• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

razeontherock

Well-Known Member
May 24, 2010
26,546
1,480
WI
✟35,597.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
I've only encountered unbelievers who cite reading the Bible as the reason for the unbelief here on CF, and in every instance it's due to them having WAY wrong ideas about what is said.

I'd love to see your reasoning, but let me guess:

the OT shows horrendous Judgments, and actions. So you think this means that's who God is?


It never occurred to you there's such a thing as an anti-type? A negative example?

The Bible is full of them, and it has only 1 hero. HINT: who did Joshua meet when he had his major turn-around, before he started winning?
 
Upvote 0

Upisoft

CEO of a waterfal
Feb 11, 2006
4,885
131
Orbiting the Sun
✟28,277.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
I'd love to see your reasoning, but let me guess:

the OT shows horrendous Judgments, and actions. So you think this means that's who God is?
I'm sorry. I will not explain it, I have my reasons.

And also you are far off with your guess. It is not moral issue. My moral is not from the Bible, so if it was playing any role in my decision the reasoning wouldn't be based only on the Bible. And as I already said my decision was based only on the Bible itself.
 
Upvote 0

razeontherock

Well-Known Member
May 24, 2010
26,546
1,480
WI
✟35,597.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
I don't know what is this.

That's from your post #129, where you couldn't respond to a whole slew of VERY basic questions about the Bible. Didn't you just get done saying you've read it 3 times, and you're making decisions based on it? But you have no clue what it means. That would be, poor judgment. Prescribed correction: put down the OT for a while, and start w/ the basics. Like looking for the answers to the questions I asked you, as you read the NT through, beginning w/ John's Gospel.

If you want to emphasize OT before you comprehend the basics of the NT, that's not even a way to be a Jew. You'd go to Jewish sources for that. And I do think Christians should go to those if they want to understand the OT.
 
Upvote 0

oi_antz

Opposed to Untruth.
Apr 26, 2010
5,696
277
New Zealand
✟7,997.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Hi Upisoft, I'm sorry to hear that you've found something discontenting. Although I have no idea what it was because you haven't shared the verse with us, I guess it's totally up to you how you respond to the information God has given us, and if you feel that all the effort He has gone to was to deceive you then I agree you'd be best to not trust that spirit who is talking to you when you read. So I won't press on against your will, but to answer a question you raised a few times earlier, I came across the chapter where Paul speaks about the difference between the body of Adam and the body of Christ, and that when we are resurrected we will be transformed into the likeness of Christ (which is not the likeness of perishable man, but the likeness of Christ Himself).



All the best with your endeavors, I'm sure you'll find what you are looking for with persistence
 
Upvote 0

Upisoft

CEO of a waterfal
Feb 11, 2006
4,885
131
Orbiting the Sun
✟28,277.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
That's from your post #129
I said that my decision has nothing to do with anything discussed in this thread and also asked you to ask God if you don't understand my decision. Instead you started digging the past.

Then Jesus said, “Whoever has ears to hear, let them hear.”(Mark 4:9)
 
Upvote 0

Upisoft

CEO of a waterfal
Feb 11, 2006
4,885
131
Orbiting the Sun
✟28,277.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
All the best with your endeavors, I'm sure you'll find what you are looking for with persistence
Have faith.

What do you think? If a man owns a hundred sheep, and one of them wanders away, will he not leave the ninety-nine on the hills and go to look for the one that wandered off?(Matthew 18:12)
 
Upvote 0

Mcygee

Newbie
Nov 4, 2010
22
0
✟22,634.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married


Well it is easy to say you just don't know how the universe was created, and then dismiss any thoughts behind it's creation. But your just fooling yourself at this point. Coming up with an excuse not to agree with the sound facts I've placed in front of you.

Something is either created or it is random. That's universal. If something happens without the help of any intelligence, then obviously the entire outcome will be random. There is no sound argument against this that I've seen or can think of. How can something be half created? In order for any organization to happen, an intelligence of some sort must be involved. How could it not be?

From the arguments on this that you've given me, it leads me to believe you may not be willing to accept the existence of God. If you will argue against this basic concept, then I don't see how you are being open to the possibility of God. Is that not why you are here? If not, it makes me wonder what all this is about. Why bother with this whole thing if you will never accept strong evidence of God's existence. I'm not trying to be rude, but I'm just trying to show you how odd it is that you would reject this evidence with no sound argument against it.


I actually support the idea that you need to understand what you do not know. It is the basis of so many of the things I research. I try to identify what I do not know, and then research that area. Which is why I can agree that I do not know HOW the universe was create specifically. But my reasoning that something that is not created must be random has no holes that I can find. Set aside how the universe was created, and it still rings true that if nothing intelligent was involved then it was done randomly. Even the general scientific community agrees on this. They believe the first cell came about randomly. If something is not random, then some intelligent being had a hand in it. The scientific community may point out patterns, but those patterns still come about from randomness.

We exist, don't we? We are the winner. As we don't know the rules of the game we cannot suppose anything about our winning.

We don't know the exact number, but with random creation we know the odds are ridiculously low.





Well this example COULD be used if you preselect an exact sequence (or a couple exact sequences) out of some incredibly large number (far larger than 1 billion). If then your coin tosses exactly match that sequence, then yes you could say that there was a deity involved. Or at least that the chances of it happening randomly are so slim that the likelihood of help not being involved is almost impossible. Or that when you toss the coin through the whole process twice that the sequence was the exact same. Otherwise just like the other example you have a random outcome no matter what. There was a 100% chance you would get an outcome. Now hitting a preselected outcome, that's more of a comparison to what we are talking about.


The only problem for my logic here is if you postulate that this universe has 0% probability to exist. In this case I cannot toss a coin unlimited number of times.

I wouldn't say it is a 0% chance, just close to it. Just like there would be if you did what I explained above.


Unfortunately the most basic cells possible are no longer living.

No they are not, but scientists do know the minimum things required for a cell to live and divide. Which is an incredibly complex system. They are attempting to create the most basic cells possible right now. Which they might be able to do. However, it won't be by random methods as they say the first cell was. They will have to borrow things from already living organisms and place things together in a very specific way. They say they can create proteins randomly, which only scratches the surface considering that proteins must be first created with amino acids properly and then they have to be bent in a specific 3D shape to do what they were made to do. Which is part of what cells do to replicate themselves.

Self programming is possible. You'd never know what such a machine will be able to achieve.

I can agree with the possibility of self programming. But that still won't equate to life.


And I'm feeling we are turning this into Creation vs. science thread. I don't feel this is the right direction.

Well I believe what occurred up to the point of the first cell is incredibly important. Especially if your mind works based on logic. It supports the idea of God, and thus dismissing it would prove all this to be pointless if we cannot talk about the areas that provide strong evidence of God. But I cannot help if you ignore the logic I've provided.
 
Upvote 0

visionary

Your God is my God... Ruth said, so say I.
Site Supporter
Mar 25, 2004
56,978
8,072
✟542,711.44
Gender
Female
Faith
Messianic
Is there any reason to believe in Christian God? I mean, a positive constructive reason. Not something like "What you gonna lose?"
Yeah.. there is a real good reason, God who created heaven and earth, is going to do a redo and would like to save as much as He can before wiping out the old with fire. He is asking you to trust Him, get ready for His return to come and save those who are ready for a new world and universe that is made without sin, death, and destruction. Are you interested?
 
Upvote 0

Mcygee

Newbie
Nov 4, 2010
22
0
✟22,634.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
People die at all ages. Does that mean 1 year old baby death is end of a test?

[BIBLE]Romans 5:13 - "For until the law sin was in the world, but sin is not imputed when there is no law."[/BIBLE]

[BIBLE]2 Samuel 12:22-23 (David Speaking) -

"And he said, "While the child was alive, I fasted and wept; for I said, 'Who can tell whether the LORD will be gracious to me, that the child may live?'

"But now he is dead; why should I fast? Can I bring him back again? I shall go to him, but he shall not return to me."[/BIBLE]

Children are not held accountable for sin they do unknowingly.


Give me some links to the verses that say so, please. I'm still stuck in Genesis wondering why Cain is afraid of other people, when the text shows he is there with only his parents, as he already killed his brother.

Here are a few links and scriptures.

Will I Be Happy in Heaven ? - Christian Living
[BIBLE]

  • 1 Peter 1:3-5
    Praise be to the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ! In his great mercy he has given us new birth into a living hope through the resurrection of Jesus Christ from the dead, and into an inheritance that can never perish, spoil or fade—kept in heaven for you, who through faith are shielded by God's power until the coming of the salvation that is ready to be revealed in the last time. (NIV)
[/BIBLE]

[BIBLE]1 John 5:11-13


11 And this is the testimony: that God has given us eternal life, and this life is in His Son. 12 He who has the Son has life; he who does not have the Son of God does not have life. 13 These things I have written to you who believe in the name of the Son of God, that you may know that you have eternal life,a]" class="footnote">[a] and that you may continue to believe in the name of the Son of God.
[/BIBLE]




Yes many parts of the OT can be skimmed due to providing no real lesson, but instead an account of the families and tribes. God was so harsh with the Israelis because in order for him to dwell among them there could be no sin and all had to be clean. God cannot dwell with sin for he is perfect. There are others in the world who believed and worshiped God outside of the Israelis, but these rules were not placed on them from what I see in the OT. There was a specific reason for his demands with them.


Yet you accept this one that benefits the specific group who believe in it.

It is open to all. Your play on my words is dishonest in its meaning. It is not a religion that tells people they must listen to a group of people in order for that group to control them in war or to gain riches for themselves. Though some in the past have tried to use the bible for that. As history shows. But the words and teachings themselves would actually go against this. Not support it.
 
Upvote 0

oi_antz

Opposed to Untruth.
Apr 26, 2010
5,696
277
New Zealand
✟7,997.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Great advice, as I know from experience this is exactly what He will do. The question you have to ask yourself is are you a lost sheep or are you a goat, and only you and Jesus know the answer to that, for anyone else to make an assessment is called judgmental. Certainly though, considering the story of the prodigal son, God gives us the freedom we so require that we may come to truly appreciate what it means to be His son when we find out what it means to live without Him.

I hope you will continue to seek the Lord's blessings, all the best.
 
Upvote 0