HitchSlap
PROUDLY PRIMATE
... real sensus divinatis.
Sorry, religious types don't have a corner on the market for a well understood human experience. To be inspired by 'the wonder of it all,' is not evidence for your god. If you think it is, then you must accept the claim that all who are religious claim is true of their god/s.
This thread is a pretty good demonstration of how #team_atheism can quite easily claim that, as individual atheists, they personally don't find a certain fact claim or logical proposition persuasive.
I personally don't find your logical proposition persuasive.
(I deleted the "certain facts" bit, because you haven't provided any.
They can make a brute (special pleading) assertion that something doesn't meet their personal definition of "evidence".
We definitely have differing opinions on what constitutes evidence.
They can merely assert that something ISNT finely tuned,
Are you familiar with the 'anthropic principle?'
that something HAS always existed,
Maybe. Maybe not.
that maximal greatness is in the eye of the beholder,
Not sure what you're trying to convey here.
that morality isn't connected to divinity...etc.
Correct. It's connected to social contracts and cultural mores.
But what they can't do, and haven't done in this thread, or anywhere else, is provide a solid, substantial counter-explanation (rebuttal) of God
Sure I have. Maybe you weren't paying attention.
which is sufficiently persuasive to outweigh the true witness of the Holy Spirit, the sensus divinatis, and real, lived experience of supernatural events that theists have unanimously corroborated for thousands of years.
Richard Feynman said it best,
“The first principle is that you must not fool yourself — and you are the easiest person to fool.”
Upvote
0