Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I'm on your "side," but I'd like the chapter and verse for the next time someone uses the infamous "shellfish" argument.
Those restrictions (food) do not exist. If you had ever picked up a Bible you'd know this. God struck down the dietary laws. I can give you the chapter and verse so you can look it up yourself.
He however did NOT strike down the law about homosexuality (or many others). I've already shown you that passage. Now if you can show me one where He has go for it.
Without getting too graphic, gays use different techniques than heteros. Try telling a lesbian couple that they can benefit from learning about the missionary style. I'm pretty sure that they have something missing that's required for that position to work.Techniques and positions can apply to anyone.
The territory around her? lol There is no need to twist your words. Your all-around ignorance provides more than enough stunners that don't require my input for entertainment value.
Thank you!Acts 10:9-16, 28
In verse 28 Peter is talking about how they aren't to allow divisions between the Jewish Christians and the Gentile Christians. Some take it to mean that God has opened up everything as "legal" for a man to do and it will never make him impure.
Without getting too graphic, gays use different techniques than heteros. Try telling a lesbian couple that they can benefit from learning about the missionary style. I'm pretty sure that they have something missing that's required for that position to work.
No, I don't consider that kind of sex to be wrong. Frankly, sex between two uneducated ignoramouses gives me the willies. That's what I take issue with.So you agree that same sex "sex" is wrong?
Should we then put them to death, since that was the law?
You can't have it all ways.
This sounds more like a personal attack than a valid argument.The territory around her? lol There is no need to twist your words. Your all-around ignorance provides more than enough stunners that don't require my input for entertainment value.
It is based on sex, nothing more or less. I have no religious beliefs.Is that based on any religious belief? Or is it based on our current legal definition of who can give consent?
Nope, God took the right to punish for breaking His laws out of our hands when He was nailed to the cross.
Leave room for the wrath of God. It is His to avenge, He will repay.
I talk often and at length with Lesbians I know about tongue techniques and there are toys that strap on to solve the problem you bring up.Without getting too graphic, gays use different techniques than heteros. Try telling a lesbian couple that they can benefit from learning about the missionary style. I'm pretty sure that they have something missing that's required for that position to work.
I'm not talking about using toys and such, I'm talking about natural sex with no man-made objects helping. If you use man-made objects, aren't you really making love to the object instead of the person? After all, the object is giving you the pleasure, not the person. Could it be that the person lacks something that the other needs to feel the pleasure that they turn to an object for?Without getting too graphic, they can make it work with peripherals.
And what spelling errors would you be referring to?Yes spelling errors show ignorance. Hear that OphidiaPhile?
So it's not really them, they have to use fake body parts. Tongue techniques have no basis in the missionary style anyway, which was my point of how not everyone can benefit from learning other people's techniques. TMI!!I talk often and at length with Lesbians I know about tongue techniques and there are toys that strap on to solve the problem you bring up.
Spelling errors? Where did I mention spelling errors? Or where does my post contain a spelling error. I'm not using word.Yes spelling errors show ignorance. Hear that OphidiaPhile?
I mean the consent part, who can consent? Is your basis of consent based on the current legal definition of who can give consent?It is based on sex, nothing more or less. I have no religious beliefs.
No, I also believe that underage teens can consent to other underage teens.I mean the consent part, who can consent? Is your basis of consent based on the current legal definition of who can give consent?
I'm not talking about using toys and such, I'm talking about natural sex with no man-made objects helping. If you use man-made objects, aren't you really making love to the object instead of the person? After all, the object is giving you the pleasure, not the person. Could it be that the person lacks something that the other needs to feel the pleasure that they turn to an object for?
Obviously, it's not an arugment. I'm noting reality. If you're a YEC, you're ignorant.This sounds more like a personal attack than a valid argument.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?