• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Status
Not open for further replies.

redleghunter

Thank You Jesus!
Site Supporter
Mar 18, 2014
38,117
34,056
Texas
✟199,236.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Romans 2:11 is speaking of God being no respecter of persons when it comes to judgment. When we are adopted as children as we see later in Romans I think it is clear He lavishes love on the elect according to His will.
 
Upvote 0

GodsGrace101

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Apr 17, 2018
6,713
2,297
Tuscany
✟255,207.00
Country
Italy
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Too late here.
Will answer tomorrow.
Hitler had no love in Him.
God IS LOVE.
 
Upvote 0

Dr Bruce Atkinson

Supporter
Site Supporter
Feb 19, 2013
737
375
Atlanta, GA
✟88,038.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican

What??? "Predestination did not exist before 1500 AD?" So you do not believe in the New Testament scriptures? Peter said Paul's writings were scripture. The Christian Church (virtually every early church) believed Paul was an Apostle chosen by Jesus per the Damascus Road experience in Acts, and that his letters were holy scripture.

Please pick out whatever version of the New Testament you like, then examine Romans 8:28-30, Ephesians 1:4-5, 2 Timothy 1:9, and of course almost all of Romans 9. Then tell me again that predestination was an idea that occurred 1500 years after Jesus.
 
Reactions: sdowney717
Upvote 0

Marvin Knox

Senior Veteran
May 9, 2014
4,291
1,454
✟92,138.00
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Married
I understand exactly what I believe.
What you say Reformed theology teaches is different from what it teaches. That is easy to see simply by reading what the WCF says.

The WCF came complete with "proof texts". I can't do your homework for you.

Just be sure that you differentiate between what you think Reform theology "amounts to" and what it actually teaches. There is a big difference.

Anyone can see that from looking at your posts and comparing them to the WCF. That's why I provided it to you so you can compare it's conclusions concerning what the scriptures teach and what you have said they believe.
Are you aware that predestination did not exist before 1,500 AD except for one theologian back in the year 400 AD.Why do you think those that came immediately after the Apostles didn't pick up on this idea?
What on earth are you talking about?

Predestination was taught by Paul, Peter and Jesus.

The predestination of all things which happen in God's creation is also the necessary logical conclusion of a belief in the omniscience of God - even if it were not taught directly by the Lord and His apostles.

God knew before the foundation of the world exactly what would happen if He acted in certain ways. There was absolutely no chance at all that what God knew would happen would not indeed happen.

He has so acted and has continued to act in innumerable ways - thereby making it God who predestines all things by so choosing to act.

I can only state what the scriptures teach and what logic demands. I can't do your thinking for you.
And eternal security, or the preservation of the saints wasn't even thought of till 1,500 AD. Were the earlier theologians fast asleep?
Jesus was not asleep when He said, "Truly, truly, I say to you, He that hears my word, and believes on him that sent me, has everlasting life, and shall not come into condemnation; but is passed from death to life." John 5:24

Get yourself a good Bible and take a break from talking about things you know nothing about.
 
Last edited:
Reactions: sdowney717
Upvote 0

Dr Bruce Atkinson

Supporter
Site Supporter
Feb 19, 2013
737
375
Atlanta, GA
✟88,038.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
You asked: “Could you show me one verse that states Jesus died only for a select few?”

Answer: Easily. The most familiar NT quote is John 3:16-- Jesus died for whoever would believe in Him. It does not say how many or how few, but it would require belief. Billions have not believed.
In Matthew 7:13–14, Jesus did say, "Enter through the narrow gate. For wide is the gate and broad is the road that leads to destruction, and many enter through it. But small is the gate and narrow the road that leads to life, and only a few find it." The condition of salvation, the way, is faith in Jesus Christ. And ”faith comes by hearing and hearing by the word of Christ” and Jesus said that His sheep would hear Him.
 
Reactions: sdowney717
Upvote 0

ladodgers6

Know what you believe and why you believe it
Site Supporter
Oct 6, 2015
2,324
791
Los Angeles
✟251,002.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
Maybe because THEY are so dumb and only calvinists are smart. After all, they're able to accept a god that no one else can accept due to their superior intelligence.

Why the sarcasm? Is that necessary? Are you going to answer the tough questions I posed to you?
 
Upvote 0

Marvin Knox

Senior Veteran
May 9, 2014
4,291
1,454
✟92,138.00
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Married
I'm a chatterbox.
That's the problem.

You need to chatter less and listen more.

I for one would be very happy to answer any questions you may have. But you seem to be more interested in your nasty comebacks than weighing what I say.
 
Last edited:
Reactions: GodsGrace101
Upvote 0

Butch5

Newbie
Site Supporter
Apr 7, 2012
8,976
780
63
Homer Georgia
Visit site
✟336,535.00
Faith
Unorthodox
Marital Status
Married

That's not the Biblical doctrine of Election, it's the Reformers
 
Upvote 0

Butch5

Newbie
Site Supporter
Apr 7, 2012
8,976
780
63
Homer Georgia
Visit site
✟336,535.00
Faith
Unorthodox
Marital Status
Married
How does it not change God's nature if HE decides who is saved and who is not?

I thought God is an all good God...How does an all-good God send people to hell through no fault of their own?

It does. However, those who hold to that position have to make illogical claims to hold to that position. For instance, they'll say that God controls all things yet is not the author of sin. That is a logical contradiction. One can't control everything and something not be in one's control. The Biblical doctrine of Election is quite different than the Reformer's doctrine of Election.
 
Reactions: GodsGrace101
Upvote 0

Dr Bruce Atkinson

Supporter
Site Supporter
Feb 19, 2013
737
375
Atlanta, GA
✟88,038.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
That's not the Biblical doctrine of Election, it's the Reformers

The Reformers are the ones who went back to the scriptures themselves for their doctrines, rather than accept the corruptions that had occurred due to valuing human ecclesiastic traditions over the scriptures.
 
Reactions: sdowney717
Upvote 0

needhugs

Flibbertyjibbet
Mar 13, 2012
357
85
Visit site
✟36,594.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I will watch the videos.
he's got plenty of vids, lots to learn... i'm excited to learn that you will be learning
just ignore the stuff on the trinity... i know some people get weird about the trinity... and i can't explain that lol... to me, the trinity is a simple matter, but not for others i guess.
 
Upvote 0

Butch5

Newbie
Site Supporter
Apr 7, 2012
8,976
780
63
Homer Georgia
Visit site
✟336,535.00
Faith
Unorthodox
Marital Status
Married

Actually, John 3:16 doesn't say Christ died for only some. It says,

16 For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. (Jn. 3:16 KJV)

He gave His Son "THAT" whosoever believes should not perish. This verse doesn't limit Christ's death to only those who believe. Let me give you an example. "I rented the movie theater that whosoever wants to see the film, can." Have rented the theater only for a certain few or for everyone? I've rented the theater. It belongs to me for that time. Anyone who wants to see the film, can. Just because one chooses not to doesn't mean I haven't rented the theater for them. Likewise God gave His Son, that whosoever believes should not perish. That some do doesn't mean Christ didn't die for them too.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Butch5

Newbie
Site Supporter
Apr 7, 2012
8,976
780
63
Homer Georgia
Visit site
✟336,535.00
Faith
Unorthodox
Marital Status
Married
The Reformers are the ones who went back to the scriptures themselves for their doctrines, rather than accept the corruptions that had occurred due to valuing human ecclesiastic traditions over the scriptures.

I agree they did rid themselves of some error, however, they didn't go back to Biblical teaching. They went back to Augustine.
 
Reactions: GodsGrace101
Upvote 0

Dr Bruce Atkinson

Supporter
Site Supporter
Feb 19, 2013
737
375
Atlanta, GA
✟88,038.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican

Well said, brother.
 
Upvote 0

needhugs

Flibbertyjibbet
Mar 13, 2012
357
85
Visit site
✟36,594.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
How does it not change God's nature if HE decides who is saved and who is not?

I thought God is an all good God...How does an all-good God send people to hell through no fault of their own?
oh hon, that's not the way it is at all... God IS all good, and He's not sliding people into hell...
there are plenty of places you can go to learn the truth
i'll give you one
bible-truths.com
ok, i'll give you two lol Martin Zender

And what do you think Jesus did with Judas? listen to his 'fate'...

Matthew 19:28 New International Version (NIV)

28 Jesus said to them, “Truly I tell you, at the renewal of all things, when the Son of Man sits on his glorious throne, you who have followed me will also sit on twelve thrones, judging the twelve tribes of Israel."

Yep, all 12, present and accounted for.

that last bit is from MY website, you can go there too

here's a video to make you laugh and cheer you up a bit
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Dr Bruce Atkinson

Supporter
Site Supporter
Feb 19, 2013
737
375
Atlanta, GA
✟88,038.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican

I agree that Christ died for all (redemption), potentially saving all. However, not all (nor even perhaps a majority) will accept that redemption and be saved. While the terms are often used interchangeabley, "redemption" and "salvation" are distinct terms with different meanings.

Redemption: Our Lord "gave himself as a ransom for all." There is a universality for what Christ accomplished on the Cross. This is what "redemption" means. And because Christ was resurrected, all will be resurrected. Death will die. But there are two resurrections indicated in the scriptures, one for the saved and one for the damned , see summary at What is the first resurrection? What is the second resurrection?).

Salvation, however, requires accepting that redemption. None who reject it can be saved. There is coming a time (the Day of Lord) when God, in essence, says “Time’s up!” He is not going to allow sin to forever exist, not in His Creation and certainly not in His Kingdom. But some people are children of the devil and not children of God; they are not lost sheep, they are goats. And you cannot turn a goat into a sheep, even if they bleat similarly.
  • “Children of the Devil” -- Goats and wolves in sheep’s clothing as opposed to God’s sheep (both lost and found) – these references are to people, not just nations.
  • Jesus: John 8:42-44, Matthew 13:37-42, John 6:70
  • John: 1 John 3:10
  • Paul: Acts 13:10
To summarize: All are redeemed by the sacrifice of Christ and by His resurrection and all will be resurrected. However, salvation into the Kingdom of God requires fully accepting this redemption (admitting they are sinners in need of it). None who reject this redemption (refusing to repent and trust in Christ) can be truly saved into the heavenly Kingdom of God.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Dr Bruce Atkinson

Supporter
Site Supporter
Feb 19, 2013
737
375
Atlanta, GA
✟88,038.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
I agree they did rid themselves of some error, however, they didn't go back to Biblical teaching. They went back to Augustine.

Due to their study of the scriptures, they just happened to agree with much of Augustine, who was the most biblically literate of the church fathers of his time.

It is rather like some people accusing me of being a Calvinist. I am not a Calvinist because we disagree on a number of issues (theodicy, eschatology, prophecy, Israel, doctrines of the Holy Spirit). But I do believe in the sovereignty of God, election by grace, justification by faith, and predestination-- per the New Testament passages on these things.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Butch5

Newbie
Site Supporter
Apr 7, 2012
8,976
780
63
Homer Georgia
Visit site
✟336,535.00
Faith
Unorthodox
Marital Status
Married

I don't do "Got Questions". I've found too much error there. However, I do agree with most of what you've said here. My initial response was, unless I'm mistaken, to a post where I believe you posted John 3:16 as evidence that Christ died for a certain number of people.
 
Reactions: Rubiks
Upvote 0

Butch5

Newbie
Site Supporter
Apr 7, 2012
8,976
780
63
Homer Georgia
Visit site
✟336,535.00
Faith
Unorthodox
Marital Status
Married
Due to their study of the scriptures, they just happened to agree with much of Augustine, who was the most biblical of the church fathers of his time.

Actually, I believe it's the other way around. However, Augustine was not, by any means, the most Biblical of the Church Fathers. I'd submit that he was pretty far off base when it comes to Biblical Christianity.
 
Reactions: GodsGrace101
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.