• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

question on Paul's letters...

Status
Not open for further replies.

OnederWoman

Charismatic Calvinist
Sep 24, 2003
229
2
52
NW AR
Visit site
✟370.00
Faith
Non-Denom
OK... another board I have a Jewish/agnostic guy asking me the following... I have no idea what to tell him... so, if anyone is willing and has a comment... please feel free... THANKS :)
------------------------------------------------------------------
quote:

Hopefully someone can clear some things up for me, since this is a spinoff of the baptism of the dead thread.

Someone else brought up, and most bible commentaries I saw on 1 corinthians 15:29 (mormon support for the baptism of the dead) wasn't an introduction to the idea of baptizing the dead. Paul didn't say, here's a new idea, for the people that are dead baptize by following this procedure. But rather he was saying that hey you guys are practicing this and it goes against the belief that Jesus was actually resurrected. But my question is if Paul didn't introduce baptism for the dead, who did?

On a different note I found several passages 2 Corinthians 11:4-9 and 1 Galatians 1:6-12 where Paul warns the church followers not to follow other gospels and in Galatians he says he received his gospel from Jesus himself which would say that Paul didn't know about the gospels (which would be the case if they were written 20 years later). But he was warning not to follow these other gospels, so who was teaching these gospels and what were they?

:end quote
 

A. believer

Contributor
Jun 27, 2003
6,196
216
64
✟29,960.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
OnederWoman said:
OK... another board I have a Jewish/agnostic guy asking me the following... I have no idea what to tell him... so, if anyone is willing and has a comment... please feel free... THANKS :)
------------------------------------------------------------------
quote:

Hopefully someone can clear some things up for me, since this is a spinoff of the baptism of the dead thread.

Someone else brought up, and most bible commentaries I saw on 1 corinthians 15:29 (mormon support for the baptism of the dead) wasn't an introduction to the idea of baptizing the dead. Paul didn't say, here's a new idea, for the people that are dead baptize by following this procedure. But rather he was saying that hey you guys are practicing this and it goes against the belief that Jesus was actually resurrected. But my question is if Paul didn't introduce baptism for the dead, who did?

On a different note I found several passages 2 Corinthians 11:4-9 and 1 Galatians 1:6-12 where Paul warns the church followers not to follow other gospels and in Galatians he says he received his gospel from Jesus himself which would say that Paul didn't know about the gospels (which would be the case if they were written 20 years later). But he was warning not to follow these other gospels, so who was teaching these gospels and what were they?

:end quote
I don't know who introduced the practice--in fact, I don't believe it's even clear exactly what Paul meant by baptizing for the dead, but Paul's argument is not that baptism for the dead goes against the resurrection. On the contrary, he's saying that people baptize for the dead because of the hope of the resurrection. He doesn't seem to be either condemning or condoning the practice in that statement. He's only making the point about the reality of the resurrection.

In Galatians, the other gospel that's specifically addressed in that epistle is the gospel of the Judaizers who were trying to compel Gentile believers to be circumcised. Since Christianity was still considered a sect of Judaism, the unconverted Jews allowed it to be practiced as long as the followers were circumcised, but they would persecute Christian teachers who taught Gentiles Christians not to be circumcised. The Judaizers, according to Paul, wanted to avoid persecution from the Jewish authorities, so they compromised the true gospel by telling the Galatian Christians to be circumcised. Circumcision, Paul argues, was the sign of the Old Covenant, and those who practiced it after the institution of the New Covenant were binding themselves to the Old Covenant law. Paul was telling them that the two couldn't be mixed, and if they were circumcised that Christ's atonement for sin profited them nothing.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.