Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Since when has evolution stopped?the best ANSWER: ask your friend to evolve into a feathered creature........
why has evolution stopped?
give credit to the mastermind behind these marvelous creation.....
then why has it taken soo long for human to turn into rock?Since when has evolution stopped?
Sorry the link didn't work. I don't don't understand what the inherent dishonesty is.Here is on e example:
How do you decide if something is factual?"[/URL]
and it is so terrible due to the inherent dishonesty.
Since when has evolution stopped?
Ah yes we do have DNA. Evidence of common design. Bacteria are not human. Neither are chimpanzies. We are different from beetles and spiders. I always have to specify completely different cause if I don't evolutionists always say things like "what about this kind of beetle, it changed into the color of beetle". I mean show me a beetle that changes into something that is not a beetle. That's completely different.I did this math based on dogs, since I don't know the mutation rate of Triops specifically and need a rate of change well documented to compare to. Based on dog breeds, a new breed of dog can be produced by only members of a single existing breed within about 27 generations. My experiment spans about 173 generations. Based on the two crustaceans for which I can find mutation rate, Triops realistically could have a mutation rate at about 40% that of dogs. This would make the 173 generations equivalent to about 70 dog generations. So, should get a new "breed" of Triops, unless their mutation rate is exceptionally slow.
-_- knowing biology, evolution hasn't produced something "completely" different ever. Bacteria aren't "completely" different from humans, for example. Some traits always seem to be retained, like the fact that every living thing on this planet has DNA as their genetic material.
However, different numbers of segments in the legs and other such physiological changes are possible within my experiment. It's just that on the genetic scale, the experimental population would still be recognizable as a Triops. It's highly unlikely for a genus transition to occur within just 10 years, even if it is entirely possible for them to lose the trait for which that genus is named (the three eyes).
It never began if we are talking common ancestor evolving into all there is. Human has always been human, spider has always been spider, bird has always been bird and fish has always been fish.
Unless you're planning to make the argument that there is no point to the quest for knowledge or scientific advancement, then this comment has no point. I mean, we also existed for a very long time pooping in the woods and banging rocks to together to make fire. So what?
There is currently no cohesive framework or scientific model for intelligence design, consequently there are no derived scientific applications thereof.
You can keep going on about "commonalities" or "common design", but you have no scientific framework to back that up. It's just babble.
Again, unless you're arguing that we shouldn't keep applying newly gained knowledge to try to continually improve the way we do things, then I'm not sure of your point.
No it's not, because it doesn't explain anything. (Do you know what explaining thing entails?)
What "God did it" is is just a plug. It's a stop-gap for areas where we lack more coherent explanations. It was what people invoked in days past when they didn't know how weather or natural disasters worked. Likewise, it's currently being plugged into a gap of human knowledge around the origin of life.
At the end of the day, "God did it" doesn't actually provide with any relevant knowledge about how things were created. And certainly nothing we can apply in a scientific or functional sense.
You said something along the lines of how important believing in evolution is for our survival. My point is that is nonsense and I pointed that out.
Believing in evolution from a common ancestor is not necessary to find medicines and know how to best raise crops.
Knowing there is common design is extremely helpful when it comes to medical research.
So, what do they demonstrate?That the parade of so called progressive human skulls do not demonstrate what is claimed. Not even close.
I love how the further creationists get away from humans, the broader the allowance for evolutionary change becomes.
You do know that birds, spiders, and fish represent entire classes and/or orders of organisms represented by thousands of individual species, right?
Heck, there are almost 50,000 individual known species of spiders alone.
"Spider has always been spider" indeed...
Yep and they are still spiders! Imagine that! And they always have been since the beginning. Jusy like humans.
That is what is observed. Take a Poodle and introduce it back into the wild and in five generations you will not have a poodle, but you will have a dog. What you will not have is a poodle on a one way trip to becoming a cockroach. It is a variation within a means not a one way trip to the moon.You missed the point completely.
Saying things like "fish has always been fish" or "spider has always been spider" is like saying "mammals have always been mammals".
That is what is observed. Take a Poodle and introduce it back into the wild and in five generations you will not have a poodle but you will have a dog. What you will not have is a poodle on a one way trip to becoming a cockroach. it is a variation within a means not a one way trip to the moon.
It is preaching, i would agree.
Both Christ and Paul preached often and to many. You condemn BradB for preaching?
Support yours. Prove common ancestry.Brad can preach what he likes. The thing is, this is the science portion of the forum and he will be asked to support his claims.
And there are nonChristian forums, so?If that is uncomfortable, there are Christian only sections he can preach.
Brad can preach what he likes. The thing is, this is the science portion of the forum and he will be asked to support his claims.
If that is uncomfortable, there are Christian only sections he can preach.
The fossils to which I am referring are found abundantly across and at the surface of each layer that is said to be separated by great amounts of time. I can accept that perhaps rain drop prints and animal tracks could have been formed and preserved temporarily by drying mud. However to claim they would be preserved for hundreds of thousands of years while the next layer is being deposited... I find this notion impossible. The abundance of such preserved fossils at the surface between each layer implies that the layer was laid down, the animals and heavy rain left the tracks and then another layer was laid over it quite fast. Does it prove there was a world wide global flood? No of course not. It just shows that most of the observed strata layers must have been laid quickly in during wet conditions. (Like you would expect to observe if there had been a world wide global flood.)
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?