Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Recent article by William Lane Craig suggests the historical Adam lived more than 750,000 years ago
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="essentialsaltes" data-source="post: 76283161" data-attributes="member: 294566"><p><em>I am confident that when ancient Babylonians and Egyptians looked to the sky, they saw neither the desiccated corpse of the dragon goddess Tiamat nor the naked body of the goddess Nut overhead because no such things are there to be seen. Look for yourself! If this point is correct, then why are we bound to read the narratives of Genesis 1-11 with a wooden literalness?</em></p><p></p><p>[Puts on literalist YEC hat]</p><p>Because those ancient people were deluded by counterfeits from Satan, but these ancient people were inspired by Truth from the living God!</p><p>[/literalist YEC hat]</p><p></p><p>As much as I can see his point that 'If the literal sense is nonsensical, then we probably shouldn't read it that way.' I don't think it's going to persuade anyone on the other side.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="essentialsaltes, post: 76283161, member: 294566"] [I]I am confident that when ancient Babylonians and Egyptians looked to the sky, they saw neither the desiccated corpse of the dragon goddess Tiamat nor the naked body of the goddess Nut overhead because no such things are there to be seen. Look for yourself! If this point is correct, then why are we bound to read the narratives of Genesis 1-11 with a wooden literalness?[/I] [Puts on literalist YEC hat] Because those ancient people were deluded by counterfeits from Satan, but these ancient people were inspired by Truth from the living God! [/literalist YEC hat] As much as I can see his point that 'If the literal sense is nonsensical, then we probably shouldn't read it that way.' I don't think it's going to persuade anyone on the other side. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Recent article by William Lane Craig suggests the historical Adam lived more than 750,000 years ago
Top
Bottom