Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
In one post you differentiate between God and Jesus and when called out for it you don't address it you just keep rambling on about something else
Look who was behind those things in all three linksGod might be in three persons but it appears that these persons have been fighting and killing each other, in the name of their particular version of God, for centuries.
crusades history - Google Search
Inquisition - Wikipedia
European wars of religion - Wikipedia
OB
If you're trying to hint that it's all the fault of Catholics - think again.Look who was behind those things in all three links
It's strange I know a lot of Christians and none of them ever killed anyone or heard a voice telling them to. You throw out the baby with the bathwaterIf you're trying to hint that it's all the fault of Catholics - think again.
Firstly - like it or not - Catholics are Christians
Secondly - like it or not - Protestants have done their share of killing in the name of God
I'm afraid you have a lot to learn.
OB
Ever heard of Craig Stephen HicksIf you're trying to hint that it's all the fault of Catholics - think again.
Firstly - like it or not - Catholics are Christians
Secondly - like it or not - Protestants have done their share of killing in the name of God
I'm afraid you have a lot to learn.
OB
Ever heard of Craig Stephen Hicks
Look further. He was an aggressive atheist who hated people of all religions.I had to look him up. He's an American who killed three Muslims back in 2015.
What's you point?
OB
In spite of the Bible.God might be in three persons but it appears that these persons have been fighting and killing each other, in the name of their particular version of God, for centuries.
So disagreeing with someone on a forum is immoral?
I take pot shots on here but so do you.
I thought you were going to educate me about abiogenesis. You just make irrational attacks. What example do you set?A very telling defense of:
Either you genuinely were confused regarding what I was asking, or you are being disingenuous.
The former torpedoes your credibility because if you can't follow my words, what chance do you have getting the Bible right? And the latter simply makes you a poor role model and a cautionary tale about what becoming a "Christian" does to a person's character.
I thought you were going to educate me about abiogenesis.
You just make irrational attacks.
What example do you set?
You asked if I was willing to learn. You haven't offered anything. You hold me to the highest standards but there is no accountability at all for you. Whose example does an atheist follow?We made no such arrangement.
If you can't follow a conversation and/or won't accept moral instruction, you're not making a strong case for accepting any other lessons... and none whatsoever for giving any.
Irrelevant. Who is your role model -- Jesus Christ, or me?
Why is this so difficult to grasp? It's not that God could have wiped out everyone that's the problem. The problem is maintaining that it would have been acceptable by an omnipotent God.
Are you not reading the posts?
You'll happily fall back on your unsupported assertion that God's morality must be different to ours while ignoring the morality God is claimed to have given in the bible as well as ignoring Genesis 3:22Ok. And are you reading the Bible and applying Hermeneutics? Or are you just doing what so many people already do ... essentially just flap open the bible and read some isolated tid-bit without thinking and without critical thinking and literary study?
I'm guessing that in your case, it's the latter.
But I get what you're saying: your concern is with maintaining the present status quo "world think," and you expect that it shouldn't be questioned.
The thing is, I'm going to question everything, both the Biblical ethics as well as so-called "Modern Values."
The point is about what the OT said God did. Not what the NT said Jesus did. Accepting the former is a problem. Accepting the latter is not. Please try to stay focussed.
You'll happily fall back on your unsupported assertion that God's morality must be different to ours while ignoring the morality God is claimed to have given in the bible as well as ignoring Genesis 3:22
If you have nothing to say, say nothing.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?