- Jan 17, 2005
- 44,905
- 1,259
- Country
- Canada
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Private
Actually the failure to post support for science claims can't be waved away.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Actually the failure to post support for science claims can't be waved away.The only thing it confirms is you need stronger meds
Those who can't produce a solid science case for their science claims can do what they like. Who cares?
Actually the failure to post support for science claims can't be waved away.
Opinion of God's word noted.And those who know jack can quote scriptures? ok deal
We wait for the goods from you for your pasta state past of fake news science. It will be examined fairly.As opposed to the ability to make sh*t up as they go along?
Opinion of God's word noted.
We wait for the goods from you for your pasta state past of fake news science. It will be examined fairly.
That's nice.I didn't mention anything about God's word,...rather the people who think its God's word
You want God's word? sure...
hare kṛṣṇa hare kṛṣṇa
kṛṣṇa kṛṣṇa hare hare
hare rāma hare rāma
rāma rāma hare hare
Sorry didn't mean to get you excited.Did someone said pasta?
Touched by his noodly appendage-Leonardo So Itchy
OKGlad you like it
I'll let you get back to your research and presentation preparation supporting your same state pasta past fake news science claim. Good luck with that.Not a prob, was hungry anywayz
I'll let you get back to your research and presentation preparation supporting your same state pasta past fake news science claim. Good luck with that.
No problem. We will wait for your presentation of proof for the same state past nature. Till then.....Thats nice of you, and I'll let you get back to generating more crap,...good luck amigo!
No problem. We will wait for your presentation of proof for the same state past nature. Till then.....
Sorry ... I still don't get it.
And I'm being serious here.We call that a "judgment from God."Not to mention the population itself.There were four lines of "genetic diversity" after the Flood: Noah's, Shem's, Ham's, and Japheth's. Just how many are required?Not if God decrees otherwise. But let's say He didn't. Again, you have four lines of diversity getting off the Ark. How many do you need?Yes ... nature operates much more slowly than God in some areas. That's why nature had nothing to do with this.
I'll pass.Google "genetic bottleneck" and read or whatch a 3 minute video. It's not hard.
I'm not interested in hearing how a natural process ... without God in the picture at all ... is used to explain how God couldn't have orchestrated a miracle in the past.TagliatelliMonster said:But I doubt you care enough about being rational to go through that effort.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?