- Dec 20, 2003
- 14,397
- 3,067
- Country
- Germany
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Married
Putin has said he wants to denazify Ukraine.
What Putin’s talking about when he talks about ‘denazification’ - Jewish Telegraphic Agency
What should Russia do with Ukraine? [Translation of a propaganda article by a Russian journalist]
In Bucha dead prisoners with their hands tied behind their backs were found with evidence of torture. People who have clearly been executed with bullets in the head were also found. Zelensky is adamant that this pattern of atrocities, which he suggests will be repeated elsewhere, should be called a genocide but is that how the word is currently used?
The current definition of genocide is:
Article II of the Convention describes genocide as a crime committed with the intent to destroy a national, ethnic, racial or religious group, in whole or in part.
Was the subjugation of Ukraine, as originally envisaged, a program of killing anyone who disagreed with the linguistic, cultural, and spiritual union of Ukraine with Russia?
Is the evidence sufficient to justify this accusation?
The use of the word Nazi obviously invokes deep Russian memories of the German invasion and the heroic Great Patriotic War.
So the language of 'special operation' and 'denazification' makes sense as something which was designed to dissolve the separation of Ukraine from Russia. It is an utter rejection of the direction of Ukraine under Western influence and suggests that the Russians did not believe they could reverse this liberalization of Ukraine except by war.
Does deNazification mean the murder of Ukrainian nationalists and those who want to see Ukraine linguistically, culturally, and spiritually separated from Russia?
Is the idea of an independent Ukraine really so evil that it is worth killing those who promote it? Does the "decadence" of the West and its "victimization" of Russia justify this?
What Putin’s talking about when he talks about ‘denazification’ - Jewish Telegraphic Agency
What should Russia do with Ukraine? [Translation of a propaganda article by a Russian journalist]
In Bucha dead prisoners with their hands tied behind their backs were found with evidence of torture. People who have clearly been executed with bullets in the head were also found. Zelensky is adamant that this pattern of atrocities, which he suggests will be repeated elsewhere, should be called a genocide but is that how the word is currently used?
The current definition of genocide is:
Article II of the Convention describes genocide as a crime committed with the intent to destroy a national, ethnic, racial or religious group, in whole or in part.
Was the subjugation of Ukraine, as originally envisaged, a program of killing anyone who disagreed with the linguistic, cultural, and spiritual union of Ukraine with Russia?
Is the evidence sufficient to justify this accusation?
The use of the word Nazi obviously invokes deep Russian memories of the German invasion and the heroic Great Patriotic War.
So the language of 'special operation' and 'denazification' makes sense as something which was designed to dissolve the separation of Ukraine from Russia. It is an utter rejection of the direction of Ukraine under Western influence and suggests that the Russians did not believe they could reverse this liberalization of Ukraine except by war.
Does deNazification mean the murder of Ukrainian nationalists and those who want to see Ukraine linguistically, culturally, and spiritually separated from Russia?
Is the idea of an independent Ukraine really so evil that it is worth killing those who promote it? Does the "decadence" of the West and its "victimization" of Russia justify this?