radiometric dating

[Loudmouth]

Yes such consistent information - like every ruin 1,000 years old buried - when it is claimed strata takes hundreds of thousands if not millions of years to form.

No one has ever claimed that EVERY layer of stratum requires hundreds of thousands of years to form. You are telling fibs again.

Again - the evidence does not fit what is claimed as fact in the slightest.

You are making stuff up. That is not evidence.

 

[dad]

True.

And suggesting that the laws of chemistry and physics have changed in the past is supported by what?

God.


Claiming that our nature existed is not supported by science or God.

 

[dad]

Those rather large problems are further compounded by hypocrisy. They will make arguments about evolution violating the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics, or how the laws of chemistry won't allow for abiogenesis. At the very same time, they will say that radiometric dating is wrong because we "assume" those very same laws. They require the most fundamental physical laws to change in order for radiometric dating to be wrong, and yet claim those very same laws are unchangeable when it comes to other topics.

It doesn't matter what present laws 'would' allow. Therein lies the deceit.

 

[Loudmouth]

God.


Claiming that our nature existed is not supported by science or God.

Once again, you turn a book into God.

 

[dad]

Once again, you turn a book into God.

Jesus turned a book into a living part of Himself. He said His words were living. They are from Him. He confirmed Scripture, and fulfilled it, and said it is IMPOSSIBLE to fail. Not a jot. Not a tittle. Now now, and also it will be there when the present world is no more. Sounds like we ought to pay attention. Come on over to the lovely side.

 

[Loudmouth]

Jesus turned a book into a living part of Himself. He said His words were living.

Once again, you can't separate what a book says from what a person says.

 

[Loudmouth]

It doesn't matter what present laws 'would' allow. Therein lies the deceit.

The deceit is when people ignore inconvenient evidenceby calling it "demonic delusions".

 

[dad]

The deceit is when people ignore inconvenient evidenceby calling it "demonic delusions".

How nice. Rather than peddling that silliness, find some facts. It has grown boring watching you pretend to be even loosely connected to evidence of your strange claimed past nature.

 

[dad]

Once again, you can't separate what a book says from what a person says.

That Person was God.

 

[Loudmouth]

That Person was God.

Evidence please.

 

[Loudmouth]

How nice. Rather than peddling that silliness, find some facts. It has grown boring watching you pretend to be even loosely connected to evidence of your strange claimed past nature.

Do you want me to reference the post where you called evidence "demonic delusions" and refused to address it?

 

[dad]

Evidence please.

This Christian site is evidence that Jesus is real and alive in people. The evidence of Scripture over the ages rings out clearly. You may not demean it, find something you are qualified to speak about.

 

[dad]

Do you want me to reference the post where you called evidence "demonic delusions" and refused to address it?

Yes. I want to see what you mistakenly thought was supposed to be evidence.

 

[Loudmouth]

Yes. I want to see what you mistakenly thought was supposed to be evidence.

Start reading this thread at post 353.

http://www.christianforums.com/threads/circular-reasoning.7878140/

I mentioned that vestigial features line with the proposed evolutionary histories, which is 100% true. Your only response is to say:

"Yes. Demonic delusion and denial. In reality there is no evidence of the sort you claim."--post 357

That is what you do when faced with evidence you can't explain. You call it names and run the other way.

 

[RickG]

.....find something you are qualified to speak about.

Oh please, please take your own advise.

 

[dad]

....

 

[dad]

I mentioned that vestigial features line with the proposed evolutionary histories, which is 100% true....

They line up with the truth also. For you to try to line it up with a delusion is not angelic is it?

 

[dad]

Oh please, please take your own advise.

I am qualified to speak of my Friend the creator. I am qualified to expose the basis of scientific claims regarding origins as bat dung.

You are not qualified to say Peter was a liar or wrong or etc, and you are not qualified to prove the claimed state nature science relies on.

 

[crjmurray]

I am qualified to speak of my Friend the creator. I am qualified to expose the basis of scientific claims regarding origins as bat dung.

You are not qualified to say Peter was a liar or wrong or etc, and you are not qualified to prove the claimed state nature science relies on.

Yes dad is the only true prophet of christianity.

 

[dad]

Yes dad is the only true prophet of christianity.

He called us friends. Deal with it.