• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Real reason they won't certify the bishop elect of my diocese

Status
Not open for further replies.

john23237

Senior Member
Jan 30, 2005
732
147
76
virginia
✟277,046.00
Faith
Anglican
Politics
US-Democrat
Well, my problem is somewhat different. The expression " contol freeks" , for some reason, comes to mind. The TEC wishes to control who is the bishop of South Carolina, not withstanding the wishes of the people of that diocese. The Anglican Communion wishes to control TEC, not withstanding the fact that in the last several General Conventions, in vote after vote and resolution after resolution, the church in America has made it's position clear. Have we become so child like in our thinking that we honestly believe that if we force a another group into doing or saying something that they clearly do NOT believe in, we have won something? If the school yard bully twists a smaller child's arm until he cries "uncle", the bully has proven his point and is the "good guy"? The Anglican Communion is, IMHO, behaving like a school yard bully toward TEC and it, in turn, behaving so toward the diocese of South Carolina. What a fine bunch of Christians we have become!
 
  • Like
Reactions: ebia
Upvote 0

gtsecc

Aspirant
Sep 3, 2004
8,343
263
56
✟9,845.00
Faith
Anglican
Last fall, the Diocese of South Carolina elected as Bishop Fr. Mark Lawrence of Bakersfield, California. Fr. Lawrence was elected on the first ballot. The election of a Bishop requires the consent of a majority in the House of Bishops as well as the Standing Committees of all the Dioceses of the Episcopal Church. After a delay in the process, it appears Fr. Lawrence may not receive the consents of a majority of the Standing Committees by the March 9th deadline. The following is Father Sanderson’s commentary on the matter.

The Arrogant and Ignorant Rejection of Mark Lawrence

If you are a southerner as I am, you will know the indignation that we feel nearly every time that southern people are portrayed by the national media and “entertainment” industry. Stereotypes abound. Accents and phrases that have never been uttered by any human being since time began are foisted upon the unsuspecting. We are depicted as ignorant barefoot fools, slapping our children, each of whom is supposed to be infected with lice and pinworms. Amos and Andy could never have been more of a tortured caricature.

And so we do well to be indignant, because the picture painted of us is a lie. We are indignant because the people who manufacture such images are arrogant and ignorant, a most unattractive combination. And we are indignant because the perpetrator has formed his smug opinion, and nothing, least of all the truth, will change his rigid mind.

And so, it seems like the same-old story. Anglicanism in South Carolina dates to 1680. We have had a gracious and blessed heritage. Our leaders, both lay and clerical, have served this church with distinction for generations. They have shown themselves time and again to be reasonable, articulate, well-educated and faithful. The first four or five bishops of the diocese were known as Carolina Catholics, for while they were not ritualists, thy held a doctrine of the church that was both catholic and evangelical in the best Anglican sense of those words.

In the conflicts that have beset our Church since the General Convention willfully ignored the rest of the communion, we have set our course with very simple and well-stated parameters:

1) We are Biblical, Creedal, and Apostolic. The Scriptures have authority. The Scriptures are interpreted in light of Sacred Tradition. The Tradition has been received from the Apostolic Church. No Christian has the right to alter this deposit of Faith and still call himself a catholic Christian. When bishops, conventions or seminaries attempt to change the received doctrine, we will protest and resist.

2) We are both evangelical and catholic. Our Evangelical hearts require us never to cease in our quest to take the Gospel to all people. Our Catholic sense of order reminds us that the church is never merely the local community, but the whole people of God connected through a common Faith and the Apostolic Succession to Jesus himself. Therefore, we understand that “independent” Anglicanism is impossible. Our request for Alternative Primatial Oversight had nothing to do with schism. On the contrary, it was clear to us that the American Church, by its unilateral actions, had in fact created a de facto schism with the rest of the church. It was our very catholic ecclesiology that would not allow us to stand for such a breach in communion. But even as we registered our strong protest against American unilateralism, we never once took a single uncanonical action, nor have we threatened to do so.

This is what we have consistently said, and we have been called schismatic.

This is what our bishop-elect has consistently said, and he has enjoyed the same abuse.

South Carolina votes to leave the Episcopal Church, the newspapers declare. That is a lie.

Disloyal. Rebellious. Fanatical spouteth the Via Media and Episcopal Forum.

But that is but slander and hypocrisy.

Your bishop-elect will not take his oath of allegiance! complain the Standing Committees in spite of his own clear words to the contrary.

And in Tanzania, the unanimous communiqué signed by our own Presiding Bishop has validated and vindicated every single point we have tried to make.

So what could possibly cause a Standing Committee to vote no? Arrogance and ignorance. No two ways about it.

Mark Lawrence is one of the finest priests this church has produced. He is humble, scholarly, wise and spiritually mature. What a tragedy if he is denied the office to which God and South Carolina have so clearly called him.

All because some people would rather believe in their prejudices, than the truth so plainly available to them.

Arrogance. Ignorance. And Shame.



Dow Sanderson

Church of the Holy Communion,

Charleston, South Carolina
 
Upvote 0

gtsecc

Aspirant
Sep 3, 2004
8,343
263
56
✟9,845.00
Faith
Anglican
Upvote 0

gtsecc

Aspirant
Sep 3, 2004
8,343
263
56
✟9,845.00
Faith
Anglican
He was our speaker this weekend at a Conference.
I wish those voting no had been at the conference - it would have shamed them to the core of their being to play politics and games with this holy man.

Standing comities are voting no, because he is conservative, then when they are asked, they tell their laity he is a schismatic. I cannot believe people in the church are willing to be flat out dishonest like they are. I am extremely disappointed.
 
Upvote 0

gtsecc

Aspirant
Sep 3, 2004
8,343
263
56
✟9,845.00
Faith
Anglican
Virgin Islands says Yes; Georgia reconsiders and Changes to Yes; Consents at 54
As of Monday morning the Diocese of South Carolina Standing Committee received word that the Virgin Islands have said yes, and that the Diocese of Georgia Standing Committee reconvened and changed their earlier no to a yes. This puts total consents at 54.
(A few days ago the Diocese of Virginia joined East Tennessee and Kentucky in Reconsidering; Father Mark Lawrence Received their Consent;
Ohio, Eau Claire, Central Ecuador and Honduras voted "yes," as well.)

Two Items Follow:
A Letter From Mark Lawrence to Standing Committees;
An Update on Standing Committee Consents

Dear Standing Committees of The Episcopal Church,
I have been told that some diocesan Standing Committees have graciously offered to reconsider their denial of consent to my election as the XIV Bishop of South Carolina, if they only have assurance of my intention to remain in The Episcopal Church. Although I previously provided assurance of my intention, this has not been sufficient for some Standing Committees, which are earnestly seeking to make a godly discernment. Therefore, taking to heart the apostolic admonition in 1 Timothy 3:2, “Now a bishop must be above reproach, …temperate [free from rashness], sensible, dignified, hospitable, an apt teacher….” I am reminded to make every attempt to reason with those who have denied consent or who have not yet voted. As I stated at the walkabout in Charleston on September 9, 2006 and again in a statement written on 6 November 2006, I will make the vows of conformity as written in the BCP and the Constitution & Canons, (III.11.8). I will heartily make the vows conforming “…to the doctrine, discipline, and worship” of the Episcopal Church, as well as the trustworthiness of the Holy Scriptures. So to put it as clearly as I can, my intention is to remain in The Episcopal Church.
Yours in Christ,
The Very Reverend Mark J. Lawrence

An Update for Standing Committee Consents to the Episcopal Election in the Diocese of South Carolina
The Standing Committee wanted to give everyone an update on the consent process. We are thankful to the majority of Bishops with jurisdiction who have given consent for the consecration of our Bishop-elect the Very Rev. Mark Lawrence. We must also receive consent from fifty-six (56), of The Episcopal Church Standing Committees postmarked by March 12, 2007. Some votes have been cast in the negative by some dioceses, but these votes may be reconsidered and changed. It is only the votes recorded by the deadline that count canonically. We are encouraged that some Standing Committees have decided to meet and reconsider their vote, and are praying that others will consider similar action. We also stand ready to answer any and all questions posted to us in as direct and clear a manner as possible. We have received with gratitude the consents for the consecration of Fr. Mark Lawrence from the following fifty-two (52) Standing Committees:
Province I
Western Massachusetts
Province II
Albany
American Churches in Europe
Haiti
New Jersey
Virgin Islands
Province III
Northwestern Pennsylvania
Pennsylvania
Pittsburgh
Virginia
Province IV
Alabama
Atlanta
Central Florida
Central Gulf Coast
East Tennessee
Florida
Georgia
Kentucky
Louisiana
Mississippi
South Carolina
Southeast Florida
Southwest Florida
Tennessee
Upper South Carolina
West Tennessee
Province V
Eau Claire
Fond du Lac
Missouri
Northern Indiana
Ohio
Quincy
Southern Ohio
Springfield
Province VI
Colorado
Iowa
Minnesota
North Dakota
Province VII
Dallas
Fort Worth
Oklahoma
Rio Grande
Texas
West Texas
Western Louisiana
Province VIII
Alaska
Hawaii
San Diego
San Joaquin
Province IX
Central Ecuador
Dominican Republic
Honduras
Litoral (Equador)
Puerto Rico

We are grateful to Presiding Bishop Jefferts Schori and her fellow Primates for establishing the concept of the office of Primatial Vicar with its attendant oversight by the Primate’s Pastoral Council and that of the Presiding Bishop. We see this proposal as a way forward to give us all space as our Communion pursues the development of the Anglican Covenant.

--The Rev. J. Haden McCormick
President of the Standing Committee of the Diocese of South Carolina
 
Upvote 0

longhair75

Searching once more
Site Supporter
Jan 10, 2004
5,359
1,017
omaha
✟231,818.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Friend gtsecc,

The laity here is probably unaware of the need to communicate with the standing committee on this issue. Locally there has been no coverage of this vote. I thought I would make the call, but I have been unable to find the lists of who has voted yes or no. My last post in the thread discussing the vote change (March 8th) was asking for this so I could call if needed.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.