Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
You could use God, or any magic, to explain everything and anything. That is why it explains nothing.If gravity did not exist as you say then you could use that God after some time made gravity as a thing for fine-tuning the universe .
"The earth without form and void " then fine tuned for life .
..........BAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAhAhahahahahahahahahahahaha! <cough>sidenote for fun research: the microscope (world's best optical one) is making a come-back (so to speak) and a few have been made (apparently).
It was forbidden for what, almost a century or longer ? (I don't remember),
because it was too good. The amazing detail in cells, etc, that could be seen exposed a lot of the deceptive medicine motives and goals at the time it was forbidden , and if it becomes available again to doctors and to scientists, it will undo most of the last 100 years profit progress (money mongering). Personally, I think and believe it much more likely that Jesus will return first to set things straight, because the world has an overall direction of not being able to do that (not being able to do what is good and right and true).
HAAAAAHAHAHAHAhahahahaha! Oh No! You're a Conspiracy Theorist??!The same reason that health and science professionals who don't care for money at all, just an honest days wage that is, are silenced.
Imagine you could look into the world of germs and disprove most of today's germ theory that multi-billion dollar corporations depend on.
They rely on that people cannot see the truth of what they claim, to make their billions of dollars. Once people get "inside" info, like the whistle-blowers in any industry, the lies are exposed - brought out into the light for all to see the motives and the means being used - like most recently raising the price for 'needed' epi-pens astronomically just because they were the only supplier (a new owner of the company - widely exposed in the news across the country) ....
Well, while you and I might have to settle for hearing the truth, as they are so rare, others are able to see it, through a rife or rife-design microscope.
They were banned (probably confiscated and destroyed or put under lock and key) for a long time because it would have exposed what the corporations were doing as false advertising and fake science (made up test results, "tweeked" ? at least, to produce the needed results to charge huge amounts of money (extortion? , maybe) from people who thought they had no other choice) ....
You could use God, or any magic, to explain everything and anything. That is why it explains nothing.
Could you please answer my initial questions now?
Chinchilla, I never claimed to be an expert in any of this but I will do my best to explain what I understand.I did just like you did , if you don't need gravity
I never ask you to explain stars.then I don't need it either to explain stars
You misunderstood what I wrote. I said they (meaning scientists) do not know if gravity existed at the beginning of the expansion
I have now answered two sets of your questions completely and to the best of my ability. I would really appreciate it if you could now answer the first set of questions I asked as a common courtesy.
If it did not then why it started to exist .
Scientist say gravity is product of mass . How can you have universe packed into one single dot without gravity what is squzing the atoms together into one dot .
Quote then or show me post I lost them .
The above quote is definitely a claim invented by Kent Hovind (You don't "need" 20 stars to make one.). Now that Kent Hovind can no longer use a Gish Gallop because anyone can stop the video and evaluate his claims one by one, he has been thoroughly debunked, statement by statement, by numerous people. Probably the best is done by Logicked. Have you watched any of Logicked (or anyone else's) debunk videos? If so, why did you not believe the debunking?
I don't know.
As I said earlier, scientists aren't sure gravity existed at that point.
Actually, this is completely backwards. If you pretend you know the answer when you don't you end the need to find out what is really happening.So if you don't know why not account it to a designer . Even wrong answer is worst than no answer at all .
If it did not then accoring to for example Stephan Hawking universe can not exist .
I'm not going to sit through somebody's 100 videos to find one you would need to give me title of the video .
Moreover I don't agree for Big Bang like Kent Hovind he is wrong not only on that but on other theologicall subjects .
I'm just simply assuming your world view ( Big Bang ) and showing you that it is inconsistent and contradicting itself .
For me Yah created heaven and earth in 6 days and on 7th he rested .
If it did not then why it started to exist . Scientist say gravity is product of mass . How can you have universe packed into one single dot without gravity what is squzing the atoms together into one dot .
As I said earlier, scientists aren't sure gravity existed at that point.
The universe was pure energy & plasma to start out - so there was no mass for gravity to act upon, even if gravity were present from the outset. I think the universe hadn't cooled down enough until around a second or so after the expansion started when hadrons could form (see: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chronology_of_the_universe#Very_early_universe ) at the hadron epoch.If it did not then accoring to for example Stephan Hawking universe can not exist .
The universe was pure energy & plasma to start ou
I don't know?How can you get beginning from eternal energy and plasma ?
Heat, radiation, etc. <== this is my layperson understanding, so I'll likely be wrong...What is energy ?
I don't know?
How can you have heat and radiation of particles if all matter was in one single dot and there was no space nor time to radiate heat or there was no other particles to transfer heat from one to another ?Heat, radiation, etc. <== this is my layperson understanding, so I'll likely be wrong...
Because of all the evidence that says there was, no faith required.So why do you assume that energy and plasma were there if you don't know . That's faith .
There was no matter, just energy packed inside whatever pinpoint the universe was back then. That's what we see when we measure the CMB, and that CMB is what we predicted with the same model that tells us what the initial universe looked like. We've even recreated these initial states of the universe at an atomic scale with the Large Hadron Collider and confirmed other aspects of the model that predicts these early universe conditions.How can you have heat and radiation of particles if all matter was in one single dot and there was no space nor time to radiate heat or there was no other particles to transfer heat from one to another ?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?