Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
International Politics
Question for those in favour of deporting illegal migrants
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="TG123" data-source="post: 58274669" data-attributes="member: 154099"><p>So a skinhead who shot up a synagogue in Jerusalem and returned to the US would not face punishment if the Israelis did not catch him...</p><p> </p><p>What about sex tourists? Under Canadian law, a pedophile who rapes a kid in Thailand is to be subjected to prosecution in Canada, even if the crime did not happen there. Sadly this law has not been enforced often enough.</p><p></p><p>Out of curiousity, if an American pedophile rapes a kid in Guatemala and escapes back to America, could he face prosecution in the US?</p><p></p><p></p><p>Just a few weeks ago, Mexico extradited a criminal who ran down and killed an American Border Patrol agent. He is now going to be spending the rest of his miserable existence where he belongs, in prison.</p><p></p><p>There is no honest Mexican government in charge, but the EZLN controls some parts of Chiapas and do have a sort of government... the US could extradite Clinton and Bush and the House Members who signed NAFTA into existence to the Zapatistas, I am sure they could be locked up in some prison, maybe they could even be interned along party lines so Democrats and Republicans wouldn't mingle and start fights. It has been done with several gangs and at times is effective.</p><p> </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p> Sorry, my bad. Here we go:</p><p></p><p>The Universal Declaration of Human Rights</p><p><strong>Article 23.</strong></p><p></p><p> </p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"> (1) Everyone has the right to work, to free choice of employment, to just and favourable conditions of work and to protection against unemployment.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"> (2) Everyone, without any discrimination, has the right to equal pay for equal work.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"> (3) Everyone who works has the right to just and favourable remuneration ensuring for himself and his family an existence worthy of human dignity, and supplemented, if necessary, by other means of social protection.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"> (4) Everyone has the right to form and to join trade unions for the protection of his interests.</li> </ul><p></p><p><strong>Article 24.</strong></p><p></p><p> </p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"> Everyone has the right to rest and leisure, including reasonable limitation of working hours and periodic holidays with pay.</li> </ul><p>Mexican workers in maquiladoras are usually not being paid enough to provide for their families, cannot join unions, and women are often discriminated against there. Maquiladoras are owned by both Canadian and American companies, though for the most part American. I am doing my part up North to make sure our CEOs who abuse human rights in developing countries and particularly in Mexico are prosecuted and made to respect their workers and the people living there. You take care of your corporate criminals. Also, forget about vacations in these places and keep in mind that many of their labourers work for more than 8 hours a day.</p><p></p><p></p><p><strong>Article 17.</strong></p><p></p><p> </p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"> (1) Everyone has the right to own property alone as well as in association with others.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"> (2) No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his property.</li> </ul><p></p><p>When NAFTA was passed, millions of Mexican farmers were forced off their land. American and Canadian corporations also in other countries (Guatelama, Honduras, Colombia, etc) have had indigenous people thrown out of their homes who refused to allow them to use their land for mining.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p>Sorry, I misunderstood. Put George and Bill on a plane and send them to a Zapatista government in the Chiapas. They will know what to do with them.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="TG123, post: 58274669, member: 154099"] So a skinhead who shot up a synagogue in Jerusalem and returned to the US would not face punishment if the Israelis did not catch him... What about sex tourists? Under Canadian law, a pedophile who rapes a kid in Thailand is to be subjected to prosecution in Canada, even if the crime did not happen there. Sadly this law has not been enforced often enough. Out of curiousity, if an American pedophile rapes a kid in Guatemala and escapes back to America, could he face prosecution in the US? Just a few weeks ago, Mexico extradited a criminal who ran down and killed an American Border Patrol agent. He is now going to be spending the rest of his miserable existence where he belongs, in prison. There is no honest Mexican government in charge, but the EZLN controls some parts of Chiapas and do have a sort of government... the US could extradite Clinton and Bush and the House Members who signed NAFTA into existence to the Zapatistas, I am sure they could be locked up in some prison, maybe they could even be interned along party lines so Democrats and Republicans wouldn't mingle and start fights. It has been done with several gangs and at times is effective. Sorry, my bad. Here we go: The Universal Declaration of Human Rights [B]Article 23.[/B] [LIST] [*] (1) Everyone has the right to work, to free choice of employment, to just and favourable conditions of work and to protection against unemployment. [*] (2) Everyone, without any discrimination, has the right to equal pay for equal work. [*] (3) Everyone who works has the right to just and favourable remuneration ensuring for himself and his family an existence worthy of human dignity, and supplemented, if necessary, by other means of social protection. [*] (4) Everyone has the right to form and to join trade unions for the protection of his interests. [/LIST] [B]Article 24.[/B] [LIST] [*] Everyone has the right to rest and leisure, including reasonable limitation of working hours and periodic holidays with pay. [/LIST] Mexican workers in maquiladoras are usually not being paid enough to provide for their families, cannot join unions, and women are often discriminated against there. Maquiladoras are owned by both Canadian and American companies, though for the most part American. I am doing my part up North to make sure our CEOs who abuse human rights in developing countries and particularly in Mexico are prosecuted and made to respect their workers and the people living there. You take care of your corporate criminals. Also, forget about vacations in these places and keep in mind that many of their labourers work for more than 8 hours a day. [B]Article 17.[/B] [LIST] [*] (1) Everyone has the right to own property alone as well as in association with others. [*] (2) No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his property. [/LIST] When NAFTA was passed, millions of Mexican farmers were forced off their land. American and Canadian corporations also in other countries (Guatelama, Honduras, Colombia, etc) have had indigenous people thrown out of their homes who refused to allow them to use their land for mining. Sorry, I misunderstood. Put George and Bill on a plane and send them to a Zapatista government in the Chiapas. They will know what to do with them. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
International Politics
Question for those in favour of deporting illegal migrants
Top
Bottom