C
Critias
Guest
Robert the Pilegrim said:Assuming you are talking about Saddam...
Citation please.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/4349406.stm
Robert the Pilegrim said:Two.
Several means more than 1.
Robert the Pilegrim said:Granted.
Not that it makes it any less of a crime but he used chemical weapons, not biological weapons.
I'm not sure what difference it makes that he used them against citizens of Iraq.
Singular: Iran. Unless you have a citation ...
Remember Kuwait?
Robert the Pilegrim said:Yup, he and his administration lied and vilified those who pointed out that their arguments were specious, then they went off half cocked in a war without planning for the aftermath thus making day-to-day life worse than it was before for many and quite possibly dooming Iraq to a protracted civil war.
By putting them in prisons for months at a time without trial, oh yup, that is a good way to protect people.
I don't feel like giving an international relations lesson, but there are good reasons that the standards for invading other countries are high.
I opposed the invasion because we had only the most threadbare of legal figleaves to justify it.
I was beyond belief trying to comprehend how poorly they pursued it.
I am hoping against hope that it will turn out well in a few years, but in the meantime we have to keep our people there to keep it from collapsing.
Many of those who opposed our invasion did not do so out of cold heartedness, but because they felt that it would do far more harm than good.
My response was not to start a debate on the subject, so if a rebuttal is followed, I won't be answering. With that said, you are most entitled to your opinion.
Upvote
0