• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Reason why evolution can not happen

LorentzHA

Electric Kool-Aid Girl
Aug 8, 2003
3,166
39
Dallas, Texas
✟3,521.00
Faith
Other Religion
You may find these interesting.

http://www.nmsr.org/nylon.htm
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/...2&dopt=Abstract
http://www.genome.org/cgi/content/full/12/12/1854
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/inf...ipoprotein.html
http://mbe.oupjournals.org/cgi/reprint/15/8/931.pdf
http://www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/94/8/3485
 
Upvote 0

Cantuar

Forever England
Jul 15, 2002
1,085
4
71
Visit site
✟23,889.00
Faith
Agnostic
OK, so as far as I can gather, what we're really being told here is that there are no natural processes that can increase genetic information because genetic information can't be increased by natural processes (which is a wonderful example of a circular argument) and that this should somehow make atheists realise that Christ is Lord.

Welcome to the Twilight Zone. I can see why some people have given up and gone to play cricket.
 
Upvote 0

stray bullet

God Made Me A Skeptic
Nov 16, 2002
14,875
906
✟20,457.00
Marital Status
Private
How do you define 'new information'? If my parents chromosomes all produced enzyme A, but due to a mutation, my gametes passed on a mutation that caused my child's chromosomes to sequence the production of enzyme A on one chromosome and enzyme A+ (mutated variant from me) on the other.

There is now information for coding two different enzymes. That's 'new information', there is a code for new enzyme, A+.
 
Upvote 0
J

Jet Black

Guest
Indeed he could have done. This does not however detract from the fact that it is mutations that cause variations within the population. Whether it if God changing an adenine base to a thymine, inverting a stretch of DNA, adding a base or whatever seems somewhat pointless. It also has theological problems that need to be addressed, sich as the fact that God made it look like these things happened spontaneously and at predictable rates.
 
Upvote 0

Data

Veteran
Sep 15, 2003
1,439
63
38
Auckland
✟24,359.00
Faith
Atheist
Melior said:
Maybe the 7 day creation happened, and then God changed the animals in some way afterwards. I don't know. I don't really have my own opinion on this; I was just offering a base for someone to argue with.
Changed them to look exactly like they were evolved? Then changed the earth to make it look old, and like everything evolved?

That isn't a very good argument, but it's unrefutable. He could have made us last tuesday too.
 
Upvote 0
J

Jet Black

Guest
Melior said:
Maybe the 7 day creation happened, and then God changed the animals in some way afterwards. I don't know. I don't really have my own opinion on this; I was just offering a base for someone to argue with.
The problem then becomes a theological one, since iggy the magic elf could have made everything last tuesday, and we would never know.
 
Reactions: wblastyn
Upvote 0

FEZZILLA

Well-Known Member
Jun 24, 2003
1,031
131
54
Wisconsin
✟16,495.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican
 
Upvote 0

FEZZILLA

Well-Known Member
Jun 24, 2003
1,031
131
54
Wisconsin
✟16,495.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican
I've noticed alot of you like to argue just to argue. No matter how many times the world of academics slams you in the face, you'll deny true information and get false infomation offf your far-left wing websites.
You should try thinking for yourselves sometime, it's fun!
 
Upvote 0

PhantomLlama

Prism Ranger
Feb 25, 2003
1,813
60
38
Birmingham
Visit site
✟24,758.00
Faith
Atheist
See avatar.
 
Upvote 0

toff

Well-Known Member
Dec 21, 2003
1,243
24
63
Sydney, Australia
✟24,038.00
Faith
Atheist
FEZZILLA said:
Talking Points:
#1.) Darwin saw finches mix-breeding and called it macro-evolution
No, he did not. Do you know anything about either evolutionary theory or Darwin?

FEZZILLA said:
I guess you can count-out the evolution alien theory out know You just proved aliens are not responsible for life on earth. Thats will hurt evolutions last resort tactics (hahahaha!!!).
There is no "evolution alien theory." What I THINK you are referring to is panspermia, which has absolutely nothing to do with evolutionary theory.

Again, do you know anything about the topic you're attempting to discuss?
 
Upvote 0

Physics_guy

Well-Known Member
Dec 11, 2003
1,208
66
✟1,687.00

You have got to be kidding! A YEC thinks that the "world of academics" is on his side!!!!!

This quote blew both my irony meter as well as my spare. Do you have any idea how ludicrious what you write sounds?
 
Upvote 0

Nathan Poe

Well-Known Member
Sep 21, 2002
32,198
1,693
51
United States
✟41,319.00
Faith
Agnostic
Politics
US-Democrat
FEZZILLA said:
________________________________________________________________
Talking Points:
#1.) Darwin saw finches mix-breeding and called it macro-evolution
nobody claimed Darwin was infallible; Scientists have been picking apart his work for 150 years now, correcting his mistakes.

#2.) Thats because Genesis was not written about Moses! [note: No ad hominem] Exodus on the other hand is where we get to the account of Moses.
That wouldn't explain Leviticus, Numbers, and Deutoronomy, all of which were credited to Moses, little of which is about him, but follows the same theme of Exodus, but not Genesis.

#3.) The word "circle" had a broad meaning (i don't think you would know that since you didn't seem to know that Moses wasn't in the book of Genesis).
Now that's an ad hom....

Another ad hom. *sigh* see if you can follow this...

All spheres are circles, but not all circles are spheres. Your logic falls flat.... as a circle.

But..since you're an atheist you're probably forcing yourself right now to think slower and comprehend less so that you can still justify your meaningless life.
So at this point you really have nothing to go on, hmm?


#4.) The Egyptians wern't astronomers; they were astrologers, there is a difference.
Not as much as you'd think. The Egyptians kept meticulous records of the stars in order to schedule their religious rituals. Astrology, perhaps, but the point is that the Egyptians had been studying the sky long enough to learn quite a bit.

Moses knew about the true God and creator and eventually led the Hebrew nation out of Egypt.
Non-sequitor.

These Israelites were not into Egyptian myths, but they knew everything the Egyptians knew and more about origins.
And you say this because you choose to believe the Hebrew myths over the Egyptians. your prerogative, of course, but that doesn't make it "evidence" for anything.

I guess you can count-out the evolution alien theory out know You just proved aliens are not responsible for life on earth. Thats will hurt evolutions last resort tactics (hahahaha!!!).
too idiotic to merit a response-- ah, crud, I just gave one.


Im right, you're wrong
And thats the memo
Most mature thing you've said this whole post...
 
Upvote 0