First I want you to prove to me that Messiah is real.
Than prove to me that Paul is real and not a false prophet.
Than prove to me that Paul is real and not a false prophet.
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Why do you have a Christan icon if you need proof?First I want you to prove to me that Messiah is real.
Than prove to me that Paul is real and not a false prophet.
What manner of proof are you looking for? Scripture? Or are we to prove that the scripture is believable?Thats not the point
Since you are Christian, then what is written should be proof enough.Prove to mean by whatever means possible that Messiah is real and that he is the Messiah and that Paul is real and that he is a prophet of the Lord and not false.
Since you are Christian, then what is written should be proof enough.
[FONT=Trebuchet MS, Arial, Geneva][FONT=Trebuchet MS, Arial, Geneva]Mt 1:1
The record of the genealogy of Jesus the Messiah, the son of David, the son of Abraham: [/FONT][/FONT]
[FONT=Trebuchet MS, Arial, Geneva][FONT=Trebuchet MS, Arial, Geneva]Joh 1:41
He *found first his own brother Simon and *said to him, "We have found the Messiah" (which translated means Christ).
[/FONT][/FONT][FONT=Trebuchet MS, Arial, Geneva][FONT=Trebuchet MS, Arial, Geneva]2Pe 3:15
and regard the patience of our Lord {as} salvation; just as also our beloved brother Paul, according to the wisdom given him, wrote to you, [/FONT][/FONT]
The NT says he's real, but that doesnt mean he ever existed or that the NT is a true document
What do you mean by "know"? Absolute mathematical certainty? Reasonable doubt?how do I know it wasnt written by some guy starting a new cult?
What do you mean by "true"? Historically accurate?
The only "proof" of historicity is the corroboration of other documents, and the internal consistency of the document in question. Are these the questions you wish to ask?
What do you mean by "know"? Absolute mathematical certainty? Reasonable doubt?
If you wish to engage in ancient conspiracy theories, you are playing with possibilities that are even less likely than the ones you question.
I asked you:"What manner of proof are you looking for? Scripture? Or are we to prove that the scripture is believable?"The NT says he's real, but that doesnt mean he ever existed or that the NT is a true document, how do I know it wasnt written by some guy starting a new cult?
1. the Resurrection it is attested by many early sources
2. Historic reliability of the NT books.
3. The rise of the Christian faith
These are rather solid "proofs"
As to Paul, he is written about and we have found several personal letters he has written.
In so far as ancient history can be evidenced at all, the resurrection can; try reading Resurrection of the Son of God by N.T. Wright.The resurrection is said to be witnessed by 500+ people, but there are not records of it besides the NT, what is the NT books are fake? how can you prove that they are real? The rise of the Christian faith is proof? Christians celebrate christmas, easter all of which arnt in the bible and were found to be added by Constantine, they believe in the trinity which also isnt in the bible and wasnt added till around 250 AD. 7th day sabbath was changed to 1st day sabbath by constantine who was a mithras priest.
So, the christian faith isnt very good proof.
A guy named Paul wrote some letter to other people to people like the Galatians, the Philippians, but that doesnt mean their real or that their actually written by Paul.
Do you mean the corroboration with the OT
according to the Christian church they contradict each other.
I don't understand what you mean by "all encompassing one truth." Please elaborate.Truth as in the all encompassing one truth, also historically accurate.
I don't think prophesies prove much. Certainly that's not their primary purpose.