Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
..aggregation of interstellar gas and dust.and the stars came from.....
If you wanted me to continue we would be forced to enter the realm of theoretical physics. Considering you can’t even grasp a considerably simpler concept, biological evolution, it would be nearly impossible for anyone to teach you as abstract of concepts as M-theory and quantum mechanics. Of course there is nothing north of the North Pole, and the same could be true of the Big Bang.thanks for completing the thread
Hoyle was profoundly wrong about the particulars of abiogenetic processes. No one suggests that recognizably living organisms arose spontaneously from simple organic molecules.science can only assume that all the required chemicals were present on the early earth and that life or its predecessor has a tendency to emerge when the right chemicals are sloshing about in a soup. Such a scenario may never be replicated,even with the full power of modern chemistry we cannot synthesize crude organisms from amino acids, sugars and the like. The possibility of any macromolecule assembling itself by chance is profoundly unlikely as Hoyle once wrote "that a living organism emerged by chance from a prebiotic soup is about as likely as a tornado sweeping thru a junkyard might assemble a Boeing 747 from the materials therein"
In conversations with people in general on the subject of origins the questions are not limited to organic evolution alone.
But wouldn't it have been pointless for Henry Ford to have invented the model T without the oil having been refined in the first place regardless of whether or not he knew how oil was refined?What is so hard behind the concept of abiogenesis and evolution not being the same? Henry Ford did not need to know how oil was refined to invent the Model T a hundred years ago.
Ford could have invented the Model-T after someone else had refined oil, or after leprechauns began leaving gasoline on people's doorsteps. And we don't have to rehash oil refining every time we want to discuss axle ratios.But wouldn't it have been pointless for Henry Ford to have invented the model T without the oil having been refined in the first place regardless of whether or not he knew how oil was refined?
Someone knew how oil was refined which made the model T worth inventing, without it it would have been a non starter as is evolution without abiogenesis. It comes down to what I have said before that; some claim that we are here so it must have happened; this is not so far removed from others saying Goddidit.
It comes down to what I have said before that; some claim that we are here so it must have happened; this is not so far removed from others saying Goddidit.
Where did the ''big bang'' come from?
It doesn't matter how the first cell arose? The amount of time and money spent on the study of the subject would suggest otherwise as far as the scientific community are concerned.Ford could have invented the Model-T after someone else had refined oil, or after leprechauns began leaving gasoline on people's doorsteps. And we don't have to rehash oil refining every time we want to discuss axle ratios.
Similarly, it doesn't matter how the first cell arose. There are at least three main ways in which the first cell might have appeared, and even possibilities that involve combinations of those general pathways. However it happened, a recognizable nucleic acid-containing cell appeared (amongst millions of other proto-organisms), began producing offspring, and the rest is history.
It doesn't matter how the first cell arose for the purposes of studying the evolutionary transition between reptiles and birds, or between unicellularity and multicellularity.It doesn't matter how the first cell arose? The amount of time and money spent on the study of the subject would suggest otherwise as far as the scientific community are concerned.
It doesn't matter how the first cell arose? The amount of time and money spent on the study of the subject would suggest otherwise as far as the scientific community are concerned.