DaRev said:
Again, the term "semper virgo" or "ever virgin" do not appear in the original Smalcald Articles and thus is a straw man. You can stop quoting that now.
And again, many Lutheran scholars disagree with you.
This also was quite interesting By
Pastor Paul McCain (LC-MS)...
In the Lutheran blogosphere a bit of a storm has broken out over the question of whether or not the Blessed Virgin Mary remained ever virgin after giving birth to our Lord. This becomes such an emotional issue for a variety of reasons. The vast majority of Lutherans today, particularly laypersons, have never even heard of the belief, long held in the Christian church, and believed by Lutherans for many generations after the Reformation, that Mary remained a virgin after giving birth to our Lord. This belief is known by Latin shorthand as "semper virgo" or "always virgin." The Lutheran Confessions simply assume it to be true
. Martin Luther, Martin Chemnitz and virtually
all Lutherans in the 16th century and throughout the Age of Lutheran Orthodoxy believed it. The first president of The Lutheran Church--Missouri Synod, Dr. C.F.W. Walther firmly and passionately believed it, taught it, and confessed it.
It wasn't really until the 20th century came along that belief in the semper virgo, by Lutherans, began to be widely questioned and now, today, some take great offense at the idea that Mary remained every virgin, even regarding the semper virgo with open disdain and hostility. Could it be that heights of Marian idolatry that reachd its zenith in the 20th century caused many to shy away from the semper virgo?
So, fast forward to recent years. A renewed passion for the Lutheran Confessions among pastors in the Missouri Synod has caused many to take a second look at the Semper Virgo and wonder why it is that a belief taken for granted by the Lutheran Church in its Confessions and in its greatest theologians fell out of such favor, so rapidly in the 20th century.
Do the Lutheran Confessions in fact put forward the semper virgo as a clearly articulated doctrinal assertion? C.F.W. Walther thought they did. Francis Pieper, his heir and successor in the position of both chief dogmatician of the Synod, and also serving as president of The LCMS, took a bit more of a moderating position. His views on the issue of the semper virgo are set forth in his great dogmatics text "Christian Dogmatics."
Finally, I am reticent to dismiss the semper virgo quickly simply because of the fact that so many of my fathers in the faith did embrace it, even while at the very same time strenously, and clearly, rejecting the cult of Mary that infested Medieval Romanism. What the Lutheran Confessions regard as a "given" on an issue like this does give me reason not to reject the semper virgo , even while I do retain some reservations.
Q