• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Real time or evo time?

dad

Undefeated!
Site Supporter
Jan 17, 2005
44,905
1,259
✟25,524.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Upvote 0

dad

Undefeated!
Site Supporter
Jan 17, 2005
44,905
1,259
✟25,524.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
I can show that dad has to ignore all rules of evidence in order to deny that there is evidence for a same state past.
The rules of the present state do not apply and they are the only rules you go by! They are the tent that all so called evidence must reside in for you. How small minded and petty.
 
Upvote 0

dad

Undefeated!
Site Supporter
Jan 17, 2005
44,905
1,259
✟25,524.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Just answer the question.

Do we have to assume the suspect committed the crime in order to get a DNA match? Yes or no?
Anser the question, do you have some DNA from the time of creation and the flood etc? Yes or no? Obviously not. Do not pretend you have a suspect or evidence! Hoo ha
 
Upvote 0

dad

Undefeated!
Site Supporter
Jan 17, 2005
44,905
1,259
✟25,524.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Dad is master of the art of ad hoc hypotheses. ...
It is childish to call names. You can call thinking beyond the science knowledge puddle 'as hoc' all you like. Come on over to where oceans are deep ad fresh clean water abounds.
 
Upvote 0

ViaCrucis

Confessional Lutheran
Oct 2, 2011
39,606
29,175
Pacific Northwest
✟815,991.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Others
It is childish to call names. You can call thinking beyond the science knowledge puddle 'as hoc' all you like. Come on over to where oceans are deep ad fresh clean water abounds.

Ad hoc, not as hoc.

-CryptoLutheran
 
Upvote 0

Loudmouth

Contributor
Aug 26, 2003
51,417
6,143
Visit site
✟98,025.00
Faith
Agnostic
Anser the question, do you have some DNA from the time of creation and the flood etc? Yes or no? Obviously not. Do not pretend you have a suspect or evidence! Hoo ha

I asked first. Answer the question.


Do we have to assume the suspect committed the crime in order to get a DNA match? Yes or no?
 
Upvote 0

Loudmouth

Contributor
Aug 26, 2003
51,417
6,143
Visit site
✟98,025.00
Faith
Agnostic
It is childish to call names. You can call thinking beyond the science knowledge puddle 'as hoc' all you like. Come on over to where oceans are deep ad fresh clean water abounds.

You can't even describe what the word "evidence" means. There is nothing in your ocean.
 
Upvote 0

dad

Undefeated!
Site Supporter
Jan 17, 2005
44,905
1,259
✟25,524.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
I will buy Dad a dictionary for Christmas, so that he can look up the definition of the word "prophet."
Meanwhile let's see a demo pf prophesy from renowned men of science....

"
tephen Hawking is (yet again) a harbinger of bad things to come: During the BBC's yearly Reith Lectures, the physicist said the science and technology advances made by the human race would likely be its undoing. In response to a question about how the world would end, Hawking pointed to nuclear warfare, global warming, and genetically engineered viruses as examples of how man-made threats could bring about its demise.

"Although the chance of a disaster to planet Earth in a given year may be quite low, it adds up over time, and becomes a near certainty in the next thousand or ten thousand years," Hawking said, according to the BBC. "By that time we should have spread out into space, and to other stars, so a disaster on Earth would not mean the end of the human race."

http://www.fastcompany.com/3055651/fast-feed/stephen-hawking-foretells-the-end-of-the-world-again


Or here..

"What is the ultimate fate of our universe? A Big Crunch? A Big Freeze? A Big Rip? or a Big Bounce? Measurements made by WMAP or the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe favor a Big Freeze. But until a deeper understanding of dark energy is established, the other three still cannot be totally ignored."

http://www.universetoday.com/37105/fate-of-the-universe/


Hahaha pity the poor folks that believe any of this nonsense and false prophesy.
 
Upvote 0

dad

Undefeated!
Site Supporter
Jan 17, 2005
44,905
1,259
✟25,524.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
It is the rules of reason and evidence.
You have none. So any rules you make u are worthless.
When the facts match the hypothesis, then the hypothesis is accepted as true. That's how it works.
When modern hypotheses are all based on religion, what actually needs matching is fact and evidences. Show independent proof of dates (not involving supposed radioactive decay in the far past) for anything in the KT era?
 
Upvote 0

joshua 1 9

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
May 11, 2015
17,420
3,593
Northern Ohio
✟314,607.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
It's all just made up stuff.
So are you admitting that everything you say and everything you do on here is just "made up stuff"? Do you just kinda make it up as you go along?
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

lesliedellow

Member
Sep 20, 2010
9,654
2,582
United Kingdom
Visit site
✟119,577.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
So are you admiring that everything you say and everything you do on here is just "made up stuff"? Do you just kinda make it up as you go along?

Dreaming up ad hoc hypotheses, to explain away inconvenient facts, tends to be creationists' speciality. But, since they form part of no coherent theory, and there only function is to explain things away, those ad hoc hypotheses eventually end up contradicting one another.
 
Upvote 0

Loudmouth

Contributor
Aug 26, 2003
51,417
6,143
Visit site
✟98,025.00
Faith
Agnostic
Answer the question.


Do we have to assume the suspect committed the crime in order to get a DNA match? Yes or no?
 
Upvote 0