Sorry for the late reply but I had some stuff to look up thanks to USincognito.

So first I'll answer the four questions then post what I've found on my own with the site provided.
Questions asked by Arikay.
1) Can you give us a basic definition of the theory of evolution?
From what I've learned in school and some research of my own, it's basically the theory that a small change in a species can change the way they act and/or look. However this small change I had viewed "As do some other creationist" as adaptation. With adaptation if the conditions are right for a long period of time, then the species will change to adapt to it's environment. Adaptation can happen in a hundered years where evolution takes millions of years.
2) If god created the earth, should we not also listen to what it says?
Depends on how you look at it. If you take the current translations of the bible then the answer would be
No. There have been mis-translations when men had tried to translate the bible from Hebrew and Greek text. Some mis-translations also go as far as to call God a perverse iniquity. The name Jehovah is derived from the Hebrew tetragramation of YHWH which later had vowels added and was based off of the hebrew words "Yah" and "hovah" which is "God" and "perverse". Now if I believed what was translated then I would call God a pervert everytime I pray to him. Don't take anyones word over anything when it comes to a subject this important. Do your own research and make your own conclusions based off of the evidence, which is what I'm doing here with evolution.
3) When the bible says that Rome taxed the entire world, do you believe the native americans were also taxed?
Yes. For they were still on the continent's that Rome had power over. Where is the evidence that Native Americans had come over here before?
4) How would you rate your understanding of the science you want to discuss?
Honestly probably a 2 or 3. "Upgraded today with the link USincognito provided"

But that doesn't mean that I can't disprove any of it. Science is a "faith based" skill as well. A theory is thought of and then evidence is brought up to try and prove the theory. Christians find it easier to believe in God by the same leap of faith as the Holy Spirit reveals many things once one has taken that leap of faith. Science does the same thing but in reverse.
-------[EOQ]-------
In repsonse that I won't use any links, please provide a reference where I have posted a link. I never stated that I would use a link in that way. This was in part because of other people who are using other sites such as Kent Hovind's Creation Science Evangelism, or other Christian sites to help their argument. I will not do this as I will study everything posted and come up with my own conclusions with why and how I came up with that conclusion. I can think for myself and I don't need or want to go by what others have stated. I have a brain and know how to use it. Is that wrong to put the work and effort into somthing I believe in? Or do you truely want to have another mindless link post debate on who has the better link?
In response to the Moons orbit, who controls the orbit of the moon? Satelites and space stations have guidence systems to keep them in orbit. Without that they would fall to earth or float through space. The moons and planets that orbit around our star while orbiting through our galaxy around a black hole would take a mathmatical genius to pull off such a feat. If something called "Orbit" keeps things from falling to earth then could you explain how "Orbit" works?
In response to the existence of God. I really can't give you any evidence since it's a theory thats been proven to true Christians by Holy Spirit. This knowledge has been closed to anyone who doesn't believe in Christ and this has been stated in the bible. Heres the quote from the bible but I highly doubt anyone in here will look. However out of respect since I am looking at your scientifical evidence, I ask that you at least read this quote to help keep up with this debate.
Luke 11:29
As the crowds increased, Jesus said, "This is a wicked generation. It asks for a miraculous sign, but none will be given it except the sign of Jonah.
Jet Black :: Thank you for the link but it didn't prove anything factual. There are similarities between humans and primates but that doesn't make us the same species. The human chromosome is signifcantly longer than any of the primates chromosome and it takes 2 primate chromosomes to make a similar match. The article is compeling and can convince anyone not willing to make the connection of this fact. When it comes to my parents descending from a primate line that split off at some point in time, I find this hard to believe. Mainly because of what I already know. Recently a horse had mated with a zebra and a striped horse had been born. But the horse and zebra are from the same species. This is the same as if a caucasian female had mated with an african american. They would produce another human of different color and size however it is the same specie so it is possible. Humans living in the himalayas who have changed in skills and apperence is part of adaptation, not evolution. It didn't take millions of years for their change to take place. If you have to lift something heavy over a period of time you become strong and soon it becomes easy. Your body would adapt to the situation and change to help you complete this task. If you had a child and taught them how to do the same chore then they would become stronger than you because they had to do this task from when they were born. This isn't evolving because if the child at any time decided to stop then the muscles would break down and become weaker, his child could then becomes as weak as you before having to lift something heavy. This is the difference between adaptation and evolution. Evolution is permanent.
Aggie :: Sorry to hear you had a hard time in high school, however I'm not trying to not look at facts and go off of my own beliefs. I'm looking for the truth and willing to admit if I'm right or wrong but the trick is proving me wrong.

As you can see here I'm all alone in this debate because I won't go off of what other Christians have stated, in fact I've probably offended a couple of them with my open views. But at least I'm willing to look instead of taking someones word for it.
Now onto what I came up with and yes I've been sitting in front my PC doing some reading since my last post. I needed to make some comparisons on my own when it comes to Darwins theories and human evolution. The theory as all of you already know is Humans have evolved from a line of primates from millions of years ago. Scientist/geologist have found what they believe is evidence of this occurance. In the picture found at talkorigins.org I noticed that the main focus is on the skull so I'll start there. I encourage anyone who believes in evolutionism that you make the some comparisons instead of just accepting what sounds right in someone elses article. If you haven't made the comparison yourself then how do you know that what you believe in is true?
Images are from a goverment funded site that is trying to provide a Digital Library for the public and is provided by the Division of Undergraduate Education of the National Science Foundation. Project name is eSkeletons.
Human Skull
wnt.utexas.edu/~eskeletons/human/cranium/cranv.jpg
Chimpanzee Skull
wnt.utexas.edu/~eskeletons/pan/cranium/craniumv.jpg
I can see a small similarity between the two but not enough to say one evolved from the other. First off all the argument is that man evolved and his brain got bigger. This is why we can use tools and build cities, communicate with each other and over come language barriers.
The problem I have with this is the over bite that the chimpanzee has. It isn't sunken in compared to the human skull. Chimpanzees and Humans eat the same foods such as fruits, vegitables, and meets. Why did this part have to change? I'm not talking about the teeth but the actual top jaw line itself. If the brain evolved into a bigger thinking organ but we ate the same food groups, then why did this change? You can see a better example in these pix.
Human Skull Side view
wnt.utexas.edu/~eskeletons/human/cranium/cranl.jpg
Chimpanzee Skull Side View
wnt.utexas.edu/~eskeletons/pan/cranium/craniuml.jpg
See how much further the top jaw line protrudes out? The Human canine tooth is visable but significantly smaller that the chimpanzees canine. Again if we had similar diets then why would this change? It can't be because we became more civilized and started to build cities for we still eat meat. So why have these gotten smaller? The argument that we cook our food isn't good enough since raw meat is very soft and cooking it can actually make it tougher to eat. If you use this argument then Human canines should be bigger and sharper to eat meat. The only other argument that I can think of {
At least to be fair} is the canines were used for killing and since Humans used tools at some point in time then the need to kill with canines diminished and the canines shrank over time. However this then brings me back to the point of cooking food and needing the bigger canines to eat tougher food.
I have more comparisons but I feel they are irrelavant for now since the skull issue has just been addressed. Anyhoo like I said, I'm more than willing to debate this issue but again, any sarcastic posts will not get a reply back. I'm here to have a serious discussion about Evolutionism vs Creationism. If I offend anyone then I appologize now, also if I miss a point then please point it out since I may over look it with more than 7 replies within an hour.
I'm going to bed but I look forward to any replies tomorrow.