- Jan 6, 2019
- 2,615
- 2,061
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Non-Denom
- Marital Status
- Single
Throwing in the towel, are we? I appreciate learning a new term (gish-gallop). Thanks.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
This thread is just a huge gish-gallop and can thus be summarily ignored.
There's no sense in debunking a copy and pasted link when the only reaction you get from the poster is another copy and pasted link.Throwing in the towel, are we?
I'm not even sure how it's possible to debunk the reality that biological sex is real, but then science denial can be pretty rampant in general on this forum.
Oh we like copy and pasted links then do we?
Transgender regret is a real thing. There's no diagnosis of predicting the future of a child's decisions later in life. To subject children to medical treatments with not knowing which child will and will not experience transgender regret subjects them to probable harm. Best let them wait to become an adult.Minor children are certainly a high priority as to what we need to discuss and what we will legally allow. Any gender dysphoria diagnosis (I believe) needs to be carefully considered with a specialist physician and separately a specialist child psychologist. I also believe a truly gender dysphoric child could benefit from early intervention.
No. That was literally saying we *don't* like link after link without description of the content and source. (And no, YouTube is not the source, the channel is.)
So many links to ignore...
With a bit of Googling you can find your own sources of information about some high-visibility lesbians and even more committed transexuals who have come to the same conclusion about radical transgender activism. Battle lines are being drawn.
Posting videos isn't discussion or debate. This is a "discussion and debate" board.
With a bit of Googling you can find your own sources of information about some high-visibility lesbians and even more committed transexuals who have come to the same conclusion about radical transgender activism. Battle lines are being drawn.
Except that you and a couple of others aren't even attempting to discuss or debate anything. Just responding with things like "no" or attempting to sidetrack the thread into something off-topic doesn't count as discussion OF the topic either.
It's not surprising. Whenever (actual) women speak out for our rights in some way, there are always those who will try various approaches in order to silence us from speaking or providing information. Now the current tactic is that "she's posting all wrong in a way I don't like" so needs to be shut down.
And for that matter, I have put in descriptions of what the videos were about, so the fact that they aren't the descriptions you demand or approve of seems to be your own issue. No one is forcing you to watch anything.
If the trans-radicals didn't use the approach of demanding their rights at the expense of women's rights, enjoying the fact that they are destroying rights of women, and all out waging war on women in general, perhaps there would be no need for threads like this one.
[MEGA SNIP]
When I saw this thread come up on the feed, I thought I might want to see the string of awfulness that it might trigger. I was not disappointed.
I responded on factual questions to see if I could sort out the problems of these "radicals" from what looked entangled in a general attack on transwomen and to keep the thread active in my notifications, since I don't follow this sub-forum. Even before posting, I wondered if it was a good idea. (It was not.)
And this is exactly why I no longer care what you have to say. Whatever discussion might be had about radical activists who do things that make women (intentionally) uncomfortable or attack them rhetorically is pointless since you apparently reject any notion that transwomen have any claim to that gender identity.
Descriptions are nice, and appreciated, but the sourcing is important. I see people and logos, none of which I recognize in most of the videos. (I did recognize the Reuters logo and the former president in that one video.) You give no compelling reasons for us to engage with the videos and they make poor responses to posts, generally.
You may have a point worth discussing, but so much of the comment and content you have provided is so wrapped in what seems like bigotry and the rejection of non-radicals that I see no reason to discuss it.
What's wrong with being a white nationalist? Do black nationalists who have taken similar stands on these type of issues make it acceptable, because if that is a standard then it's judging people by the color of their skin. It's a big flaw that sinks important issues where both sides may start leaving a discussion.Why do you stoop so low to post videos from white nationalists?
Your response seems to be built upon the content of the video. I will not watch it. I will not give any clicks to an alt-right media site in a video featuring the work of a <snip> nationalist.
This thread is just a huge gish-gallop and can thus be summarily ignored.
... which is the testimony of their experience. So, you don't dismiss their experience, only the testimony of their experiences. Wonderful.All I’ve seen linked is women’s opinions.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?