Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
And there was never a word for homosexual sex so who decided that the words in the bible meant something that did not exist in language form at the time.All of those things did not exist at all back then, but homosexual sex did. There's the difference.
They also agree that homos can't produce children on their own. No homosexual couple can have sex and produce a baby, ever. Anatomically, all you have to do is look at the woman body and man body and tell how they fit together perfectly, as if THEY WERE MADE THAT WAY!! Not so for a 2 men's bodies or 2 women's bodies.Do not use science as both the scientific and psychiatric communities agree that it is normal and natural.
The actual word "homosexual" wasn't mentioned, but it says a man laid with a man as he does with a woman.And there was never a word for homosexual sex so who decided that the words in the bible meant something that did not exist in language form at the time.
Again you are not reading the answer you have been given. But in some cultures it is perfectly natural, and I have no problem with two consenting 13 year olds participating together.I asked was it natural.
So, is it okay for a 13 year old and a 30 year old?
That is what it's about. Every time I've seen OT scripture posted it was about sex. It wasn't about love, it wasn't about relationships. It's not about building lives together. The crux is sex and no person has any business inquiring about a person's sex life. Call me old fashioned.
And another(Exodus 34:6-8)
And he passed in front of Moses, proclaiming, "The LORD, the LORD, the compassionate and gracious God, slow to anger, abounding in love and faithfulness, maintaining love to thousands, and forgiving wickedness, rebellion and sin. Yet he does not leave the guilty unpunished; he punishes the children and their children for the sin of the fathers to the third and fourth generation."
Moses bowed to the ground at once and worshiped.
Still another(Exodus 20:2)
I am the LORD your God, who brought you out of Egypt, out of the land of slavery.
And one more(Deuteronomy 30:2-4)
and when you and your children return to the LORD your God and obey him with all your heart and with all your soul according to everything I command you today, then the LORD your God will restore your fortunes and have compassion on you and gather you again from all the nations where he scattered you. Even if you have been banished to the most distant land under the heavens, from there the LORD your God will gather you and bring you back.
Fact is that the ENTIRE Bible, both old and new testaments is ENTIRELY about God's love.(Zephaniah 3:17)
The LORD your God is with you,
he is mighty to save.
He will take great delight in you,
he will quiet you with his love,
he will rejoice over you with singing.
All of those things did not exist at all back then, but homosexual sex did. There's the difference.
Only in Leviticus. The letters of Paul could have used any of the four Greek words for men who had sex with other men. Instead, Paul used a different word; which, as far as we know, he made up. We don't have the definition of Paul's word, but it is something that his audience presumably did know. But it wasn't a known word that could truthfully been translated as (male) homosexual, that it for sure.And there was never a word for homosexual sex so who decided that the words in the bible meant something that did not exist in language form at the time.
They also agree that homos can't produce children on their own. No homosexual couple can have sex and produce a baby, ever. Anatomically, all you have to do is look at the woman body and man body and tell how they fit together perfectly, as if THEY WERE MADE THAT WAY!! Not so for a 2 men's bodies or 2 women's bodies.
Why not a 13 year old and a 30 year old? Is it simply because of legal reasons? If we lowered the consent age to 13, would you think it was then okay for the 13 and the 30 year old to have sex if they both consented?Again you are not reading the answer you have been given. But in some cultures it is perfectly natural, and I have no problem with two consenting 13 year olds participating together.
As has been stated 50-100 times? the point is that marriage isn't about procreation, for everybody, and neither is intimacy.They also agree that homos can't produce children on their own. No homosexual couple can have sex and produce a baby, ever. Anatomically, all you have to do is look at the woman body and man body and tell how they fit together perfectly, as if THEY WERE MADE THAT WAY!! Not so for a 2 men's bodies or 2 women's bodies.
The female organs that are best stimulated are external to the body and do not require male genitalia. And the other is just an opinion and one I do not agree with.They also agree that homos can't produce children on their own. No homosexual couple can have sex and produce a baby, ever. Anatomically, all you have to do is look at the woman body and man body and tell how they fit together perfectly, as if THEY WERE MADE THAT WAY!! Not so for a 2 men's bodies or 2 women's bodies.
That does not even remotely say sex now does it.The actual word "homosexual" wasn't mentioned, but it says a man laid with a man as he does with a woman.
Well obviously sex isn't about procreation for gays. It's about self-pleasure. It serves no other purpose, ever. With heteros, it does serve another purpose - that of procreation.As has been stated 50-100 times? the point is that marriage isn't about procreation, for everybody, and neither is intimacy.
I will not continue this argument, as it is obvious that you haven't read the passages I'm talking about. Once you read them and actually the verses surrounding them, as they set the context, I will consider continuing the argument. But right now, it's useless.That does not even remotely say sex now does it.
You're obviously not understanding the post you are responding to. I was talking about OT scripture that is used to argue against homosexual marriage.Then here's one about love. Just for you.
And another
Still another
And one more
Fact is that the ENTIRE Bible, both old and new testaments is ENTIRELY about God's love.
Yea, I know some of you need to witness, however annoying I find it to be. I have no idea if your heart is in the right place. I can only say that monothesism is not for me. I disagree with the bible on many counts. I disagree with religion in general. If you find peace in it, more power to you.I know in the heat of battle I don't always show that love as I am called to do and for that I'm sorry. But I sincerely believe if anyone rejects Christ, rejects the love of God they will go to hell for eternity. If I don't say something, with passion, with fury, and yes with love that makes me worse than any abomination mentioned in the scriptures. It's not a gay issue or a straight issue. It's an eternal issue.
Sex is merely what it means to the people involved, why add something when it is not there.As has been stated 50-100 times? the point is that marriage isn't about procreation, for everybody, and neither is intimacy.
Why not a 13 year old and a 30 year old? Is it simply because of legal reasons? If we lowered the consent age to 13, would you think it was then okay for the 13 and the 30 year old to have sex if they both consented?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?