Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
If you live in sin like unbelievers do, I doubt you will be saved, but if those who never heard the gospel can be saved somehow, is another topic.So, if a person does not actively disbelieve in the gospel, then can they be saved? For example, the hundreds of millions of folks in China who have never heard the name of Jesus Christ, nor ever will hear His name in their lifetime. If some, or any, of these folks can be saved, under what terms will they be saved?
You are seeing the reason for my OP. If non-repentance is sinful, and Jesus died for all sin, then it’s not unrighteous to save someone who doesn’t repent. It’s unrighteous to send anyone to hell who has their sins paid for.I said I don't know. I suppose it is.
There is a reason we need to repent to be saved. If Jesus died for all sin, and unrepentance is a sin, how come we need to repent to be saved? That is why I'm not sure. We need to explain that somehow. Maybe you got a good explanation?
One answer is the view of David Allen. Christ paid the legal dept and not the moral dept. That's why it would be unjust to save a person who hasn't repented.You are seeing the reason for my OP. If non-repentance is sinful, and Jesus died for all sin, then it’s not unrighteous to save someone who doesn’t repent. It’s unrighteous to send anyone to hell who has their sins paid for.
Okay, let’s say it’s unjust for God to justify someone whose sins are atoned for. Is it just for them to be punished for sins Christ took the punishment for?One answer is the view of David Allen. Christ paid the legal dept and not the moral dept. That's why it would be unjust to save a person who hasn't repented.
You say where is that described in Scripture. It doesn't have to since the Scripture doesn't deal with such details. It's however seen we need to repent to be saved, and that shows Christ didn't pay for our sin of unrepentance. If he did, repentance wouldn't be necessary.
Even if Christ did pay for unrepentance, it would still be unjust to save someone who hasn't repented, since the person is not willing to receive the payment for unrepentance. So the transaction can't be made. At least not without God making violence to the person's will, which would be an unrighteous thing to do.
The idea of repentance for salvation is a work that would bring salvation. Salvation itself is a gift, the repentance comes after.Even if Christ did pay for unrepentance, it would still be unjust to save someone who hasn't repented, since the person is not willing to receive the payment for unrepentance. So the transaction can't be made. At least not without God making violence to the person's will, which would be an unrighteous thing to do.
It would be unjust for God to not justify the one who's sins have been atoned for. It would be requiring a double payment.Okay, let’s say it’s unjust for God to justify someone whose sins are atoned for. Is it just for them to be punished for sins Christ took the punishment for?
I have known a wide range of unbelievers. To my personal surprise, many of them excel Christians in their lifestyles. They are far more moral, ethical, loving, kind, etc. than many professing Christians I have known. It is absolutely true that these people live in a state of complete unbelief, having never encountered anything related to the Christian faith. It is a great stretch to accuse them of "living in sin". Perhaps you could better define for me what "living in sin" actually entails.If you live in sin like unbelievers do, I doubt you will be saved, but if those who never heard the gospel can be saved somehow, is another topic.
Sure, I can look back at my own life as an unbeliever. I was living in a sexual relationship outside of marriage, I watched "porn" on the net, cheated with taxes, lied to my teacher to get better grades, barely gave anything to the poor, took any chance to get things for free I knew I really should have paid for. My life was soaked in sin.I have known a wide range of unbelievers. To my personal surprise, many of them excel Christians in their lifestyles. They are far more moral, ethical, loving, kind, etc. than many professing Christians I have known. It is absolutely true that these people live in a state of complete unbelief, having never encountered anything related to the Christian faith. It is a great stretch to accuse them of "living in sin". Perhaps you could better define for me what "living in sin" actually entails.
Thank you.
I will respond, just thinking about how to respond.
There are a few things to be said. First of all Christ didn't take the punishment for a specific amount of sin, he just took the punishment for sin. So it could even be said he took the punishment for the sins no one ever made, IOW you can't measure it in amount. So maybe that makes it easier to see how Christ didn't take the punishment for specific sins.Okay, let’s say it’s unjust for God to justify someone whose sins are atoned for. Is it just for them to be punished for sins Christ took the punishment for?
That was your experience and, sadly, is similar to the lives of the majority of humanity, but not everybody. Believe it or not, there are some (by human standards at least) decent, moral, ethical, happy individuals who definitely have their act together, but who are not Christians primarily because they have never even heard the name of Jesus Christ and who never will during their lifetime on this earth.Sure, I can look back at my own life as an unbeliever. I was living in a sexual relationship outside of marriage, I watched "inappropriate content" on the net, cheated with taxes, lied to my teacher to get better grades, barely gave anything to the poor, took any chance to get things for free I knew I really should have paid for. My life was soaked in sin.
Well, let’s see if that holds.There are a few things to be said. First of all Christ didn't take the punishment for a specific amount of sin, he just took the punishment for sin. So it could even be said he took the punishment for the sins no one ever made, IOW you can't measure it in amount. So maybe that makes it easier to see how Christ didn't take the punishment for specific sins.
I know many people won't agree, but I believe Christ bears our sins from the moment we come to faith. Until then the atoning sacrifice is a punishment for sin, but does not bear my specific sins. As I come to faith my sins are laid unto the atoning sacrifice of Christ, the punishment for sin, and I'm free from guilt.
From this view there is no double payment for sin. Either my sins are put on Christ punishment through my faith, or the sins stay on me and I will be punished for them accordingly.
So, you feel your view of God shows Him to be not "Just"?It’s not fair at all. All of us should be goats.
You change the timing, Psalms 51: 5 is talking about a sin with conception, but you are changing it to sin at birth. There is not mind at conception.I think the verse is stating that he as well as all of us were born under condemnation. The carnal mind is at odds with God and cannot be
subject to Gods law (love). Being separated from Him is what causes us to sin for we believe we are our own God, we make all the
choices, the determinations that bring about the outcomes. Not true but the mind believes it.
As a sinner you can change directions (repent) and not do one sin but do another sin. An unbelieving sinners initial change in direction will not be away from sinning or still having satan as his master.Paul was on his way to arrest those of the church when he had a divine visitation. That was the point being made. He was not a repentant
person until AFTER he learned the truth of his own salvation. "We love Him for He first loved us" Paul as an example simply shows it
isn't about repentance in advance of salvation for that would be a work that one would cling to, and seem righteous in their own eyes.
We know it is a gift, the repentance(change of mind, attitude etc..) come after salvation.
Those that do believe from the heart are those that have received the faith and love that come from Jesus Christs fullness. As a gift from
the Father. This is how God becomes the justifier of the one who believes in Jesus because He is the dispenser of both. Rom 3:26
It is an election according to grace. Nobody deserves it, but God has to start with someone then add to it as He predetermined to add.
Our head faith is not the faith in God that is imputed to us. It is Jesus Christs faith imputed to us that is accounted for our righteousness.
If we pretend that we can add to that and make it better, we deceive ourselves, as it doesn't get better than perfect already. We only
spot the garment(righteousness) with fleshly works that make us think we deserve it.
Actually, for the vast majority of unbelievers there is absolutely no choice to the matter. Given the fact that they will never even hear the name of Jesus Christ during their lifetime on earth they are bound to Satan as their master both in this life and in eternity.As a sinner you can change directions (repent) and not do one sin but do another sin. An unbelieving sinners initial change in direction will not be away from sinning or still having satan as his master.
The unbelieving sinner's choice is between, being macho, hanging in there, continuing to rely on self, and be willing to take the punishment you fully deserve OR wimping out, giving up on self and surrendering to your hated enemy (God) to hopefully receive totally undeserved pure charity. This is all done for selfish reasons (making it a sinful reason). After the sinner is showed by his enemy with unbelievable wonderful charitable gifts which is received as charity, huge changes occur.
Not at all. God would be just, though, if He didn’t save anyone.So, you feel your view of God shows Him to be not "Just"?
Does your God owe man anything?My God is totally just and fair, so are we talking about different Gods?
I’m saying that one is born a sheep or a goat.Are you not saying that at conception some babies are just destined for hell, not due to anything they did or said?
If you are born again you no longer live like this. If you do there must be the doubt you are born again.That was your experience and, sadly, is similar to the lives of the majority of humanity, but not everybody. Believe it or not, there are some (by human standards at least) decent, moral, ethical, happy individuals who definitely have their act together, but who are not Christians primarily because they have never even heard the name of Jesus Christ and who never will during their lifetime on this earth.
Do we agree this is something that happens after faith?Well, let’s see if that holds.
When you were dead in your transgressions and the uncircumcision of your flesh, He made you alive together with Him, having forgiven us all our transgressions, having canceled out the certificate of debt consisting of decrees against us, which was hostile to us; and He has taken it out of the way, having nailed it to the cross.
— Colossians 2:13-14
That looks pretty specific to me.
It doesn’t say that it happens after faith. Same here:Do we agree this is something that happens after faith?
When you were dead in your transgressions and the uncircumcision of your flesh, He made you alive together with Him, having forgiven us all our transgressions,
— Colossians 2:13
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?