I don't know. How effective was he? If he was less effective then the bible is at testifying against evolution does that change the definition of "effective" somehow?
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I don't know. How effective was he? If he was less effective then the bible is at testifying against evolution does that change the definition of "effective" somehow?How effective was Jesus at testifying of His messiahship?
Notice I'm not responding to you?Slightly less effective than Mohammed was at testifying of his ability to hear the words of Allah.
At least they have dots to connect.I think it's harder to get away with playing connect-the-dots.
What of all the Christians that do not think the bible testifies against the theory of evolution?My pastor thinks, as do I, that schools don't like the Bible because It is so effective in testifying against evolution.
What about them?What of all the Christians that do not think the bible testifies against the theory of evolution?
What about them?
If there were no Christians on earth, the Bible would still be eschewed in the schools for Its anti-evolution stance.
Except for all the Christian schools that teach evolution...If there were no Christians on earth, the Bible would still be eschewed in the schools for Its anti-evolution stance.
Ya ... and Madalyn O'hair was seen at a rest stop in Michigan, wasn't she?I find that doubtful since it is not currently eschewed in schools.
That'd be a little hard to do w/o Christians, dontcha think?Except for all the Christian schools that teach evolution...
Yes, I phrased that poorly. I meant that the Bible certainly isn't being eschewed in Christian schools that teach evolution.That'd be a little hard to do w/o Christians, dontcha think?
As long as It can be bent to fit the curriculum, I suppose so.Yes, I phrased that poorly. I meant that the Bible certainly isn't being eschewed in Christian schools that teach evolution.
It doesn't need to be bent at all. Theistic evolution is pretty simple. Christianity and science are perfectly compatible.As long as It can be bent to fit the curriculum, I suppose so.
Is that why you're a UU?Christianity and science are perfectly compatible.
I see no problem with it being the subject of a comparative religions class. It's not a science book, after all.What about them?
If there were no Christians on earth, the Bible would still be eschewed in the schools for Its anti-evolution stance.
O'hair evidently did.I see no problem with it being the subject of a comparative religions class.
Beats me.She had problem with it being the subject of a comparative religions class?
lol. You keep us in the lulz, as my children would say.Beats me.
It would seem that you are equivocating the eschewing of the Bible with that of religion.Somewhere along the line, schools began eschewing the Bible.
Oh ... I think I can come up with a difference between the Bible and religion.It would seem that you are equivocating the eschewing of the Bible with that of religion.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?