- Aug 4, 2013
- 5,051
- 2,534
- 76
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Eastern Orthodox
- Marital Status
- Married
Those who accept US are trying to define what God's love is. Instead of accepting the counsel of Scriptures, you try to determine God's motive and behavior according to the limited knowledge of mankind.
Pro_3:5 Trust in the LORD with all thine heart; and lean not unto thine own understanding.
The Scriptures are very interesting regarding the universal scope of God's love and redemption:
But to the pro side of the argument and the title of today’s writing. I encountered an interesting little piece on the Internet in which the writer posted the following question as a heading: Did Jesus Die for All?
God will have all to be saved (1Ti 2:4) Can His will be thwarted? A most legitimate question. The usual answer is “But man has free-will!” Really? So the will of man trumps the will of God? Do you realize what you just said? That means that if puny, weak, nothing man can trump God’s will and be victorious, then you have no guarantee that Satan won’t do the same thing and throw God off His throne, as He wishes to do. You better think about that some more. While you are thinking, consider this regarding God and man’s free will.
God desires all to come to the knowledge of the truth (1Ti 2:4) Will His desire come to pass, or is it just a weak wish? Same as above. Is God all-powerful or not?
Jesus came to save all. (John 12:47) Will He succeed or fail? Excellent question. I can’t begin to tell you how many people will say that the majority of all mankind will wind up eternally separated from God in torment, and in the same breath, declare this to be a wonderful victory for God. That’s like declaring war on an enemy, having him destroy three-quarters of your town and take the people hostage, and then going around saying you won the war. Nonsense! (My real feelings are stronger than this, but I want to keep this family friendly.) And to the point of this blog piece – does all mean all or not?
In Adam all are condemned, in Christ all live (Romans 5: 15-21) Again, does all mean all? One of the most wretched dances I’ve ever witnessed to deny this verse comes from Calvinists who try to say that “all” means “all of the elect.” Calvinism is a ……………never mind. Again, I want to keep it family friendly. Let’s just say that Calvinism insults the character of God.
In Adam all die, in Christ, all live. (1 Corinthians 15:22) One of the strongest verses I’ve seen to declare that God leaves none of His children behind to be devoured by the evil one, even the most wicked and worst of His kids is included. (Yes, Virginia, even Adolf Hitler!) Remember, Saul of Tarsus [i.e. St. Paul] was a murderer just like Hitler. The only difference is in quantity, not quality. God saved Saul, God is not so weak that He can’t eventually save Schicklgruber.
All are reconciled unto God (Col 1:20). Does all really mean all, or only all of a certain class?
God will have mercy on all (Romans 11:32) All?
Jesus died for all (2 Corinthians 5:14-15). There’s that word all again! Did He die in vain? How can you possibly see the Cross as a victory if all do not eventually make it Home?
Honestly, there are another forty verses listed by this site, all of them stating the simple question: does all really mean all? As I study, I have to come to a couple of conclusions:
First conclusion: It is no wonder that the Early Church developed a strong universalist eschatology. They simply believed that which Christ taught. This was the really Good News, that death would not be victor. It is that which we joyfully chant in our Paschal Liturgy of St. John Chrysostom, “by death He conquered death.” This was the message of the first century. It was not “Have you accepted Jaaaaaayzuz as your personal Lord and Savior” It was the message that Paul spoke on Mars Hill to the Athenian philosophers, a message to strange to them that many of them said, “We will hear thee again of this matter.” (Acts 17:32)
Yes, Scripture says that ALL - ALL - will experience God's mercy. Therefore, it appears we are stuck in a conundrum - Scripture contradicts Scripture, and as I was taught as a young Evangelical, if you think this is the case, then one of the opinions is wrong and needs to be reworked.
And since it US is consistent with God is love, then I would say that you have some serious misunderstandings of both Christian history and exegesis. For instance, in terms of exegesis, the word "aionios" which has been quite discussed here, then is more easily understood to be "age-lasting" rather than "eternal" because it doesn't create a conflict with the verses that state that God will have mercy upon all.
As for Christian history: Weaponizing God
Yes, nothing as fine as a fierce and hateful God to keep the unwashed, unlearned, and rebellious masses in line, eh? Especially if you claim to be His right-hand man (pope) and want to keep people in line and from jumping ship to some other religion over which you have no control!
Upvote
0