Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Creationists. Creationists are wrong here.here are several cases that should be note:
and this:
Israeli government scientist fired for his views on evolution and climate change
or this:
Biologist fired for beliefs, suit says - The Boston Globe
or this:
University sued after firing creationist fossil hunter
i dont think that it's a conspiracy, but im sure that something is wrong here.
I should think that God, should he exist, wouldn't respond to magical incantations.Wait........wait........wait.....
You will be surprised my friend.......
Their 3 month long lifespan makes them particularly temporary. Is that a problem with participating in the experiment?
The third one is a personal favorite, because of how convoluted the attempts at explaining it away are. They can be as ridiculous as suggesting he fell on his sword as an enemy soldier shot at him with arrows or hacked at him with their own sword, and this was all done through the will of god.
Scientists are all wrong, having been disproven by random uneducated people on internet message boards.That's odd. All the scientists and the scientific community at large says it is science. All the university science departments accept it as science. So is it a giant conspiracy or is the vast majority of the scientific community stupid?
I should think that God, should he exist, wouldn't respond to magical incantations.
Can you explain HOW we get to Heaven?
You're wrong about the testing part; like everything in science, it can be and is tested. You just don't care.
Plus, the process itself is observable. We see the same process operating today. There is nothing magical about evolution whether it's happening in our lifetimes or millions of years ago.
That's odd. All the scientists and the scientific community at large says it is science. All the university science departments accept it as science. So is it a giant conspiracy or is the vast majority of the scientific community stupid?
It doesn't work that way. Your god isn't real. Jesus isn't real. It's a delusion.True, though when you mention his name before others, you invite him into your life and love, love and love and peace and joy is what you will experience. I am happy for you my friend.
Dude! I was just showing that typing/saying words is not magic. If @sfs typed the words as you demanded of him, it wouldn't prove anything -- just as my typing those words didn't mean anything. Get over it.I don't know. But I know how to know and to experience the Lord Jesus Christ. @Tinker Grey certainly, I believe has got the right mindset to explore the unknown for him, how exciting, isn't it?
and you call this science? realy?
according to this logic a car evolved from an airplane since they both sharing similar wheels.
we also know that a tipical globin is about 150 aa long. so the chance to get the first globin may be low as one in 10^75.
thanks. so the claim that a mammal with feathers genes as evidence against evolution is false. are we clear about that too?
actually its not was my claim: "I'm here to demonstrate that common descent - as a hypothesis at face value - is a better explanation than intelligent design because common descent is observed in nature"
but as i said: we cant observe a fish that evolve into human.
Please point me to the test where we tested a common ancestor.
Please point me to observation where we observed something evolving from a common ancestor into something it wasn't already.
It's not either. It's a belief. A belief system that drives the theory.
It's not based upon real science which can be tested and observed. It can't be because we do not observe anything transforming by evolution into something it's not already. It can't be tested because you can't test to transform something into something else.
I've probably asked this before, but could you please point me to some of the scientific papers you've written? Because you'd sure better have some kind of expertise in science to be making that kind of judgment. Somebody would have to be pretty confused if he didn't know have any background in science but was still telling scientists how to do their job. Right?It's not either. It's a belief. A belief system that drives the theory. It's not based upon real science which can be tested and observed.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?