimacy in a way that other interactions do not.
4) Popular culture is an effective enabler.
5) Outside of the context of a sincere Christian faith, there is little philosophical imperative to resist biology.
King David, who had no shortage of wives and concubines, killed an innocent man to sate his appetite--that pesky libido can pack a mean punch.
I'm a bit tired, so it's very possible I'm being a jerk without knowing it--I trust you'll kindly let me know if that's the case
