So are we to start calling prophecy, 'channeling Jesus'?
I think separate terms to distinguish between something led of the Holy Spirit is appropriate.
Granted IMO many that are operating in spiritual gifts are not doing so via the Holy Spirit yet are passed off as being so. IMO this is why it is stated in scripture for known prophets to test the word coming from another prophet. It takes their discernment to confirm the validity for those without that discernment.
Well, I thought the psychic terms were neutral ground. A clairaudient person is one who hears in the spirit, period. It doesn't mean that they can't hear God, or that they only hear demons, or that they only speak to the dead. There is no distinction in the terminology that indicates what type of spirit they hear, just that they hear them. And ya know, God is a spirit too.
Somehow there seems to be an underlying Christian definition that associates the term with evil. I still can't understand what that is or how to identify it, but post after post in this thread have given me the impression that this extra definition is pretty well ingrained into many believers.
My bad. Language is not my thing. I came here to talk about the issues, not make a case for what words we should use to call them.
Upvote
0