I want to make it clear that my engagement with these points is in no way conceding that the blacklivesmatter.com page is at all important for the Black Lives Matter movement, it's just one organization among several. But as we follow this rabbit trail we are getting further and further from something that seems relevant at all to "supporting Black Lives Matter" on a message board. It's such a trek to get to whatever sinister point about family structure (which has not been clearly elucidated here) is being esoterically supported. This is the sort of thing I meant when I said initially that the rule is vague and incorrect.
You wish it hadn’t been clearly elucidated. It has. You just ignore it, and say that we aren’t saying anything of substance. You might as well say that the Bolsheviks were just one organization among several, that there were plenty of “true Communists” who weren’t Bolsheviks. Historically, it didn’t matter. Were there people of good intentions among the Communists of the early twentieth century? Of course. But the peaceful majority, if it was peaceful, didn’t matter. They were swept out of power by the minority that called itself a majority and the bloody history of the Soviet Union after having torn apart the (however degraded) Christian Russian Empire was the result.
The support of sexual anarchy is clear, as you yourself support it indirectly, as well as deny that the Holy Family of history was indeed the father-mother-child arrangement that we call the family, which was called “nuclear” only recently because of a rising distinction between families with more branches (extended family), families without such branches, and broken families (with too few branches).
Indirect support is still support:
Opposition to LGBTQ rights is not Orthodox doctrine.
There is no right to do wrong. Rights exist in order to do right. Engaging in sexual congress outside of marriage (one man+one woman in faithful monogamy for life) is sin, condemned explicitly as such by our Faith. You cannot protect “rights” to engage in such conduct and call yourself a faithful Orthodox Christian. To do so means that you reject clear and established Church teaching. You MUST admit that sexual anarchy is evil, by whatever name it chooses to call itself, in this case by an acronym that masks its true meaning, implying that ontologically, their passions are a natural, right and proper form of their being, rather than fallen passions that they experience, just as we experience other fallen passions, which is what the Church teaches us and you are bound to accept, or leave the Church. The one option you don’t have is to stay in the Church and teach that these passions are “rights” and not sin when engaged in.