So, as a follow-up, now
Justatruthseeker has now managed
to get his CQ thread closed, presumably due to his lack of answering the questions put to him. Citing other peoples' reference material, as a way of explaining
his own claims, has perhaps, been 'seen through' by the CQ mods.
So, about his final rant:
Justatruthseeker said:
.. Except in none of your scattering have you ever considered Bremsstrahlung and the consequences thereof. All electrons in a high energy state emit photons in the "forward" direction, unlike low energy electrons which emit them isotropically.
and his earlier diatribe:
Justatruthseeker said:
I told you my theory. You all want to talk about the CMBR all the time, then let's talk about that solar wind coming to a complete stop at the heliosphere - in a 360 degree sphere around us. You can't put the genie back in the bottle. Until mainstream justifies ignoring the energy released from charged particles decelerating, or the brightest source in the sky - they really got no excuse for claiming CMBR anything.
Some months ago, a CF poster, '
David Bilby,' pointed out that if the CMB is l
ocal, (as Justatruthseeker implies), then there would be no observable
dipole effect of the CMB due to Doppler shift.
As explain in the above link, the simplest reason why we observe this effect is that the Earth (and galaxy) is moving relative to the CMB ... therefore the CMB cannot be local.
Secondly, another CF poster, '
sjastro,' made the point that if the CMB is due to Bremsstrahlung radiation, then why is the resultant background in the
microwave part of the spectrum and not in other frequencies such as X-ray, given that Bremsstrahlung radiation is characteristically
continuous in its spectral signature?
The simplest refutation to
Justatruthseeker's nonsense however, is that we don't observe microwave Bremsstrahlung radiation in the outer reaches of the solar system
because the environment there is equivalent to the very best laboratory vacuums ... and there is no dense medium there to initiate the Bremsstrahlung emission process.
Seeing as the above points were made many months ago, one can either assume
Justatruthseeker's ear-bashing at CQ is either the result of his not having understood, (or considered), the above points put to him many months ago, or he is simply intent on engaging continuously in deliberate dishonesty(?)
