Archaic Homo sapiens - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
this says that archaic homo sapiens go back 500,000 years.
of course, homo erectus goes back 1.5 million years.
theWaris1 said:They have affros like the Negros. The kinky hair is found only among blacks.
theWaris1 said:The point was Causcasins were found 15,000 years ago in North America older than Indians remains. I don't believe that scientific junk about 200,000 year ago. Bones are not found that old. Can we really believe carbon dating or other methods are accurate?
Then you changed the date -
At least try to keep your 'facts' straight.
Have you seen the articles on the oldest known skeletal remains in North America being from Caucasians? At least two separate finds predate any other remains.
And as Ishraqiyun pointed out, much as this Aryan business was romantized by late 19th / early 20th century racialists.
Not really. Don't be fooled by appearance, they're not directly related to Africans (how could they be?). Their nearest relatives are Asians, specifically Indians.
Who you disputing?Sorry but this is false. Americas is homeland to the Amerindians not Caucasians. The only people claiming whites were in Americas first are white american supremacists on websites like Stormfront.
Because Americans know they are not indigenous to America and invaded they invent nonsense about them being there before the Amerindians. Stems out of insecurity, and its just like the crazy Afrocentrics who think they were in Europe before whites. Their evidence? They claim stuff like the legendary ''black dwarves'' of Norse mythology were infact Africoid pygmies. LOL.
many (maybe most) cultures believe that the earth is periodically destroyed and recreated.
Differences? There are difference that come from every group that branches off of another.Buddy if you can't tell the diffrence between two completely different people from two completely different continents because you think they kinda look the same, well ...
Cheery-picking much? All that stuff about Africa is rubbish but when it's an apparently 'white' skeleton found in North America it MUST be true man, it MUST be!
Incidently the next time a creationists complains that evolution is racist I'm going to show them this thread, and all the other threads Research3 has commented it.
Differences? There are difference that come from every group that branches off of another.
Do the Swedes look just like Norwegians or Danes?
Do either look just like Germans? How about Switz?
They all have differences but yet came from similar origins.
You invented the racial crap here bud. I never said the white bones were a true man. That came from your mind. You should show them just how racist you are. You can take your racist attitude and ignorance somewhere else.
I did a quick search and didn't investigate every link. the skeleton finds were big news. My wife is part Amerindian. You just another American bashing kook with your own agenda. My agenda is simply to seek truth where ever it may be found. You are a liar that thinks you know much.You are as bad as notedstrangeperson. Both of your views are linked to your modern socio-political outlook. While notedstrangeperson is a far lefty whose views are all based on a politically correct agenda, you appear to be a right ring american eurocentric who has also a personal agenda and twists archaeological findings to claim europeans were in america before the Amerindian. Not good. You are basically dumping on all academic research and history of the Americas. Your views are also deeply offensive to the real native amerindian peoples of America.
How does hair being "kinky" prevent it from covering a person? I would say it covers just as well as straight hair.
Why don't Europeans speak a Semitic language if they are actually descended form the Israelites? Did they forget it and borrow someone elses language?
Research3 said:Irrelevent. You only have to go to North India today to see how different the Northern Indians are to the southern Dravidians. This is because of their Aryan genes.
theWaris1 said:(To Notedstrangeperson) You invented the racial crap here bud. I never said the white bones were a true man. That came from your mind. You should show them just how racist you are. You can take your racist attitude and ignorance somewhere else.
Research3 said:(To theWaris1) You are as bad as notedstrangeperson. Both of your views are linked to your modern socio-political outlook. While notedstrangeperson is a far lefty whose views are all based on a politically correct agenda, you appear to be a right ring american eurocentric who has also a personal agenda and twists archaeological findings to claim europeans were in america before the Amerindian. Not good. You are basically dumping on all academic research and history of the Americas. Your views are also deeply offensive to the real native amerindian peoples of America.
Research3 said:No i'm a true racial/ethno nationalist/CI proponent. I don't muck around with my ideology and don't have time for posers who fool around with it.
As i predicted you yourself are either a mutt, and its no surprise your wife is also mixed race. I'm not therefore sure why you are toying around with British Israelism or Christian Identity tenets (e.g. Northern Europeans are true Israel). The Bible commands the Israelites to remain a seperate people and never to intermarry. America is the polar opposite of this, look at your history - and furthermore you just admitted your wife is not white. I'm not sure then why you are subscribing to CI/BI beliefs, you are dumbing down our movement.
Research3 said:''But if a woman have long hair, it is a glory to her: for [her] hair is given her for a covering''
Only certian races can grown hair long for covering.
granpa said:chimpanzees are born white and become black as they age.
at some point hominids evolved that remained white throughout life.
this is called neoteny.
Since all modern blacks are born black and remain black it seems more probable that they (modern blacks) evolved from whites at least once in Africa and possibly a second time in India.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?