Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
The big difference is between dumb as a rock "nothing" that started it all, and "something" or "God" that started it all. God, a creator over nothing, not only makes more sense, but logically, seems to be the only possible scenario.
Occam's Razor.
Good example, thanks.
If Walker, a famous painter, painted 3112 paintings - landscapes, houses, portraits, fruit, fish, skies, clouds, etc etc etc ...
they would all be similar to each other
(and usually, apparently, easy from the evidence(the paintings) to show the same source)
in spite of the widely different subjects,
and
guess what -
they all were created by the same person.
When YHWH created all the species, plants, trees, fish and animals,
they NATURALLY have MANY SIMILARITIES, because they ARE RELATED. - they all came from the SAME AUTHOR/ CREATOR.
He could have created them without similarities, if HE wanted to - HE does whatever HE wants to do.
And if atheists could prove just one prophecy of the Bible failed, they would have a case.
That's not how Occam's Razor works.
Especially since by invoking an arbitrary supernatural entity, you're now stuck with having to explain the existence of said entity.
... That's like saying the President of the United States is an arbitray natural spokeman for politics.... no...Especially since by invoking an arbitrary supernatural entity
Of course that's how it works.
Supernatural? and all that is here coming from "nothing" is not supernatural?
YHWH is not at all arbitrary... He is extremely well defined, known, and specific.
You are observing a huge group that you are a part of intimently all your life.Given the sheer amount of disagreement over the nature of god in the world, even to the point people still kill each other over it, I would say no, it's not well defined, known or specific at all.
Ultimately, the nature of god seems entirely in the eye of the beholder.
You are observing a huge group that you are a part of intimently all your life.
And you are using their own criteria to support their own declarations.
If you find one or two people called out of the world by YHWH, set apart and born again by Him, ask them (anywhere on earth, any country, any age group).
No serious disagreement will be found. - instead, perfect agreement, perfect joy, perfect peace, perfect righteousness, living in union all the time in Yeshua HaMashiah , Jesus the Messiah.
THen, maybe for the first time in your life, you may ask someone directly who is living in union willingly and obediently with YHWH (GOD).
You don't have to buy anything. It's obvious and free.Yeah, I don't buy that.
No. Occam's Razor is a case of where all else is equal, the hypothesis with the fewest elements is the one to select.
An explanation involving an unbounded supernatural entity is hardly the hypothesis with the fewest elements.
I suppose that would depend on one's definition of 'supernatural'. However, invoking an unexplained supernatural entity as an explanation of the origin of the universe still doesn't really solve the problem of the origin of the universe. It just adds another unexplained element to the equation.
The whole thing is hilarious/ridiculous, and it's amazing how multitudes of seemingly, otherwise intelligent people, just accept it.
If creationists could prove that a specific fossil organism didn't have parents, grandparents, etc. and therefore couldn't be descended from remote ancestors that belonged to a different kind, they would have a case.
Evolution takes the crossword of life consisting of millions of interconnected words for each and every independently existing species and claims to know how, what, where and why the words are, by cornflating a few inconsistent and incoherent words of the crossword of life and by falsely claiming that they know what, why, where and how the words are and came about across all the independent species.
This is the swiss cheese lie from hell that just begs belief, a lie so big and so mean and so terrible against humanity and the school children at risk, that only a lawless criminal mind can come up with such a fraud of the centuries.
How can we continue to bare these people and not have to address their lies directly in a polite way. We have to start calling them out for the sake of the school children at risk. For Christ's sake, these people are making teaching policies and advocating homosexuality, transgender, transhumanism, and post humanism and all anti Christ and anti humanity policies to destroy our families and children.
Stand up NOW for Jesus Christ the Creator!
The above confused argument against evolution was written by a human being with a coccyx . . . which is obviously a left over remnant from a previous species that actually had a tail.
You are observing a huge group that you are a part of intimently all your life.
And you are using their own criteria to support their own declarations.
If you find one or two people called out of the world by YHWH, set apart and born again by Him, ask them (anywhere on earth, any country, any age group).
1.
Are you a Liberal?
Do you believe that Jesus Christ is the Creator?
Do you believe that homosexuality is a sin?
Do you believe that transgender, transhumanism, and post humanism is a lie?
If you want to use the term coccyx, then perhaps you should be kind enough to answer the above questions to tell us who you stand for in truth and in honesty. Thanks and much appreciated.
Exactly. That is kind of the point.....You can find people who agree together that differ from other people who agree with each other. So this argument is worthless.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?