Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
"Practice" isn't a bad word. It just means to do something.
I really have no idea how this is "cruel" or what this has to do with one's "capacity to love".
[/color][/size][/font]
Apostacy is always the accusation of choice by those who utterly fail in argument. It is the badge of honor of those to whom it is applied. Orthodoxy is never a desirable nor obtainable state.
[/color][/size][/font]
Not at all. "Love" in relationships at all is new concept from the Enlightenment. "Courtly Love" of the Medevial times was a practice of playacting between noblewomen and their husband's staffers which were only consummated in rare cases like Guinevere and Lancelot. The lives of most of humanity was always prior to modern times in Hobbes' phrase "nasty, brutish, and short". People back then had no concept of love so much as of power.
Not at all. You put your trust in men in whom it is not well-founded. All scripture always has been written for mercenary motives. "God" was not involved. God supercedes authority of mortals all the time.
Does it?This topic probably deserves it's own thread Jamie.
Does it?
The topic was about why homosexuals don't feel loved by christians or why homosexuals don't feel loved or accepted by chrisitans.
You made an appeal to religious beliefs and tradition. I countered with why an appeal to tradition (especially those based on religion) isn't valid in my eyes.
As a homosexual, I see a lot of hate and apathy towards us from christians. This fact remains and you've really only reinforced it with your statements.
Agreement with God is always desirable to those who call Him Abba Father.
IAmRedeemed said:Agreement with God is always desirableto those who call Him Abba Father
Abba Father, or 'daddy'. Sounds so sweet.
Is He the same 'daddy' that has destroyed thousands of His creations out of anger?
Is He the same 'daddy' that has arranged a 'concentration camp' for His creations who disobey Him?
Just wondering.
Abba Father, or 'daddy'. Sounds so sweet.
Is He the same 'daddy' that has destroyed thousands of His creations out of anger?
Is He the same 'daddy' that has arranged a 'concentration camp' for His creations who disobey Him?
God is love, but He is also a God of justice
No. He is not their father. The Bible says that they're children of wrath, not children of God.
It's interesting how fundamentalists often tend to unintentionally imply that justice is something evil by placing it in opposition to love...
Given this statement, you should really examine yourself and how you view God, what do you think of him, do you love him? Do you put yourself above him? Often I hear this statement, it comes from people who don't really care at all about God. It's a personal relationship, don't spit on God claiming "Your Christians made me do this!!"Unbelievable!
This brand of 'Christianity' is beginning to make atheism look sweeter with each passing day.
Unbelievable!
This brand of 'Christianity' is beginning to make atheism look sweeter with each passing day.
When people say God is love, but also is justice, they are not explained as opposites, but both traits of his ultimate "goodness", holiness. I imagine seeing God in all of his goodness, greatness, and holiness, and why would anyone want to ruin it?It's interesting how fundamentalists often tend to unintentionally imply that justice is something evil by placing it in opposition to love...
This is semantic horse doody... you are clearly a person of religion whether you choose to admit that or not. You clearly follow a doctrine laid down for you by interpretation of the bible. You believe and worship and I think that is a fairly common definition of the religion, religiosity. Would you prefer I used 'belief system' instead? The point is... many of your beliefs, are based on things that have little supporting evidence...But your post was worthy of its own thread as it
is a conversation within itself. It's up to you what you decide. I offered the suggestion in good will.
As far as "religious" beliefs. I don't believe in "religions" or "religiosity",
so I am pretty sure I never offered any "religious beliefs and tradition".
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?