Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
She was never an ambulance driver to my knowledge.Something about them never having to lift a finger as long as they live while they are being fawned over in every interaction they have makes it impossible to view what they do as work. Now’s the part where Lizzy cosplaying as an ambulance driver come up right?
Ah, cosplayed as a truck driver and mechanic.She was never an ambulance driver to my knowledge.
I would guess they just hang out with people who don't fawn, on their own time anyway.They must long for people to be normal with them.
Well, I'd get fed up with it pretty soon, as well as not liking having my life organised by others. (A minor royal might not be too bad though. ) Obviously, there are much worse jobs, but that doesn't mean that they don't work and many of them have too high a sense of duty to abdicate.Yes, a life of luxury and deference must wear on one so.
Can’t be longing too hard with the lack of abdications to live normal private lives.
Yes. when they.can. I think it's when they are at Balmoral that they can be more informal.I would guess they just hang out with people who don't fawn, on their own time anyway.
Normal is not a word I generally use about human beings, there is no reliable definition.
As Princess Elizabeth, she drove them and served as a mechanic, in the later stages of WWII.She was never an ambulance driver to my knowledge.
Whut? I'm the instigator of an internet term? Alas, I don't think it has the legs of a Godwin's Law...I made it up from Bradskii 's post #9 - "entitled non entity loses some titles. Oh no!" I am sorry you ended up trying to Google it, it is just an abbreviation of "entitled non entity oh no", and in future will be used by me as a humorous, and harmless disrepectful way to refer to A.Windsor.
No, I do not use social media. It is not about to fall into common use or anything. You did nothing but entertain a couple of neurons in my brain, and they are still amused.Whut? I'm the instigator of an internet term? Alas, I don't think it has the legs of a Godwin's Law...
Shame. I was going to split the royalties with you.No, I do not use social media. It is not about to fall into common use or anything. You did nothing but entertain a couple of neurons in my brain, and they are still amused.
With prison overcrowding in the UK the government are desperately trying to avoid sending people to prison, or indeed releasing even potentially dangerous criminals early. It was reported in the news yesterday that a prisoner who was released early went on to commit murder. Had he been kept in to term, the murder would not have occurred.Personally I think that punishment would be prison.
A. Windsor has not actually been deemed guilty of anything by a court, prison overcrowding has nothing to do with it.With prison overcrowding in the UK the government are desperately trying to avoid sending people to prison, or indeed releasing even potentially dangerous criminals early.
Correct, an allegation exists, not a guilty verdict, a complaint.There's an allegation against Andrew Windsor concerning decades old sexual abuse,
A. Windsor has not actually been deemed guilty of anything by a court, prison overcrowding has nothing to do with it.
My post does say he is guilty of behaving in a manner that is not appropriate for an HRH, all the King has done is act on that.Yes. He's being penalized on the basis of allegations. And he's unlikely to get a day in court, allegations or not, because the court/prison system is close to collapse and the witness is deceased.
Andrew seems *exactly* the kind of person who would be a "royal".My post does say he is guilty of behaving in a manner that is not appropriate for an HRH, all the King has done is act on that.
It's just as well that a royal title cannot be lost for adultery, or Charles would be in the soup. Kind Regards.My post does say he is guilty of behaving in a manner that is not appropriate for an HRH, all the King has done is act on that.
I would be amusing to see him finish below Count Binface.He can vote now...good grief.
"While a highly unprecedented move, Andrew could choose to shift from Palace to politics as he is indeed able to vote.
Mr Hardman stressed that though it is unlikely he would vote, 'he could stand for the local council in Norfolk' and 'do something useful'.
Making light of a scenario in which a former Prince could stand for a role in public office, he added: 'I'm not sure he'd get many votes'."
Royal expert Robert Hardman answers questions about Andrew's future
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?