Research3 said:
Irrelevent. You only have to go to North India today to see how different the Northern Indians are to the southern Dravidians. This is because of their Aryan genes.
The photographs you've posted aren't of Northern and Southern Indians, they're high- and low-caste Indians. The caste system is based on class, not race, and originates from Hinduism.
Your understanding of the link from Wikipedia (not a reliable source BTW) on Proto-Australoids is mistaken too. The term 'Aboriginal' simply refers to indigenous people, not just the natives of Australia. Noticably the article not only tracks the route to Australia but also the route to north America - so unless you think Red Indians are also 'negroids' the link is irrelevent.
theWaris1 said:
(To Notedstrangeperson) You invented the racial crap here bud. I never said the white bones were a true man. That came from your mind. You should show them just how racist you are. You can take your racist attitude and ignorance somewhere else.
Followed by ...
Research3 said:
(To theWaris1) You are as bad as notedstrangeperson. Both of your views are linked to your modern socio-political outlook. While notedstrangeperson is a far lefty whose views are all based on a politically correct agenda, you appear to be a right ring american eurocentric who has also a personal agenda and twists archaeological findings to claim europeans were in america before the Amerindian. Not good. You are basically dumping on all academic research and history of the Americas. Your views are also deeply offensive to the real native amerindian peoples of America.
Sucks to be called a racist doesn't it?
Funny to see him try and defend Native Americans though. Is this the begining of a new, more tolerant
Research3?
Research3 said:
No i'm a true racial/ethno nationalist/CI proponent. I don't muck around with my ideology and don't have time for posers who fool around with it.
As i predicted you yourself are either a mutt, and its no surprise your wife is also mixed race. I'm not therefore sure why you are toying around with British Israelism or Christian Identity tenets (e.g. Northern Europeans are true Israel). The Bible commands the Israelites to remain a seperate people and never to intermarry. America is the polar opposite of this, look at your history - and furthermore you just admitted your wife is not white. I'm not sure then why you are subscribing to CI/BI beliefs, you are dumbing down our movement.
Guess not. Anyone who disagrees with with
Research3 is obviously one of those disgusting, mongrel heathens God hates so much. How dare you betray your race by marrying a non-Adamite.
Ouch. You're turning into a vicious little bully
Research3. And I'm pretty sure it's damn near impossible to further dumb down the Christian Identity movement.
Research3 said:
''But if a woman have long hair, it is a glory to her: for [her] hair is given her for a covering''
Only certian races can grown hair long for covering.
Ah, so next on the long list of requirements for Adamites is long hair. I think Muslims have a similar law regarding beards length. Interestingly the record for the world's longest hair belongs to
Xie Qiuping. Judging by her name I'm guesing she's not an 'Adamite'.
-----------------
Following a quick calculation regarding Deuteronomy 23:2, anybody who is (roughly) more than 1/1000th or 0.01% non-Jewish cannot be a Jewish. Or "Adamite". Damn. Can anybody here trace their family lineage back 10 generations? I'm pretty sure you'll find a good chunk of 'mongrel' genes in there.
On a side-note
Research3, why do you keep using the Old Testament to describe Christianity? Christianity didn't even exist when it was written.