Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
President addresses March for Life
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Fantine" data-source="post: 72249493" data-attributes="member: 114159"><p>The President who (with help from a ghostwriter) wrote "The Art of the Deal" has obviously convinced Right-to-Lifers to make a Faustian deal with him.</p><p></p><p>It is one thing to want to criminalize abortion through political means in an attempt to end it. It is another to accept the help of a man who, first of all, has been tracked lying about 75% of the time, who reneges on promises regularly, who has never shown any interest in the right-to-life except as a way to get a few more votes from gullible people of conscience desperate enough to believe he will help them.</p><p></p><p>What did the marchers get in return for their trust? A rambling, disjointed monosyllabic rant that could be read better by a third grader.</p><p></p><p>And what did they lose? They lost their credibility. They lost their ability to convince fence sitters that they had integrity--because they headlined someone who behaves with no integrity.</p><p></p><p>I was invited to participate in a local Women's March yesterday, but begged off because I only agree with 99% of their aims. They only need 70,000 more votes nationwide to bring social justice back to our nation--and I believe that if they weren't so rabidly pro-choice they could get those 70,000 votes--and many more.</p><p></p><p>Especially with March for Lifers making a deal with Donald J. Trump's record on the many issues that encompass "life."</p><p></p><p>*Note: I took pains to address only the president's behavior without maligning his character.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Fantine, post: 72249493, member: 114159"] The President who (with help from a ghostwriter) wrote "The Art of the Deal" has obviously convinced Right-to-Lifers to make a Faustian deal with him. It is one thing to want to criminalize abortion through political means in an attempt to end it. It is another to accept the help of a man who, first of all, has been tracked lying about 75% of the time, who reneges on promises regularly, who has never shown any interest in the right-to-life except as a way to get a few more votes from gullible people of conscience desperate enough to believe he will help them. What did the marchers get in return for their trust? A rambling, disjointed monosyllabic rant that could be read better by a third grader. And what did they lose? They lost their credibility. They lost their ability to convince fence sitters that they had integrity--because they headlined someone who behaves with no integrity. I was invited to participate in a local Women's March yesterday, but begged off because I only agree with 99% of their aims. They only need 70,000 more votes nationwide to bring social justice back to our nation--and I believe that if they weren't so rabidly pro-choice they could get those 70,000 votes--and many more. Especially with March for Lifers making a deal with Donald J. Trump's record on the many issues that encompass "life." *Note: I took pains to address only the president's behavior without maligning his character. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
President addresses March for Life
Top
Bottom