Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
General Political Discussion
Prosecute New York Times
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="MachZer0" data-source="post: 25081828" data-attributes="member: 103753"><p>Providing classified information to the enemy during a time of war. Is that so hard to figure out?</p><p> </p><p>Yes, all positive repercussuions too. such as, insiders might stop leaking classified information to the press which in turn might stop priniting it in the interest of national security.</p><p></p><p>Give us a break. the freedom of speech and of the press are not limitless. Liberals have proven that to us over and over again</p><p> </p><p>Using the same logic that has been used to prove that the NY Times did nothing illegal (they were not charged with a crime which to some means they were acting legally), nobody in the administration has been charged with anything, so they obviously haven't broken the law (except for the bizarre charge against Libby)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="MachZer0, post: 25081828, member: 103753"] Providing classified information to the enemy during a time of war. Is that so hard to figure out? Yes, all positive repercussuions too. such as, insiders might stop leaking classified information to the press which in turn might stop priniting it in the interest of national security. Give us a break. the freedom of speech and of the press are not limitless. Liberals have proven that to us over and over again Using the same logic that has been used to prove that the NY Times did nothing illegal (they were not charged with a crime which to some means they were acting legally), nobody in the administration has been charged with anything, so they obviously haven't broken the law (except for the bizarre charge against Libby) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
General Political Discussion
Prosecute New York Times
Top
Bottom