Hello
I am a Christian and I am from a conservative and mainstream church.
I am, an evolutionist, as well as an orthodox Christian. Unlike many professing Christians ( in Singapore at least) , I do not agree that evolution is ''anti-Bible''. In the following paragraphs, I will illustrate why faith in God does not compromise an acceptance of evolution, and why neither does evolution ''disproves'' God. I will address your questions one by one. Each paragraph for one question.
1) -Do you believe in God? If so, briefly explain your view.
Yes I believe in God. The personal God of the Bible. I believe in the Bible's inerrancy and after careful research, I am convinced that the Theory of Evolution does not conflict with the Bible. Superficially yes, there seem to be ''contradictions'', but under sustained reflection, these supposed ''contradictions'' fade away.
2)How do you think the universe began?
I do not know with absolute certainty ( indeed, its not the role of science to proclaim absolute truth). The Big Bang Theory is very plausible. The Big Bang Theory is the most well supported concept in scientific circles. There is a lot of evidence for it, for example, red shift, the background radiation in the universe, etc. Its not easy to elaborate here. Some may argue that the Big Bang theory disproves God, since the Big Bang has replaced God as the Cause of the universe. I disagree. There is a flaw in their reasoning, due to lack of philosophical inclination. The Big Bang is simply a key event in a process which resulted in the universe we see today. It is logically possible for God to use the Big Bang to create our universe. The Bible merely acknowledged God as the Creator. It does not include details on how the universe is created. The Bible only included details on who created it.
3)How do you think life originated?
I think life originated from complex amino acids formed in the primordial days of the Earth. These amino acids form the basic building blocks of the carbon-based lifeforms we see today. They gradually form simple organisms, like bacteria, which then gradually evolved to flora and fauna. I am using very layman language, because I need to convey some pretty difficult concepts and if I use ''chim'' words, I'm afraid that I am incapable of conveying these concepts.
4)-Explain how you think life forms evolved.
In living things there is genes, which are subject to mutations, some of which are good and bad. There are 3 main processes. Natural selection, sexual selection and genetic drift. Please Google to find out more. Once again, its hard to elaborate a massive topic like evolution on forums like this. I recommend you do research on evolution, before doubting evolution. The evidence for evolution is tremendous.
5)
The Earth is roughly 4.6 Billion years old, which is established by consensus from many different fields of science, which are all independent of each other. Radiometric dating places the age of the Earth at roughly that time. This is merely one of the ways science has established this consensus. Once again, I beg you to do an honest research. Try to avoid biased websites, such as Answersingenesis or New Atheist's websites. I recommend objective sources that are free of religious (or anti-religious) bias.
-Do you believe in life on other planets, aliens, and UFOs?
I do not believe nor disbelieve. It is a possibility that there are other sentient races out there. Likewise. it is also a possibility that they do not exist. I will not make a stand on this, as this question is irrelevant to the issue of the evolution-vs-creationism debate.
Is evolution still happening, and if so, what do you think will be the end result?
Logically yes. I do not know what is the end result. Likewise, the question of ''what the end result is'' is not a relevant question in the evolution-creationism debate. Whether we know what the end result is or not, does not prove nor disprove evolution. The evidence for evolution rests in archaeology, biology , and paleontology ( as well as numerous other fields such as biogeography and evolutionary biology).
Do you believe in life after death? Explain
Yes I do. As a Bible believing Christian, I believe that we have a spiritual side as well, that does not die. A materialist, would assert that there is nothing beyond the natural laws. However, a theist like me believes in an afterlife.
How do your beliefs in origins and evolution affect your sense of purpose for your own life?
They don't. Evolution, like all other fields of science, does not make any pronouncements on issues like morality, philosophy, purpose. Science does not even propose an answer. When people claim ''evolutionary mutations is random and thus evolution disproves God, because God gives people a purpose'', they are making a mistake. These people misunderstand scientific methodology and have poor philosophical reasoning. The word ''random'' in science means ''unpredictable'', not ''purposeless''. Something can be unpredictable in nature, but it can have a purpose. A child may see a computer as a grandly unpredictable machine, as the child may not understand how the computer functions, but the computer, in truth, has a purpose, which is to provide people with the internet, socialising, information gathering etc. As you can see, evolution may be unpredictable, but it can have purpose. Is it not highly possible that God used evolution as a process with the purpose of creating humanity at a certain point at evolution?
Thank you.
he
I am, an evolutionist, as well as an orthodox Christian. Unlike many professing Christians ( in Singapore at least) , I do not agree that evolution is ''anti-Bible''. In the following paragraphs, I will illustrate why faith in God does not compromise an acceptance of evolution, and why neither does evolution ''disproves'' God. I will address your questions one by one. Each paragraph for one question.
1) -Do you believe in God? If so, briefly explain your view.
Yes I believe in God. The personal God of the Bible. I believe in the Bible's inerrancy and after careful research, I am convinced that the Theory of Evolution does not conflict with the Bible. Superficially yes, there seem to be ''contradictions'', but under sustained reflection, these supposed ''contradictions'' fade away.
2)How do you think the universe began?
I do not know with absolute certainty ( indeed, its not the role of science to proclaim absolute truth). The Big Bang Theory is very plausible. The Big Bang Theory is the most well supported concept in scientific circles. There is a lot of evidence for it, for example, red shift, the background radiation in the universe, etc. Its not easy to elaborate here. Some may argue that the Big Bang theory disproves God, since the Big Bang has replaced God as the Cause of the universe. I disagree. There is a flaw in their reasoning, due to lack of philosophical inclination. The Big Bang is simply a key event in a process which resulted in the universe we see today. It is logically possible for God to use the Big Bang to create our universe. The Bible merely acknowledged God as the Creator. It does not include details on how the universe is created. The Bible only included details on who created it.
3)How do you think life originated?
I think life originated from complex amino acids formed in the primordial days of the Earth. These amino acids form the basic building blocks of the carbon-based lifeforms we see today. They gradually form simple organisms, like bacteria, which then gradually evolved to flora and fauna. I am using very layman language, because I need to convey some pretty difficult concepts and if I use ''chim'' words, I'm afraid that I am incapable of conveying these concepts.
4)-Explain how you think life forms evolved.
In living things there is genes, which are subject to mutations, some of which are good and bad. There are 3 main processes. Natural selection, sexual selection and genetic drift. Please Google to find out more. Once again, its hard to elaborate a massive topic like evolution on forums like this. I recommend you do research on evolution, before doubting evolution. The evidence for evolution is tremendous.
5)
The Earth is roughly 4.6 Billion years old, which is established by consensus from many different fields of science, which are all independent of each other. Radiometric dating places the age of the Earth at roughly that time. This is merely one of the ways science has established this consensus. Once again, I beg you to do an honest research. Try to avoid biased websites, such as Answersingenesis or New Atheist's websites. I recommend objective sources that are free of religious (or anti-religious) bias.
-Do you believe in life on other planets, aliens, and UFOs?
I do not believe nor disbelieve. It is a possibility that there are other sentient races out there. Likewise. it is also a possibility that they do not exist. I will not make a stand on this, as this question is irrelevant to the issue of the evolution-vs-creationism debate.
Is evolution still happening, and if so, what do you think will be the end result?
Logically yes. I do not know what is the end result. Likewise, the question of ''what the end result is'' is not a relevant question in the evolution-creationism debate. Whether we know what the end result is or not, does not prove nor disprove evolution. The evidence for evolution rests in archaeology, biology , and paleontology ( as well as numerous other fields such as biogeography and evolutionary biology).
Do you believe in life after death? Explain
Yes I do. As a Bible believing Christian, I believe that we have a spiritual side as well, that does not die. A materialist, would assert that there is nothing beyond the natural laws. However, a theist like me believes in an afterlife.
How do your beliefs in origins and evolution affect your sense of purpose for your own life?
They don't. Evolution, like all other fields of science, does not make any pronouncements on issues like morality, philosophy, purpose. Science does not even propose an answer. When people claim ''evolutionary mutations is random and thus evolution disproves God, because God gives people a purpose'', they are making a mistake. These people misunderstand scientific methodology and have poor philosophical reasoning. The word ''random'' in science means ''unpredictable'', not ''purposeless''. Something can be unpredictable in nature, but it can have a purpose. A child may see a computer as a grandly unpredictable machine, as the child may not understand how the computer functions, but the computer, in truth, has a purpose, which is to provide people with the internet, socialising, information gathering etc. As you can see, evolution may be unpredictable, but it can have purpose. Is it not highly possible that God used evolution as a process with the purpose of creating humanity at a certain point at evolution?
Thank you.
he
Upvote
0


