Believe this, you do not want to go to an atheist site. It is like walking in to the devil's den. They are Vehement God haters and Christian haters. Nothing is spared there and you leave suffering from nausea.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Whether or not this is a Christian site has no bearing on the veracity of one's claim that one is being victimized.
If I go to an atheist forum and ridicule and degrade atheists there, atheists would consider it to be ridicule and degrading even if it is done on an atheist forum. Why? Because they accuse us of doing the aforementioned here on a Christian forum! How much more would they consider it to be ridicule if done in their own forum?
The locale of degradation has no bearing on the veracity of the degaradation or the ridicule. Ridicule and degradation is ridicule and degradation whether it is done in a forum (Christian or atheist) or in person.
A lot of people have been hurt by Christians. There is a lot of pent up anger. So that sort of thing is bound to bubble over when the cork has been popped open.Believe this, you do not want to go to an atheist site. It is like walking in to the devil's den. They are Vehement God haters and Christian haters. Nothing is spared there and you leave suffering from nausea.
A lot of people have been hurt by Christians. There is a lot of pent up anger. So that sort of thing is bound to bubble over when the cork has been popped open.
Funny siggy you haveThis^
eudaimonia,
Mark
A lot of people have been hurt by Christians. There is a lot of pent up anger. So that sort of thing is bound to bubble over when the cork has been popped open.
.
I'm sure that has happened to some of them but there is no excuse to act like a rabid animal. If a person is hurt by someone, they have a choice. They can come out of the experience smelling like smoke or they can use the experience to grow and mature. I was on the thinking atheist. There they had pictures of Jesus giving the finger and all sorts of vile things. Check it out.
To them, it's humor and a chance for laughter to vent hurt emotions. To you, it's "vile". It's a matter of perspective.
eudaimonia,
Mark
Believe this, you do not want to go to an atheist site. It is like walking in to the devil's den. They are Vehement God haters and Christian haters. Nothing is spared there and you leave suffering from nausea.
Humor? Oh stop!!!! "My feelings were hurt so I'm going to hate all Christians, degrade the Christians God, use fowl language, and act like an animal. Its more like an insolent teenager would act. Your not serious!
My post was addressed to Gadarene, so I would appreciate it if you allowed him to respond.
Secondly, the use of (y) is unsubstantiated and in fact is immaterial to the discussion.
You are not familiar with the account of Didymus who is called Thomas then.
Or the apostle Paul
Or the ten other apostles of Christ for that fact.
All of them believed in God, and I assure you, it was quite more than blind faith.
My post was addressed to Gadarene, so I would appreciate it if you allowed him to respond.
Secondly, the use of (y) is unsubstantiated and in fact is immaterial to the discussion.
We are concerned with (x) which is truth and (x) alone.
You coming up with all of these spurious analogical scenarios was an exercise in futility because you jumped into the middle of a discussion which was between two people speaking on one specific thing.
Your analogies by the way are rather inept at conveying any semblance of logical cohesiveness and meaning.
Humor? Oh stop!!!! "My feelings were hurt so I'm going to hate all Christians, degrade the Christians God, use fowl language, and act like an animal. Its more like an insolent teenager would act. Your not serious!
Your response is no to my question.
Therefore, you maintain that p2 could be interested in (x) and at the same time, refuse (x) if presented by p1.
It follows then, that the determining factor in the decision to refuse (x) lies in p2's impetus for rejecting (x) from p1.
What could possibly be p2's impetus or motive for being interested in (x), and at the same time refusing (x)?
A good case could be made that the refusal of (x) by p2 is because (x) is contradictory to p2's idea of what (x) should be.
My post was addressed to Gadarene, so I would appreciate it if you allowed him to respond.
Secondly, the use of (y) is unsubstantiated and in fact is immaterial to the discussion.
We are concerned with (x) which is truth and (x) alone.
You coming up with all of these spurious analogical scenarios was an exercise in futility because you jumped into the middle of a discussion which was between two people speaking on one specific thing.
Your analogies by the way are rather inept at conveying any semblance of logical cohesiveness and meaning.
The same way you know your loved one is on the other end of the phone when you are talking to them. You know the person and in knowing the person, you are able to determine whether what they are saying is in agreement with what you know of the person.
I do not see God, nor do I hear an audible voice. It is a communication that is not conducive to linguistic explanation.
Let me ask you, how are you so sure that your wife loves you, or how are you so sure that you love your children?
Such indignation, such avaricious appeal to good and bad form!
If someone offers me something, and I refuse it, would you say that I was interested in that which I refused?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?