• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
  • We hope the site problems here are now solved, however, if you still have any issues, please start a ticket in Contact Us

Questions on solipsism

Caoimhe

Not a regular member
Aug 3, 2008
179
12
✟22,869.00
Faith
Pantheist
Marital Status
Single
Can solipsism be communal in the sense that the self "allows" other entities in her imagined world to think freely and on their own? In this sense could it be said that a solipsist has an interdependent nature with her own imagination and thus could become lost, even losing the sense of her own existence if imagination were somehow stripped from her?

Somehow I think there could be a flaw in my reasoning, but at the same time I reckon it could generate some interesting feedbacks, discussions.
 
L

Legion.As.One

Guest
One who believes that all other minds and things around it are false, (and therefore maybe already "allowed" to think for themselves), cannot believe that the other imagined minds can actually make descisions. In a way, they control everything that goes on in their "imagination" but they also have no control, like in a dream.
And in my opinion, thats no way to live one's life.
 
Upvote 0

Avatar

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
May 26, 2004
549,102
56,600
Cape Breton
✟740,518.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Conservatives
Because the original question relies on a misunderstanding of solipsism, and because the following answers were all completely off base. So yes, says me.

Says you not. My post was in no way off base. Do you know what Pandeism is? It's the ultimate expression of solopsism.

However, if you wish to not participate in this thread, by all means don't let the door...
 
Upvote 0

Avatar

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
May 26, 2004
549,102
56,600
Cape Breton
✟740,518.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Conservatives
Yeah, I thought about it, and while I disagree with your analysis, I decided you didn't deserve any ridicule, so I changed the post. You didn't waste any time though, dang.

Whoah. Now that's not the usual post I'm used to at CF. I like you. :thumbsup:
 
Upvote 0

Caoimhe

Not a regular member
Aug 3, 2008
179
12
✟22,869.00
Faith
Pantheist
Marital Status
Single
*grins*

I see that many of you in my absence were engaged in the discussion of solipsism and any variation thereof. Good, good. Any criticism or feedback with a dose of intellectual intent can be good for the soul as well as for the mind.

Now, Pandeism is something I am NOT familiar with but thank you for introducing it to me, Avatar. So let me get this straight... Pandeism is the notion that all other minds are real and perceivably distinct from the self, "the originator", but at the same time they need the creator's permission to exist?

In the context of Pandeism then what happens if "the self" decides to forego the role of the creator for once by granting complete, unbounded freedom to the "other minds"? If the creator grants this kind of freedom, finds herself enjoying her interaction with these "other minds" and comes to rely on them as entities separate from herself, is she not jeopardizing herself? Is she not in danger of destroying the very idea of solipsism possibly through her lack of control? What if madness, for instance, controls everything which includes her way of thinking and the way she interacts with her other minds?

And one more thing... does solipsism say that the original mind has to have ownership or can it be just an abstract, floating thought in the universe?
 
Upvote 0