• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Question about Adultery

Grishnak

Well-Known Member
Mar 21, 2005
609
30
✟904.00
Faith
Christian
Somethins amiss here SK, sorry

You have admitted to Pauls concession about letting the unbeliever leave, yet Jesus Himself said ''except for fornication''.

If Jesus NEVER went back on his own words, then Paul is a liar and deciever as he has permitted the unbeliever to leave and says the beleiver is not bound in that case.

If Paul was who he said he was, then his words inspired by the God do indeed show that Jesus went back on something He said (EXCEPT for fornication) when Paul was directed to permit the believer to let the unbeleiver leave.


Now see, MY understanding says that Jesus WAS right when He said what He said.
He was dealing with Pharisees trying to trap Him in His words, and set them straight that they werent to toss out a wife for anything short of harlotry since they had been casting them out ''for any cause''.

Paul made his new concession based on MERCY.
He obviously was watching unbelieving spouses just up and walk out on thier NEWLY born again spouses, leaving them without a companion thru no fault of their own.

Like it or not chum, Pauls concession was made out of the one thing you dont seem to like...Mercy for the innocent believer.
 
Upvote 0

SirKenin

Contributor
Jun 26, 2003
6,518
526
from the deepest inner mind to the outer limits
✟9,370.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
No, Paul didn't lie. Don't you listen to a darn thing I say Grish? Are you so hell bent on proving you're the ultimate authority and saving your own hide that you miss three quarters of the post?

Paul was saying that you can not hold the unbeliever in your marriage accountable to Jesus' teachings on divorce. The reason for this is simple. To a non-believer, as we have seen in here all too often, Jesus' teachings are nothing but fantasies. They don't guide themselves according to Jesus' commandments, they live the way they darn well please. So what Paul was saying is "don't try to hold the unbeliever accountable to Jesus' commandments. If they're hell bent to leave, let them do so. Jesus didn't want you to fight about it or try and force them to believe in Jesus and his teachings. He wanted you to live in peace".

Paul wasn't adding to Jesus' teachings at all. He wasn't even contradicting Jesus' teachings. Not even close. He was admitting that the nonbeliever was not held accountable to Jesus' teachings, but would be held accountable when he stood before God on that final day.

The very nature of Paul's and Jesus' teachings do not lend provision to abuse, flirting, boozing, punching the walls, denying you kids, throwing pots and pans, smashing up the car, spilling their beer on the ground, being slobs, or any other nonsense. In all other cases you are required to make the marriage work or stay single. There are no other options given by any New Testament book. If you do otherwise you WILL be held accountable when you stand in front of God. How He will treat it I have no idea, but I stand firm in my beliefs because I have researched them thoroughly which should be rather obvious. Like I said, I use Strong's Concordance, Thayer's Lexicon, Stephen's Textus Receptus, Matthew Henry's, Ray Steadman's, Chuck Smith's and David Guzik's commentaries, Naves Dictionary, Torrey's Dictionary, Easton Dictionary, the NIV and KJV and numerous websites. Then I have my father to boot. I trust them long before I trust you.
 
Upvote 0

Grishnak

Well-Known Member
Mar 21, 2005
609
30
✟904.00
Faith
Christian
Holy Cow-Monkeys, I think Im gonna swallow my tongue here.

So Paul went a step FURTHER than Jesus had?
WOW !!

Paul shows that what? "You can't hold a non-believer accountable to Jesus' teachings"

YAY

We're finally getting somewhere

So Jesus only permitted ONE item for divorce, then Paul, realizing that, hey, you cant MAKE an unbelieving spouse behave themselves, so why should the BELIEVER have to pay for the UNbelievers behavior the rest of their lives
 
Upvote 0

Grishnak

Well-Known Member
Mar 21, 2005
609
30
✟904.00
Faith
Christian
And there were no other options when Jesus said what He said, EXCEPT FOR FORNICATION!

And yet there is Paul, allowing for some mercy where Jesus had not.

I love that you tossed in the flirting one.

And I love how you seem to equate the beating of a wife (abuse) with "spilling their bear"
 
Upvote 0

babyangel

Active Member
Mar 8, 2005
82
3
✟217.00
Faith
Christian
SirKenin said:
Fornication does not include physical abuse

I never said fornication includes physical abuse. All I said was that coming from a person that was not a Christian and reading different versions of different bibles can be confusing. If it is fornication use the word fornication. In lay mans terms marital unfaithfulness could be misinterperted because of lack of biblical knowledge I was just making that point nothing more.
 
Upvote 0

SirKenin

Contributor
Jun 26, 2003
6,518
526
from the deepest inner mind to the outer limits
✟9,370.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
To the advice itself, which is that if an unbelieving husband or wife were pleased to dwell with a Christian relative, the other should not separate. The husband should not put away an unbelieving wife, nor the wife leave an unbelieving husband, v. 12, 13. The Christian calling did not dissolve the marriage covenant, but bind it the faster, by bringing it back to the original institution, limiting it to two persons, and binding them together for life. The believer is not by faith in Christ loosed from matrimonial bonds to an unbeliever, but is at once bound and made apt to be a better relative. But, though a believing wife or husband should not separate from an unbelieving mate, yet if the unbelieving relative desert the believer, and no means can reconcile to a cohabitation, in such a case a brother or sister is not in bondage (v. 15), not tied up to the unreasonable humour, and bound servilely to follow or cleave to the malicious deserter, or not bound to live unmarried after all proper means for reconciliation have been tried, at least of the deserter contract another marriage or be guilty of adultery, which was a very easy supposition, because a very common instance among the heathen inhabitants of Corinth. In such a case the deserted person must be free to marry again, and it is granted on all hands. And some think that such a malicious desertion is as much a dissolution of the marriage-covenant as death itself. For how is it possible that the two shall be one flesh when the one is maliciously bent to part from or put away the other? Indeed, the deserter seems still bound by the matrimonial contract; and therefore the apostle says (v. 11), If the woman depart from her husband upon the account of his infidelity, let her remain unmarried. But the deserted party seems to be left more at liberty (I mean supposing all the proper means have been used to reclaim the deserter, and other circumstances make it necessary) to marry another person. It does not seem reasonable that they should be still bound, when it is rendered impossible to perform conjugal duties or enjoy conjugal comforts, through the mere fault of their mate: in such a case marriage would be a state of servitude indeed. But, whatever liberty be indulged Christians in such a case as this, they are not allowed, for the mere infidelity of a husband or wife, to separate; but, if the unbeliever be willing, they should continue in the relation, and cohabit as those who are thus related. This is the apostle’s general direction.
 
Upvote 0

SirKenin

Contributor
Jun 26, 2003
6,518
526
from the deepest inner mind to the outer limits
✟9,370.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Grishnak said:
And what kind of peace is the beaten and repeatedly raped christian wife living in?

She can always leave and stay single because you can NOT show me a verse in the Bible that provides for her remarriage.
 
Upvote 0

seebs

God Made Me A Skeptic
Apr 9, 2002
31,917
1,530
20
Saint Paul, MN
Visit site
✟70,235.00
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican

Oh, dear.

See, now we get into the meat of things.

I was about to reply, but it was nearly time for church, so I took this with me to consider during worship.

I think you have some fairly important questions, but you have not asked the most important question. To save trouble, I will answer it.

God loves you, and will always love you, no matter how you resolve this.

If you screw this up, if you make a hash of things... God will still love you, and your sins will be forgiven.
If what you end up doing was not the right choice... God will still love you, and your sins will be forgiven.
If what you are called to do is beyond your strength, and you fall short... God will still love you, and your sins will be forgiven.

You will get a lot of advice. We love to discuss marriage and its implications, and there's a handful of passages with teachings on it, which not all churches understand the same way. You will get a lot of advice, and some of it will be conflicting advice. You may be told that you are not married, that you are married, that your marriage is valid, that it is invalid, that it never happened... People will say a lot of things. Not all of them will be true, although we will all mean well.

You will be on trial here, which is unfair to you and unproductive in resolving your problems. You will be accused of not really trying to do God's will... Which is funny, given that you're here asking for help understanding God's will.

Once again: If out of the tangle of answers you get, the one you trust is not true, your sins are still forgiven. God will not turn His back on you over an honest misunderstanding.

Do not let the fear of getting this wrong paralyze you.

But he cant be sorry for what he has done because he keeps doing it and can not undertand why I am upset.

That sounds like a serious problem, and like he may not be taking your concerns seriously.


You can do either of those things. I would ask whether you are sure reconcilliation is impossible. Is it possible that, while he does not currently understand, he could come to understand?

I assume he at least occasionally gave the impression of listening to you before you got married, or you wouldn't have married him. He can't be utterly without redeeming features.

Another likely question: Have you talked about counseling?


"Well the license says you had to stick around
until I was dead
Well if you're tired of looking at my face
I guess I already am"


It sounds to me like these are serious issues which would need some work to resolve, certainly. I think you should just tell him what you just told us.

"Right now, it feels like you don't respect me or care about me, you just want to get laid. I'd feel like an underpaid prostitute if I gave you meaningless sex to satisfy your urges when you're not even willing to listen to me or take the time to understand my feelings."

If he cares, he'll listen. If he can't accept that you have strong feelings, you will need external counseling to recover the marriage; if that's not an option, you're in a pretty bad place.

But remember: God still loves you, and will love you no matter what you do. It's okay. Things will work out somehow, and you will survive. Do not let people judge you or tell you otherwise.
 
Upvote 0

babyangel

Active Member
Mar 8, 2005
82
3
✟217.00
Faith
Christian

You are losing me, are you infact saying that if the unbeliever leaves the other spouse is free to marry. You did say that in a previous post, could you please reply to that direct question. Can you also tell me what makes a person an unbeliever, doesnt abusing someone and using drugs and being a bad person make a person and unbeliever, or worse then, what good is repenting when you keep doing it in his case. Please respond directly with a direct statement dont jump around my direct question.
 
Upvote 0

SirKenin

Contributor
Jun 26, 2003
6,518
526
from the deepest inner mind to the outer limits
✟9,370.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Grishnak said:
I trust a God who who had men sacrifice for centuries then turns around and says ''I desired mercy and not sacrifice" to a destitute and beaten wife over any man on earth

Yeah, that would be fine if you didn't take it out of context and actually applied it in the context within it was meant to be applied.
 
Upvote 0

SirKenin

Contributor
Jun 26, 2003
6,518
526
from the deepest inner mind to the outer limits
✟9,370.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
d. However, if the unbelieving spouse refuses to be married, then the marriage can be broken; but isn't to be initiated or sought by the believer

i. With faith and patience, they can look for God to work in their present circumstances, difficult as they may be

e. If the unbelieving spouse should depart, the Christian is not under bondage to the marriage; meaning they are in fact free to remarry

David Guzik
 
Upvote 0

Grishnak

Well-Known Member
Mar 21, 2005
609
30
✟904.00
Faith
Christian
See, I've studied an AWFUL LOT more than I originally let on and you pathetically accused me of.
...
 
Upvote 0

Grishnak

Well-Known Member
Mar 21, 2005
609
30
✟904.00
Faith
Christian
SirKenin said:
Yeah, that would be fine if you didn't take it out of context and actually applied it in the context within it was meant to be applied.
Context.

Jesus defending His disciples and David for breaking the law when they were hungry.

You say its not relevant, but David was under the Law and Jesus' did not tell those pharisee ''that was ancient history''...He defending their actions showing their need.
 
Upvote 0

SirKenin

Contributor
Jun 26, 2003
6,518
526
from the deepest inner mind to the outer limits
✟9,370.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married

You have no right to judge whether or not someone is a believer by their sins. Man knows the outside, but only God knows the heart. I can't know that. You can't know that. Nobody can know that but God, so really your question is impertinent and not worth spending any more time on.
 
Upvote 0

Grishnak

Well-Known Member
Mar 21, 2005
609
30
✟904.00
Faith
Christian

Is plagiarism a sin
 
Upvote 0

babyangel

Active Member
Mar 8, 2005
82
3
✟217.00
Faith
Christian

Trust me I have told him everything under the sun. And talked and talked and talked. He said he would not go to counceling and I have the problems, I need sex counceling (as stated earlier I cant have sex with someone I can not trust or respect for obvious reasons, sex was good before) I need to just get over it. Just like when I was depressed with postpartum depression and asked for help (ie stay home and keep me company) he was always out. His reponse was get over it or I will leave you. Also he has said if you go through bad menopause I will leave you. Were is the love and support and encouragement I need. I dont know how menoupause will hit me, but what if I need help and he just leaves me at that point or abuses me even more because I may have verbal outbursts. I cant trust this person. I am scared if I was paralized he would rape me against my will. I do not want to live life in fear. I also wanted to say we dated 6 years before marriage and we never fought, nothing to fight about. Then when we married I had to keep silent no opinion at all. I took it for 10 years and finally 5 years ago could not take anymore. Things were so so for 5years that is where I did my talking saying I am not happy get counceling, etc. He didnt take it seriously and kept going. Things just got worse and finally last year I asked him to leave. I thought it would be a wake up call yet he doesnt change. How long do I need to wait? Especially since he says he wants to divorce me.
 
Upvote 0

Grishnak

Well-Known Member
Mar 21, 2005
609
30
✟904.00
Faith
Christian
SirKenin said:
She can always leave and stay single because you can NOT show me a verse in the Bible that provides for her remarriage.
Sure I can.
She is divorced, unmarried, loosed from a spouse.

I say therefore to the unmarried and widows, It is good for them if they abide even as I.
But if they cannot contain, let them marry: for it is better to marry than to burn.
(1 Corinthians 7:8-9 KJV)

Whats funny, and Ive let this one slide, is you say Paul said ''let the unbeliever leave" and then pretend he said its ok to remarry after when actaully, he gives no such advice

So how do you conclude that one can remarry if the unbeliever leaves?
 
Upvote 0

SirKenin

Contributor
Jun 26, 2003
6,518
526
from the deepest inner mind to the outer limits
✟9,370.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married

He NEVER used that example to show that it was ok to break HIS commandments, so your argument is invalid.

Jesus also broke Deuteronomic Law, so he was not being hypocritical. The concept of mercy was directed at the Scribes and Pharisees.

Jesus never broke his commandments, so he was not being hypocritical.

Mercy was not a provision to use as an excuse to break Jesus' commandments at will. If that's the case why did Jesus waste his time giving them to us to begin with? Why did he follow them to the letter? Because you are expected to as well. He was setting an example that you are expected to follow. You will be judged on that final day based upon your adherence. God is not going to be sitting there going "Oh, you broke this law, this law and this law on purpose, in defiance of Jesus? Hmm. Well this is your lucky day. I've decided to let that slide today". Isn't going to happen. You will be judged according to your deeds and misdeeds here on earth, abuse of the concept of mercy or not.

In fact, Paul was saying nonbelievers can't be held accountable for breaking the commandments, because they don't believe in them to begin with. If you even bothered reading the first commentary that I posted (from Matthew Henry) you would realize that Paul is saying just let the rebel go, but the believer is not allowed to initiate the divorce.

It's about time your started doing a little more reading and a little less condescending and pretending to know everything. Time to forget about trying to work your way around the truth by abusing the concept of mercy. We are told by Paul not to test God's grace, and that is exactly what you are advocating.
 
Upvote 0